1
Birds fly.
Birds do not fly.
Do birds fly?
Birds are flying.
Birds are not flying.
Are birds flying?
Birds have flown.
Birds have not flown.
Have birds flown?
Birds flew.
Birds did not fly.
Did birds fly?
Birds were flying.
Birds were not flying.
Were birds flying?
Birds had flown.
Birds had not flown.
Had birds flown?
Birds will fly.
Birds will not fly.
Will birds fly?
Birds will be flying.
Birds will not be flying.
Will birds be flying?
Birds will have flown.
Birds will not have flown.
Will birds have flown?
В «Birds fly.» (Simple в Present) глагол fly (летать) непереходный — прямого дополнения нет, значит, повышать в подлежащее нечего. У этого утвердительного предложения пассивной формы не существует.«Birds fly.» (Simple Present'da) fly (uchmoq) o'timsiz fe'l — to'g'ri to'ldiruvchi yo'q, shuning uchun egaga ko'chiradigan narsa yo'q. Bu darak gapning passiv shakli mavjud emas.In "Birds fly." (Present Simple), the verb fly is intransitive — there is no direct object, so there is nothing to promote to subject. This affirmative sentence has no passive form.En «Birds fly.» (Present Simple), el verbo fly (volar) es intransitivo — no hay complemento directo, así que no hay nada que ascender a sujeto. Esta oración afirmativa no tiene forma pasiva.在「Birds fly.」(Present Simple)中,动词 fly(飞) 是不及物动词——没有直接宾语,因此没有可以提升为主语的成分。这个陈述句没有被动语态。«Birds fly.» (Present Simple) में, क्रिया fly (उड़ना) अकर्मक है — कोई प्रत्यक्ष कर्म नहीं है, इसलिए कर्ता में बढ़ाने के लिए कुछ नहीं है। इस सकारात्मक वाक्य का कोई कर्मवाच्य रूप नहीं है।Em «Birds fly.» (Present Simple), o verbo fly (voar) é intransitivo — não há objeto direto, portanto não há nada para promover a sujeito. Esta oração afirmativa não tem forma passiva.
В «Birds do not fly.» (Simple в Present) глагол fly (летать) непереходный — прямого дополнения нет, значит, повышать в подлежащее нечего. У этого отрицательного предложения пассивной формы не существует.«Birds do not fly.» (Simple Present'da) fly (uchmoq) o'timsiz fe'l — to'g'ri to'ldiruvchi yo'q, shuning uchun egaga ko'chiradigan narsa yo'q. Bu inkor gapning passiv shakli mavjud emas.In "Birds do not fly." (Present Simple), the verb fly is intransitive — there is no direct object, so there is nothing to promote to subject. This negative sentence has no passive form.En «Birds do not fly.» (Present Simple), el verbo fly (volar) es intransitivo — no hay complemento directo, así que no hay nada que ascender a sujeto. Esta oración negativa no tiene forma pasiva.在「Birds do not fly.」(Present Simple)中,动词 fly(飞) 是不及物动词——没有直接宾语,因此没有可以提升为主语的成分。这个否定句没有被动语态。«Birds do not fly.» (Present Simple) में, क्रिया fly (उड़ना) अकर्मक है — कोई प्रत्यक्ष कर्म नहीं है, इसलिए कर्ता में बढ़ाने के लिए कुछ नहीं है। इस नकारात्मक वाक्य का कोई कर्मवाच्य रूप नहीं है।Em «Birds do not fly.» (Present Simple), o verbo fly (voar) é intransitivo — não há objeto direto, portanto não há nada para promover a sujeito. Esta oração negativa não tem forma passiva.
В «Do birds fly?» (Simple в Present) глагол fly (летать) непереходный — прямого дополнения нет, значит, повышать в подлежащее нечего. У этого вопросительного предложения пассивной формы не существует.«Do birds fly?» (Simple Present'da) fly (uchmoq) o'timsiz fe'l — to'g'ri to'ldiruvchi yo'q, shuning uchun egaga ko'chiradigan narsa yo'q. Bu so'roq gapning passiv shakli mavjud emas.In "Do birds fly?" (Present Simple), the verb fly is intransitive — there is no direct object, so there is nothing to promote to subject. This interrogative sentence has no passive form.En «Do birds fly?» (Present Simple), el verbo fly (volar) es intransitivo — no hay complemento directo, así que no hay nada que ascender a sujeto. Esta oración interrogativa no tiene forma pasiva.在「Do birds fly?」(Present Simple)中,动词 fly(飞) 是不及物动词——没有直接宾语,因此没有可以提升为主语的成分。这个疑问句没有被动语态。«Do birds fly?» (Present Simple) में, क्रिया fly (उड़ना) अकर्मक है — कोई प्रत्यक्ष कर्म नहीं है, इसलिए कर्ता में बढ़ाने के लिए कुछ नहीं है। इस प्रश्नवाचक वाक्य का कोई कर्मवाच्य रूप नहीं है।Em «Do birds fly?» (Present Simple), o verbo fly (voar) é intransitivo — não há objeto direto, portanto não há nada para promover a sujeito. Esta oração interrogativa não tem forma passiva.
В «Birds are flying.» (Continuous в Present) глагол fly (летать) непереходный — прямого дополнения нет, значит, повышать в подлежащее нечего. У этого утвердительного предложения пассивной формы не существует.«Birds are flying.» (Continuous Present'da) fly (uchmoq) o'timsiz fe'l — to'g'ri to'ldiruvchi yo'q, shuning uchun egaga ko'chiradigan narsa yo'q. Bu darak gapning passiv shakli mavjud emas.In "Birds are flying." (Present Continuous), the verb fly is intransitive — there is no direct object, so there is nothing to promote to subject. This affirmative sentence has no passive form.En «Birds are flying.» (Present Continuous), el verbo fly (volar) es intransitivo — no hay complemento directo, así que no hay nada que ascender a sujeto. Esta oración afirmativa no tiene forma pasiva.在「Birds are flying.」(Present Continuous)中,动词 fly(飞) 是不及物动词——没有直接宾语,因此没有可以提升为主语的成分。这个陈述句没有被动语态。«Birds are flying.» (Present Continuous) में, क्रिया fly (उड़ना) अकर्मक है — कोई प्रत्यक्ष कर्म नहीं है, इसलिए कर्ता में बढ़ाने के लिए कुछ नहीं है। इस सकारात्मक वाक्य का कोई कर्मवाच्य रूप नहीं है।Em «Birds are flying.» (Present Continuous), o verbo fly (voar) é intransitivo — não há objeto direto, portanto não há nada para promover a sujeito. Esta oração afirmativa não tem forma passiva.
В «Birds are not flying.» (Continuous в Present) глагол fly (летать) непереходный — прямого дополнения нет, значит, повышать в подлежащее нечего. У этого отрицательного предложения пассивной формы не существует.«Birds are not flying.» (Continuous Present'da) fly (uchmoq) o'timsiz fe'l — to'g'ri to'ldiruvchi yo'q, shuning uchun egaga ko'chiradigan narsa yo'q. Bu inkor gapning passiv shakli mavjud emas.In "Birds are not flying." (Present Continuous), the verb fly is intransitive — there is no direct object, so there is nothing to promote to subject. This negative sentence has no passive form.En «Birds are not flying.» (Present Continuous), el verbo fly (volar) es intransitivo — no hay complemento directo, así que no hay nada que ascender a sujeto. Esta oración negativa no tiene forma pasiva.在「Birds are not flying.」(Present Continuous)中,动词 fly(飞) 是不及物动词——没有直接宾语,因此没有可以提升为主语的成分。这个否定句没有被动语态。«Birds are not flying.» (Present Continuous) में, क्रिया fly (उड़ना) अकर्मक है — कोई प्रत्यक्ष कर्म नहीं है, इसलिए कर्ता में बढ़ाने के लिए कुछ नहीं है। इस नकारात्मक वाक्य का कोई कर्मवाच्य रूप नहीं है।Em «Birds are not flying.» (Present Continuous), o verbo fly (voar) é intransitivo — não há objeto direto, portanto não há nada para promover a sujeito. Esta oração negativa não tem forma passiva.
В «Are birds flying?» (Continuous в Present) глагол fly (летать) непереходный — прямого дополнения нет, значит, повышать в подлежащее нечего. У этого вопросительного предложения пассивной формы не существует.«Are birds flying?» (Continuous Present'da) fly (uchmoq) o'timsiz fe'l — to'g'ri to'ldiruvchi yo'q, shuning uchun egaga ko'chiradigan narsa yo'q. Bu so'roq gapning passiv shakli mavjud emas.In "Are birds flying?" (Present Continuous), the verb fly is intransitive — there is no direct object, so there is nothing to promote to subject. This interrogative sentence has no passive form.En «Are birds flying?» (Present Continuous), el verbo fly (volar) es intransitivo — no hay complemento directo, así que no hay nada que ascender a sujeto. Esta oración interrogativa no tiene forma pasiva.在「Are birds flying?」(Present Continuous)中,动词 fly(飞) 是不及物动词——没有直接宾语,因此没有可以提升为主语的成分。这个疑问句没有被动语态。«Are birds flying?» (Present Continuous) में, क्रिया fly (उड़ना) अकर्मक है — कोई प्रत्यक्ष कर्म नहीं है, इसलिए कर्ता में बढ़ाने के लिए कुछ नहीं है। इस प्रश्नवाचक वाक्य का कोई कर्मवाच्य रूप नहीं है।Em «Are birds flying?» (Present Continuous), o verbo fly (voar) é intransitivo — não há objeto direto, portanto não há nada para promover a sujeito. Esta oração interrogativa não tem forma passiva.
В «Birds have flown.» (Perfect в Present) глагол fly (летать) непереходный — прямого дополнения нет, значит, повышать в подлежащее нечего. У этого утвердительного предложения пассивной формы не существует.«Birds have flown.» (Perfect Present'da) fly (uchmoq) o'timsiz fe'l — to'g'ri to'ldiruvchi yo'q, shuning uchun egaga ko'chiradigan narsa yo'q. Bu darak gapning passiv shakli mavjud emas.In "Birds have flown." (Present Perfect), the verb fly is intransitive — there is no direct object, so there is nothing to promote to subject. This affirmative sentence has no passive form.En «Birds have flown.» (Present Perfect), el verbo fly (volar) es intransitivo — no hay complemento directo, así que no hay nada que ascender a sujeto. Esta oración afirmativa no tiene forma pasiva.在「Birds have flown.」(Present Perfect)中,动词 fly(飞) 是不及物动词——没有直接宾语,因此没有可以提升为主语的成分。这个陈述句没有被动语态。«Birds have flown.» (Present Perfect) में, क्रिया fly (उड़ना) अकर्मक है — कोई प्रत्यक्ष कर्म नहीं है, इसलिए कर्ता में बढ़ाने के लिए कुछ नहीं है। इस सकारात्मक वाक्य का कोई कर्मवाच्य रूप नहीं है।Em «Birds have flown.» (Present Perfect), o verbo fly (voar) é intransitivo — não há objeto direto, portanto não há nada para promover a sujeito. Esta oração afirmativa não tem forma passiva.
В «Birds have not flown.» (Perfect в Present) глагол fly (летать) непереходный — прямого дополнения нет, значит, повышать в подлежащее нечего. У этого отрицательного предложения пассивной формы не существует.«Birds have not flown.» (Perfect Present'da) fly (uchmoq) o'timsiz fe'l — to'g'ri to'ldiruvchi yo'q, shuning uchun egaga ko'chiradigan narsa yo'q. Bu inkor gapning passiv shakli mavjud emas.In "Birds have not flown." (Present Perfect), the verb fly is intransitive — there is no direct object, so there is nothing to promote to subject. This negative sentence has no passive form.En «Birds have not flown.» (Present Perfect), el verbo fly (volar) es intransitivo — no hay complemento directo, así que no hay nada que ascender a sujeto. Esta oración negativa no tiene forma pasiva.在「Birds have not flown.」(Present Perfect)中,动词 fly(飞) 是不及物动词——没有直接宾语,因此没有可以提升为主语的成分。这个否定句没有被动语态。«Birds have not flown.» (Present Perfect) में, क्रिया fly (उड़ना) अकर्मक है — कोई प्रत्यक्ष कर्म नहीं है, इसलिए कर्ता में बढ़ाने के लिए कुछ नहीं है। इस नकारात्मक वाक्य का कोई कर्मवाच्य रूप नहीं है।Em «Birds have not flown.» (Present Perfect), o verbo fly (voar) é intransitivo — não há objeto direto, portanto não há nada para promover a sujeito. Esta oração negativa não tem forma passiva.
В «Have birds flown?» (Perfect в Present) глагол fly (летать) непереходный — прямого дополнения нет, значит, повышать в подлежащее нечего. У этого вопросительного предложения пассивной формы не существует.«Have birds flown?» (Perfect Present'da) fly (uchmoq) o'timsiz fe'l — to'g'ri to'ldiruvchi yo'q, shuning uchun egaga ko'chiradigan narsa yo'q. Bu so'roq gapning passiv shakli mavjud emas.In "Have birds flown?" (Present Perfect), the verb fly is intransitive — there is no direct object, so there is nothing to promote to subject. This interrogative sentence has no passive form.En «Have birds flown?» (Present Perfect), el verbo fly (volar) es intransitivo — no hay complemento directo, así que no hay nada que ascender a sujeto. Esta oración interrogativa no tiene forma pasiva.在「Have birds flown?」(Present Perfect)中,动词 fly(飞) 是不及物动词——没有直接宾语,因此没有可以提升为主语的成分。这个疑问句没有被动语态。«Have birds flown?» (Present Perfect) में, क्रिया fly (उड़ना) अकर्मक है — कोई प्रत्यक्ष कर्म नहीं है, इसलिए कर्ता में बढ़ाने के लिए कुछ नहीं है। इस प्रश्नवाचक वाक्य का कोई कर्मवाच्य रूप नहीं है।Em «Have birds flown?» (Present Perfect), o verbo fly (voar) é intransitivo — não há objeto direto, portanto não há nada para promover a sujeito. Esta oração interrogativa não tem forma passiva.
В «Birds flew.» (Simple в Past) глагол fly (летать) непереходный — прямого дополнения нет, значит, повышать в подлежащее нечего. У этого утвердительного предложения пассивной формы не существует.«Birds flew.» (Simple Past'da) fly (uchmoq) o'timsiz fe'l — to'g'ri to'ldiruvchi yo'q, shuning uchun egaga ko'chiradigan narsa yo'q. Bu darak gapning passiv shakli mavjud emas.In "Birds flew." (Past Simple), the verb fly is intransitive — there is no direct object, so there is nothing to promote to subject. This affirmative sentence has no passive form.En «Birds flew.» (Past Simple), el verbo fly (volar) es intransitivo — no hay complemento directo, así que no hay nada que ascender a sujeto. Esta oración afirmativa no tiene forma pasiva.在「Birds flew.」(Past Simple)中,动词 fly(飞) 是不及物动词——没有直接宾语,因此没有可以提升为主语的成分。这个陈述句没有被动语态。«Birds flew.» (Past Simple) में, क्रिया fly (उड़ना) अकर्मक है — कोई प्रत्यक्ष कर्म नहीं है, इसलिए कर्ता में बढ़ाने के लिए कुछ नहीं है। इस सकारात्मक वाक्य का कोई कर्मवाच्य रूप नहीं है।Em «Birds flew.» (Past Simple), o verbo fly (voar) é intransitivo — não há objeto direto, portanto não há nada para promover a sujeito. Esta oração afirmativa não tem forma passiva.
В «Birds did not fly.» (Simple в Past) глагол fly (летать) непереходный — прямого дополнения нет, значит, повышать в подлежащее нечего. У этого отрицательного предложения пассивной формы не существует.«Birds did not fly.» (Simple Past'da) fly (uchmoq) o'timsiz fe'l — to'g'ri to'ldiruvchi yo'q, shuning uchun egaga ko'chiradigan narsa yo'q. Bu inkor gapning passiv shakli mavjud emas.In "Birds did not fly." (Past Simple), the verb fly is intransitive — there is no direct object, so there is nothing to promote to subject. This negative sentence has no passive form.En «Birds did not fly.» (Past Simple), el verbo fly (volar) es intransitivo — no hay complemento directo, así que no hay nada que ascender a sujeto. Esta oración negativa no tiene forma pasiva.在「Birds did not fly.」(Past Simple)中,动词 fly(飞) 是不及物动词——没有直接宾语,因此没有可以提升为主语的成分。这个否定句没有被动语态。«Birds did not fly.» (Past Simple) में, क्रिया fly (उड़ना) अकर्मक है — कोई प्रत्यक्ष कर्म नहीं है, इसलिए कर्ता में बढ़ाने के लिए कुछ नहीं है। इस नकारात्मक वाक्य का कोई कर्मवाच्य रूप नहीं है।Em «Birds did not fly.» (Past Simple), o verbo fly (voar) é intransitivo — não há objeto direto, portanto não há nada para promover a sujeito. Esta oração negativa não tem forma passiva.
В «Did birds fly?» (Simple в Past) глагол fly (летать) непереходный — прямого дополнения нет, значит, повышать в подлежащее нечего. У этого вопросительного предложения пассивной формы не существует.«Did birds fly?» (Simple Past'da) fly (uchmoq) o'timsiz fe'l — to'g'ri to'ldiruvchi yo'q, shuning uchun egaga ko'chiradigan narsa yo'q. Bu so'roq gapning passiv shakli mavjud emas.In "Did birds fly?" (Past Simple), the verb fly is intransitive — there is no direct object, so there is nothing to promote to subject. This interrogative sentence has no passive form.En «Did birds fly?» (Past Simple), el verbo fly (volar) es intransitivo — no hay complemento directo, así que no hay nada que ascender a sujeto. Esta oración interrogativa no tiene forma pasiva.在「Did birds fly?」(Past Simple)中,动词 fly(飞) 是不及物动词——没有直接宾语,因此没有可以提升为主语的成分。这个疑问句没有被动语态。«Did birds fly?» (Past Simple) में, क्रिया fly (उड़ना) अकर्मक है — कोई प्रत्यक्ष कर्म नहीं है, इसलिए कर्ता में बढ़ाने के लिए कुछ नहीं है। इस प्रश्नवाचक वाक्य का कोई कर्मवाच्य रूप नहीं है।Em «Did birds fly?» (Past Simple), o verbo fly (voar) é intransitivo — não há objeto direto, portanto não há nada para promover a sujeito. Esta oração interrogativa não tem forma passiva.
В «Birds were flying.» (Continuous в Past) глагол fly (летать) непереходный — прямого дополнения нет, значит, повышать в подлежащее нечего. У этого утвердительного предложения пассивной формы не существует.«Birds were flying.» (Continuous Past'da) fly (uchmoq) o'timsiz fe'l — to'g'ri to'ldiruvchi yo'q, shuning uchun egaga ko'chiradigan narsa yo'q. Bu darak gapning passiv shakli mavjud emas.In "Birds were flying." (Past Continuous), the verb fly is intransitive — there is no direct object, so there is nothing to promote to subject. This affirmative sentence has no passive form.En «Birds were flying.» (Past Continuous), el verbo fly (volar) es intransitivo — no hay complemento directo, así que no hay nada que ascender a sujeto. Esta oración afirmativa no tiene forma pasiva.在「Birds were flying.」(Past Continuous)中,动词 fly(飞) 是不及物动词——没有直接宾语,因此没有可以提升为主语的成分。这个陈述句没有被动语态。«Birds were flying.» (Past Continuous) में, क्रिया fly (उड़ना) अकर्मक है — कोई प्रत्यक्ष कर्म नहीं है, इसलिए कर्ता में बढ़ाने के लिए कुछ नहीं है। इस सकारात्मक वाक्य का कोई कर्मवाच्य रूप नहीं है।Em «Birds were flying.» (Past Continuous), o verbo fly (voar) é intransitivo — não há objeto direto, portanto não há nada para promover a sujeito. Esta oração afirmativa não tem forma passiva.
В «Birds were not flying.» (Continuous в Past) глагол fly (летать) непереходный — прямого дополнения нет, значит, повышать в подлежащее нечего. У этого отрицательного предложения пассивной формы не существует.«Birds were not flying.» (Continuous Past'da) fly (uchmoq) o'timsiz fe'l — to'g'ri to'ldiruvchi yo'q, shuning uchun egaga ko'chiradigan narsa yo'q. Bu inkor gapning passiv shakli mavjud emas.In "Birds were not flying." (Past Continuous), the verb fly is intransitive — there is no direct object, so there is nothing to promote to subject. This negative sentence has no passive form.En «Birds were not flying.» (Past Continuous), el verbo fly (volar) es intransitivo — no hay complemento directo, así que no hay nada que ascender a sujeto. Esta oración negativa no tiene forma pasiva.在「Birds were not flying.」(Past Continuous)中,动词 fly(飞) 是不及物动词——没有直接宾语,因此没有可以提升为主语的成分。这个否定句没有被动语态。«Birds were not flying.» (Past Continuous) में, क्रिया fly (उड़ना) अकर्मक है — कोई प्रत्यक्ष कर्म नहीं है, इसलिए कर्ता में बढ़ाने के लिए कुछ नहीं है। इस नकारात्मक वाक्य का कोई कर्मवाच्य रूप नहीं है।Em «Birds were not flying.» (Past Continuous), o verbo fly (voar) é intransitivo — não há objeto direto, portanto não há nada para promover a sujeito. Esta oração negativa não tem forma passiva.
В «Were birds flying?» (Continuous в Past) глагол fly (летать) непереходный — прямого дополнения нет, значит, повышать в подлежащее нечего. У этого вопросительного предложения пассивной формы не существует.«Were birds flying?» (Continuous Past'da) fly (uchmoq) o'timsiz fe'l — to'g'ri to'ldiruvchi yo'q, shuning uchun egaga ko'chiradigan narsa yo'q. Bu so'roq gapning passiv shakli mavjud emas.In "Were birds flying?" (Past Continuous), the verb fly is intransitive — there is no direct object, so there is nothing to promote to subject. This interrogative sentence has no passive form.En «Were birds flying?» (Past Continuous), el verbo fly (volar) es intransitivo — no hay complemento directo, así que no hay nada que ascender a sujeto. Esta oración interrogativa no tiene forma pasiva.在「Were birds flying?」(Past Continuous)中,动词 fly(飞) 是不及物动词——没有直接宾语,因此没有可以提升为主语的成分。这个疑问句没有被动语态。«Were birds flying?» (Past Continuous) में, क्रिया fly (उड़ना) अकर्मक है — कोई प्रत्यक्ष कर्म नहीं है, इसलिए कर्ता में बढ़ाने के लिए कुछ नहीं है। इस प्रश्नवाचक वाक्य का कोई कर्मवाच्य रूप नहीं है।Em «Were birds flying?» (Past Continuous), o verbo fly (voar) é intransitivo — não há objeto direto, portanto não há nada para promover a sujeito. Esta oração interrogativa não tem forma passiva.
В «Birds had flown.» (Perfect в Past) глагол fly (летать) непереходный — прямого дополнения нет, значит, повышать в подлежащее нечего. У этого утвердительного предложения пассивной формы не существует.«Birds had flown.» (Perfect Past'da) fly (uchmoq) o'timsiz fe'l — to'g'ri to'ldiruvchi yo'q, shuning uchun egaga ko'chiradigan narsa yo'q. Bu darak gapning passiv shakli mavjud emas.In "Birds had flown." (Past Perfect), the verb fly is intransitive — there is no direct object, so there is nothing to promote to subject. This affirmative sentence has no passive form.En «Birds had flown.» (Past Perfect), el verbo fly (volar) es intransitivo — no hay complemento directo, así que no hay nada que ascender a sujeto. Esta oración afirmativa no tiene forma pasiva.在「Birds had flown.」(Past Perfect)中,动词 fly(飞) 是不及物动词——没有直接宾语,因此没有可以提升为主语的成分。这个陈述句没有被动语态。«Birds had flown.» (Past Perfect) में, क्रिया fly (उड़ना) अकर्मक है — कोई प्रत्यक्ष कर्म नहीं है, इसलिए कर्ता में बढ़ाने के लिए कुछ नहीं है। इस सकारात्मक वाक्य का कोई कर्मवाच्य रूप नहीं है।Em «Birds had flown.» (Past Perfect), o verbo fly (voar) é intransitivo — não há objeto direto, portanto não há nada para promover a sujeito. Esta oração afirmativa não tem forma passiva.
В «Birds had not flown.» (Perfect в Past) глагол fly (летать) непереходный — прямого дополнения нет, значит, повышать в подлежащее нечего. У этого отрицательного предложения пассивной формы не существует.«Birds had not flown.» (Perfect Past'da) fly (uchmoq) o'timsiz fe'l — to'g'ri to'ldiruvchi yo'q, shuning uchun egaga ko'chiradigan narsa yo'q. Bu inkor gapning passiv shakli mavjud emas.In "Birds had not flown." (Past Perfect), the verb fly is intransitive — there is no direct object, so there is nothing to promote to subject. This negative sentence has no passive form.En «Birds had not flown.» (Past Perfect), el verbo fly (volar) es intransitivo — no hay complemento directo, así que no hay nada que ascender a sujeto. Esta oración negativa no tiene forma pasiva.在「Birds had not flown.」(Past Perfect)中,动词 fly(飞) 是不及物动词——没有直接宾语,因此没有可以提升为主语的成分。这个否定句没有被动语态。«Birds had not flown.» (Past Perfect) में, क्रिया fly (उड़ना) अकर्मक है — कोई प्रत्यक्ष कर्म नहीं है, इसलिए कर्ता में बढ़ाने के लिए कुछ नहीं है। इस नकारात्मक वाक्य का कोई कर्मवाच्य रूप नहीं है।Em «Birds had not flown.» (Past Perfect), o verbo fly (voar) é intransitivo — não há objeto direto, portanto não há nada para promover a sujeito. Esta oração negativa não tem forma passiva.
В «Had birds flown?» (Perfect в Past) глагол fly (летать) непереходный — прямого дополнения нет, значит, повышать в подлежащее нечего. У этого вопросительного предложения пассивной формы не существует.«Had birds flown?» (Perfect Past'da) fly (uchmoq) o'timsiz fe'l — to'g'ri to'ldiruvchi yo'q, shuning uchun egaga ko'chiradigan narsa yo'q. Bu so'roq gapning passiv shakli mavjud emas.In "Had birds flown?" (Past Perfect), the verb fly is intransitive — there is no direct object, so there is nothing to promote to subject. This interrogative sentence has no passive form.En «Had birds flown?» (Past Perfect), el verbo fly (volar) es intransitivo — no hay complemento directo, así que no hay nada que ascender a sujeto. Esta oración interrogativa no tiene forma pasiva.在「Had birds flown?」(Past Perfect)中,动词 fly(飞) 是不及物动词——没有直接宾语,因此没有可以提升为主语的成分。这个疑问句没有被动语态。«Had birds flown?» (Past Perfect) में, क्रिया fly (उड़ना) अकर्मक है — कोई प्रत्यक्ष कर्म नहीं है, इसलिए कर्ता में बढ़ाने के लिए कुछ नहीं है। इस प्रश्नवाचक वाक्य का कोई कर्मवाच्य रूप नहीं है।Em «Had birds flown?» (Past Perfect), o verbo fly (voar) é intransitivo — não há objeto direto, portanto não há nada para promover a sujeito. Esta oração interrogativa não tem forma passiva.
В «Birds will fly.» (Simple в Future) глагол fly (летать) непереходный — прямого дополнения нет, значит, повышать в подлежащее нечего. У этого утвердительного предложения пассивной формы не существует.«Birds will fly.» (Simple Future'da) fly (uchmoq) o'timsiz fe'l — to'g'ri to'ldiruvchi yo'q, shuning uchun egaga ko'chiradigan narsa yo'q. Bu darak gapning passiv shakli mavjud emas.In "Birds will fly." (Future Simple), the verb fly is intransitive — there is no direct object, so there is nothing to promote to subject. This affirmative sentence has no passive form.En «Birds will fly.» (Future Simple), el verbo fly (volar) es intransitivo — no hay complemento directo, así que no hay nada que ascender a sujeto. Esta oración afirmativa no tiene forma pasiva.在「Birds will fly.」(Future Simple)中,动词 fly(飞) 是不及物动词——没有直接宾语,因此没有可以提升为主语的成分。这个陈述句没有被动语态。«Birds will fly.» (Future Simple) में, क्रिया fly (उड़ना) अकर्मक है — कोई प्रत्यक्ष कर्म नहीं है, इसलिए कर्ता में बढ़ाने के लिए कुछ नहीं है। इस सकारात्मक वाक्य का कोई कर्मवाच्य रूप नहीं है।Em «Birds will fly.» (Future Simple), o verbo fly (voar) é intransitivo — não há objeto direto, portanto não há nada para promover a sujeito. Esta oração afirmativa não tem forma passiva.
В «Birds will not fly.» (Simple в Future) глагол fly (летать) непереходный — прямого дополнения нет, значит, повышать в подлежащее нечего. У этого отрицательного предложения пассивной формы не существует.«Birds will not fly.» (Simple Future'da) fly (uchmoq) o'timsiz fe'l — to'g'ri to'ldiruvchi yo'q, shuning uchun egaga ko'chiradigan narsa yo'q. Bu inkor gapning passiv shakli mavjud emas.In "Birds will not fly." (Future Simple), the verb fly is intransitive — there is no direct object, so there is nothing to promote to subject. This negative sentence has no passive form.En «Birds will not fly.» (Future Simple), el verbo fly (volar) es intransitivo — no hay complemento directo, así que no hay nada que ascender a sujeto. Esta oración negativa no tiene forma pasiva.在「Birds will not fly.」(Future Simple)中,动词 fly(飞) 是不及物动词——没有直接宾语,因此没有可以提升为主语的成分。这个否定句没有被动语态。«Birds will not fly.» (Future Simple) में, क्रिया fly (उड़ना) अकर्मक है — कोई प्रत्यक्ष कर्म नहीं है, इसलिए कर्ता में बढ़ाने के लिए कुछ नहीं है। इस नकारात्मक वाक्य का कोई कर्मवाच्य रूप नहीं है।Em «Birds will not fly.» (Future Simple), o verbo fly (voar) é intransitivo — não há objeto direto, portanto não há nada para promover a sujeito. Esta oração negativa não tem forma passiva.
В «Will birds fly?» (Simple в Future) глагол fly (летать) непереходный — прямого дополнения нет, значит, повышать в подлежащее нечего. У этого вопросительного предложения пассивной формы не существует.«Will birds fly?» (Simple Future'da) fly (uchmoq) o'timsiz fe'l — to'g'ri to'ldiruvchi yo'q, shuning uchun egaga ko'chiradigan narsa yo'q. Bu so'roq gapning passiv shakli mavjud emas.In "Will birds fly?" (Future Simple), the verb fly is intransitive — there is no direct object, so there is nothing to promote to subject. This interrogative sentence has no passive form.En «Will birds fly?» (Future Simple), el verbo fly (volar) es intransitivo — no hay complemento directo, así que no hay nada que ascender a sujeto. Esta oración interrogativa no tiene forma pasiva.在「Will birds fly?」(Future Simple)中,动词 fly(飞) 是不及物动词——没有直接宾语,因此没有可以提升为主语的成分。这个疑问句没有被动语态。«Will birds fly?» (Future Simple) में, क्रिया fly (उड़ना) अकर्मक है — कोई प्रत्यक्ष कर्म नहीं है, इसलिए कर्ता में बढ़ाने के लिए कुछ नहीं है। इस प्रश्नवाचक वाक्य का कोई कर्मवाच्य रूप नहीं है।Em «Will birds fly?» (Future Simple), o verbo fly (voar) é intransitivo — não há objeto direto, portanto não há nada para promover a sujeito. Esta oração interrogativa não tem forma passiva.
В «Birds will be flying.» (Continuous в Future) глагол fly (летать) непереходный — прямого дополнения нет, значит, повышать в подлежащее нечего. У этого утвердительного предложения пассивной формы не существует.«Birds will be flying.» (Continuous Future'da) fly (uchmoq) o'timsiz fe'l — to'g'ri to'ldiruvchi yo'q, shuning uchun egaga ko'chiradigan narsa yo'q. Bu darak gapning passiv shakli mavjud emas.In "Birds will be flying." (Future Continuous), the verb fly is intransitive — there is no direct object, so there is nothing to promote to subject. This affirmative sentence has no passive form.En «Birds will be flying.» (Future Continuous), el verbo fly (volar) es intransitivo — no hay complemento directo, así que no hay nada que ascender a sujeto. Esta oración afirmativa no tiene forma pasiva.在「Birds will be flying.」(Future Continuous)中,动词 fly(飞) 是不及物动词——没有直接宾语,因此没有可以提升为主语的成分。这个陈述句没有被动语态。«Birds will be flying.» (Future Continuous) में, क्रिया fly (उड़ना) अकर्मक है — कोई प्रत्यक्ष कर्म नहीं है, इसलिए कर्ता में बढ़ाने के लिए कुछ नहीं है। इस सकारात्मक वाक्य का कोई कर्मवाच्य रूप नहीं है।Em «Birds will be flying.» (Future Continuous), o verbo fly (voar) é intransitivo — não há objeto direto, portanto não há nada para promover a sujeito. Esta oração afirmativa não tem forma passiva.
В «Birds will not be flying.» (Continuous в Future) глагол fly (летать) непереходный — прямого дополнения нет, значит, повышать в подлежащее нечего. У этого отрицательного предложения пассивной формы не существует.«Birds will not be flying.» (Continuous Future'da) fly (uchmoq) o'timsiz fe'l — to'g'ri to'ldiruvchi yo'q, shuning uchun egaga ko'chiradigan narsa yo'q. Bu inkor gapning passiv shakli mavjud emas.In "Birds will not be flying." (Future Continuous), the verb fly is intransitive — there is no direct object, so there is nothing to promote to subject. This negative sentence has no passive form.En «Birds will not be flying.» (Future Continuous), el verbo fly (volar) es intransitivo — no hay complemento directo, así que no hay nada que ascender a sujeto. Esta oración negativa no tiene forma pasiva.在「Birds will not be flying.」(Future Continuous)中,动词 fly(飞) 是不及物动词——没有直接宾语,因此没有可以提升为主语的成分。这个否定句没有被动语态。«Birds will not be flying.» (Future Continuous) में, क्रिया fly (उड़ना) अकर्मक है — कोई प्रत्यक्ष कर्म नहीं है, इसलिए कर्ता में बढ़ाने के लिए कुछ नहीं है। इस नकारात्मक वाक्य का कोई कर्मवाच्य रूप नहीं है।Em «Birds will not be flying.» (Future Continuous), o verbo fly (voar) é intransitivo — não há objeto direto, portanto não há nada para promover a sujeito. Esta oração negativa não tem forma passiva.
В «Will birds be flying?» (Continuous в Future) глагол fly (летать) непереходный — прямого дополнения нет, значит, повышать в подлежащее нечего. У этого вопросительного предложения пассивной формы не существует.«Will birds be flying?» (Continuous Future'da) fly (uchmoq) o'timsiz fe'l — to'g'ri to'ldiruvchi yo'q, shuning uchun egaga ko'chiradigan narsa yo'q. Bu so'roq gapning passiv shakli mavjud emas.In "Will birds be flying?" (Future Continuous), the verb fly is intransitive — there is no direct object, so there is nothing to promote to subject. This interrogative sentence has no passive form.En «Will birds be flying?» (Future Continuous), el verbo fly (volar) es intransitivo — no hay complemento directo, así que no hay nada que ascender a sujeto. Esta oración interrogativa no tiene forma pasiva.在「Will birds be flying?」(Future Continuous)中,动词 fly(飞) 是不及物动词——没有直接宾语,因此没有可以提升为主语的成分。这个疑问句没有被动语态。«Will birds be flying?» (Future Continuous) में, क्रिया fly (उड़ना) अकर्मक है — कोई प्रत्यक्ष कर्म नहीं है, इसलिए कर्ता में बढ़ाने के लिए कुछ नहीं है। इस प्रश्नवाचक वाक्य का कोई कर्मवाच्य रूप नहीं है।Em «Will birds be flying?» (Future Continuous), o verbo fly (voar) é intransitivo — não há objeto direto, portanto não há nada para promover a sujeito. Esta oração interrogativa não tem forma passiva.
В «Birds will have flown.» (Perfect в Future) глагол fly (летать) непереходный — прямого дополнения нет, значит, повышать в подлежащее нечего. У этого утвердительного предложения пассивной формы не существует.«Birds will have flown.» (Perfect Future'da) fly (uchmoq) o'timsiz fe'l — to'g'ri to'ldiruvchi yo'q, shuning uchun egaga ko'chiradigan narsa yo'q. Bu darak gapning passiv shakli mavjud emas.In "Birds will have flown." (Future Perfect), the verb fly is intransitive — there is no direct object, so there is nothing to promote to subject. This affirmative sentence has no passive form.En «Birds will have flown.» (Future Perfect), el verbo fly (volar) es intransitivo — no hay complemento directo, así que no hay nada que ascender a sujeto. Esta oración afirmativa no tiene forma pasiva.在「Birds will have flown.」(Future Perfect)中,动词 fly(飞) 是不及物动词——没有直接宾语,因此没有可以提升为主语的成分。这个陈述句没有被动语态。«Birds will have flown.» (Future Perfect) में, क्रिया fly (उड़ना) अकर्मक है — कोई प्रत्यक्ष कर्म नहीं है, इसलिए कर्ता में बढ़ाने के लिए कुछ नहीं है। इस सकारात्मक वाक्य का कोई कर्मवाच्य रूप नहीं है।Em «Birds will have flown.» (Future Perfect), o verbo fly (voar) é intransitivo — não há objeto direto, portanto não há nada para promover a sujeito. Esta oração afirmativa não tem forma passiva.
В «Birds will not have flown.» (Perfect в Future) глагол fly (летать) непереходный — прямого дополнения нет, значит, повышать в подлежащее нечего. У этого отрицательного предложения пассивной формы не существует.«Birds will not have flown.» (Perfect Future'da) fly (uchmoq) o'timsiz fe'l — to'g'ri to'ldiruvchi yo'q, shuning uchun egaga ko'chiradigan narsa yo'q. Bu inkor gapning passiv shakli mavjud emas.In "Birds will not have flown." (Future Perfect), the verb fly is intransitive — there is no direct object, so there is nothing to promote to subject. This negative sentence has no passive form.En «Birds will not have flown.» (Future Perfect), el verbo fly (volar) es intransitivo — no hay complemento directo, así que no hay nada que ascender a sujeto. Esta oración negativa no tiene forma pasiva.在「Birds will not have flown.」(Future Perfect)中,动词 fly(飞) 是不及物动词——没有直接宾语,因此没有可以提升为主语的成分。这个否定句没有被动语态。«Birds will not have flown.» (Future Perfect) में, क्रिया fly (उड़ना) अकर्मक है — कोई प्रत्यक्ष कर्म नहीं है, इसलिए कर्ता में बढ़ाने के लिए कुछ नहीं है। इस नकारात्मक वाक्य का कोई कर्मवाच्य रूप नहीं है।Em «Birds will not have flown.» (Future Perfect), o verbo fly (voar) é intransitivo — não há objeto direto, portanto não há nada para promover a sujeito. Esta oração negativa não tem forma passiva.
В «Will birds have flown?» (Perfect в Future) глагол fly (летать) непереходный — прямого дополнения нет, значит, повышать в подлежащее нечего. У этого вопросительного предложения пассивной формы не существует.«Will birds have flown?» (Perfect Future'da) fly (uchmoq) o'timsiz fe'l — to'g'ri to'ldiruvchi yo'q, shuning uchun egaga ko'chiradigan narsa yo'q. Bu so'roq gapning passiv shakli mavjud emas.In "Will birds have flown?" (Future Perfect), the verb fly is intransitive — there is no direct object, so there is nothing to promote to subject. This interrogative sentence has no passive form.En «Will birds have flown?» (Future Perfect), el verbo fly (volar) es intransitivo — no hay complemento directo, así que no hay nada que ascender a sujeto. Esta oración interrogativa no tiene forma pasiva.在「Will birds have flown?」(Future Perfect)中,动词 fly(飞) 是不及物动词——没有直接宾语,因此没有可以提升为主语的成分。这个疑问句没有被动语态。«Will birds have flown?» (Future Perfect) में, क्रिया fly (उड़ना) अकर्मक है — कोई प्रत्यक्ष कर्म नहीं है, इसलिए कर्ता में बढ़ाने के लिए कुछ नहीं है। इस प्रश्नवाचक वाक्य का कोई कर्मवाच्य रूप नहीं है।Em «Will birds have flown?» (Future Perfect), o verbo fly (voar) é intransitivo — não há objeto direto, portanto não há nada para promover a sujeito. Esta oração interrogativa não tem forma passiva.
S + V
S + V + NOT (do-support)
V(aux) + S + V
—
Минимальное ядро предложения — только подлежащее и сказуемое.Gapning minimal yadrosi — faqat ega va kesim.The minimal core of a sentence — just the subject and predicate.El núcleo mínimo de la oración — solo sujeto y predicado.句子的最简核心——只有主语和谓语。वाक्य का न्यूनतम मूल — केवल कर्ता और विधेय।O núcleo mínimo da oração — apenas sujeito e predicado.
У смыслового глагола нет своего вспомогательного, поэтому появляется «пустой» do/does/did — только чтобы было к чему пристегнуть not. В Future эту роль уже играет само will.Mustaqil fe'lning o'z yordamchisi yo'q, shuning uchun faqat notni ulash uchun «bo'sh» do/does/did paydo bo'ladi. Future'da bu vazifani willning o'zi bajaradi.The main verb has no auxiliary of its own, so an «empty» do/does/did appears — only to give not something to attach to. In the Future, will itself already plays this role.El verbo principal no tiene su propio auxiliar, por lo que aparece un do/does/did «vacío» — solo para que not tenga algo a lo que engancharse. En el Future, will ya cumple ese papel por sí mismo.实义动词没有自己的助动词,因此会出现一个「空」的 do/does/did——只是为了让 not 有可以附着的对象。在 Future 中,will 本身已经承担了这个角色。मुख्य क्रिया का अपना कोई सहायक क्रिया नहीं होती, इसलिए एक «खाली» do/does/did प्रकट होता है — केवल इसलिए कि not को जोड़ने के लिए कुछ हो। Future में यह भूमिका पहले से ही will स्वयं निभाता है।O verbo principal não tem auxiliar próprio, por isso aparece um do/does/did «vazio» — apenas para que not tenha algo a que se prender. No Future, é o próprio will que já desempenha esse papel.
Тот же вспомогательный (do/does/did/will) в вопросе выходит перед подлежащим — это и есть инверсия.Xuddi shu yordamchi (do/does/did/will) savolda egadan oldinga chiqadi — bu inversiya deb ataladi.That same auxiliary (do/does/did/will) moves in front of the subject in a question — that is inversion.Ese mismo auxiliar (do/does/did/will) se coloca delante del sujeto en la pregunta — eso es la inversión.同一个助动词(do/does/did/will)在疑问句中会移到主语之前——这就是倒装。वही सहायक क्रिया (do/does/did/will) प्रश्न में कर्ता से पहले आ जाती है — यही व्युत्क्रम (inversion) कहलाता है।Esse mesmo auxiliar (do/does/did/will) vem antes do sujeito na pergunta — isso é a inversão.
В «Birds fly.» (Simple в Present) глагол fly (летать) непереходный — прямого дополнения нет, значит, повышать в подлежащее нечего. У этого утвердительного предложения пассивной формы не существует.«Birds fly.» (Simple Present'da) fly (uchmoq) o'timsiz fe'l — to'g'ri to'ldiruvchi yo'q, shuning uchun egaga ko'chiradigan narsa yo'q. Bu darak gapning passiv shakli mavjud emas.In "Birds fly." (Present Simple), the verb fly is intransitive — there is no direct object, so there is nothing to promote to subject. This affirmative sentence has no passive form.En «Birds fly.» (Present Simple), el verbo fly (volar) es intransitivo — no hay complemento directo, así que no hay nada que ascender a sujeto. Esta oración afirmativa no tiene forma pasiva.在「Birds fly.」(Present Simple)中,动词 fly(飞) 是不及物动词——没有直接宾语,因此没有可以提升为主语的成分。这个陈述句没有被动语态。«Birds fly.» (Present Simple) में, क्रिया fly (उड़ना) अकर्मक है — कोई प्रत्यक्ष कर्म नहीं है, इसलिए कर्ता में बढ़ाने के लिए कुछ नहीं है। इस सकारात्मक वाक्य का कोई कर्मवाच्य रूप नहीं है।Em «Birds fly.» (Present Simple), o verbo fly (voar) é intransitivo — não há objeto direto, portanto não há nada para promover a sujeito. Esta oração afirmativa não tem forma passiva.
2
My clever dog barks loudly.
My clever dog does not bark loudly.
Does my clever dog bark loudly?
My clever dog is barking loudly.
My clever dog is not barking loudly.
Is my clever dog barking loudly?
My clever dog has barked loudly.
My clever dog has not barked loudly.
Has my clever dog barked loudly?
My clever dog barked loudly.
My clever dog did not bark loudly.
Did my clever dog bark loudly?
My clever dog was barking loudly.
My clever dog was not barking loudly.
Was my clever dog barking loudly?
My clever dog had barked loudly.
My clever dog had not barked loudly.
Had my clever dog barked loudly?
My clever dog will bark loudly.
My clever dog will not bark loudly.
Will my clever dog bark loudly?
My clever dog will be barking loudly.
My clever dog will not be barking loudly.
Will my clever dog be barking loudly?
My clever dog will have barked loudly.
My clever dog will not have barked loudly.
Will my clever dog have barked loudly?
В «My clever dog barks loudly.» (Simple в Present) глагол bark (лаять) непереходный — прямого дополнения нет, значит, повышать в подлежащее нечего. У этого утвердительного предложения пассивной формы не существует.«My clever dog barks loudly.» (Simple Present'da) bark (hurmoq) o'timsiz fe'l — to'g'ri to'ldiruvchi yo'q, shuning uchun egaga ko'chiradigan narsa yo'q. Bu darak gapning passiv shakli mavjud emas.In "My clever dog barks loudly." (Present Simple), the verb bark is intransitive — there is no direct object, so there is nothing to promote to subject. This affirmative sentence has no passive form.En «My clever dog barks loudly.» (Present Simple), el verbo bark (ladrar) es intransitivo — no hay complemento directo, así que no hay nada que ascender a sujeto. Esta oración afirmativa no tiene forma pasiva.在「My clever dog barks loudly.」(Present Simple)中,动词 bark(叫) 是不及物动词——没有直接宾语,因此没有可以提升为主语的成分。这个陈述句没有被动语态。«My clever dog barks loudly.» (Present Simple) में, क्रिया bark (भौंकना) अकर्मक है — कोई प्रत्यक्ष कर्म नहीं है, इसलिए कर्ता में बढ़ाने के लिए कुछ नहीं है। इस सकारात्मक वाक्य का कोई कर्मवाच्य रूप नहीं है।Em «My clever dog barks loudly.» (Present Simple), o verbo bark (latir) é intransitivo — não há objeto direto, portanto não há nada para promover a sujeito. Esta oração afirmativa não tem forma passiva.
В «My clever dog does not bark loudly.» (Simple в Present) глагол bark (лаять) непереходный — прямого дополнения нет, значит, повышать в подлежащее нечего. У этого отрицательного предложения пассивной формы не существует.«My clever dog does not bark loudly.» (Simple Present'da) bark (hurmoq) o'timsiz fe'l — to'g'ri to'ldiruvchi yo'q, shuning uchun egaga ko'chiradigan narsa yo'q. Bu inkor gapning passiv shakli mavjud emas.In "My clever dog does not bark loudly." (Present Simple), the verb bark is intransitive — there is no direct object, so there is nothing to promote to subject. This negative sentence has no passive form.En «My clever dog does not bark loudly.» (Present Simple), el verbo bark (ladrar) es intransitivo — no hay complemento directo, así que no hay nada que ascender a sujeto. Esta oración negativa no tiene forma pasiva.在「My clever dog does not bark loudly.」(Present Simple)中,动词 bark(叫) 是不及物动词——没有直接宾语,因此没有可以提升为主语的成分。这个否定句没有被动语态。«My clever dog does not bark loudly.» (Present Simple) में, क्रिया bark (भौंकना) अकर्मक है — कोई प्रत्यक्ष कर्म नहीं है, इसलिए कर्ता में बढ़ाने के लिए कुछ नहीं है। इस नकारात्मक वाक्य का कोई कर्मवाच्य रूप नहीं है।Em «My clever dog does not bark loudly.» (Present Simple), o verbo bark (latir) é intransitivo — não há objeto direto, portanto não há nada para promover a sujeito. Esta oração negativa não tem forma passiva.
В «Does my clever dog bark loudly?» (Simple в Present) глагол bark (лаять) непереходный — прямого дополнения нет, значит, повышать в подлежащее нечего. У этого вопросительного предложения пассивной формы не существует.«Does my clever dog bark loudly?» (Simple Present'da) bark (hurmoq) o'timsiz fe'l — to'g'ri to'ldiruvchi yo'q, shuning uchun egaga ko'chiradigan narsa yo'q. Bu so'roq gapning passiv shakli mavjud emas.In "Does my clever dog bark loudly?" (Present Simple), the verb bark is intransitive — there is no direct object, so there is nothing to promote to subject. This interrogative sentence has no passive form.En «Does my clever dog bark loudly?» (Present Simple), el verbo bark (ladrar) es intransitivo — no hay complemento directo, así que no hay nada que ascender a sujeto. Esta oración interrogativa no tiene forma pasiva.在「Does my clever dog bark loudly?」(Present Simple)中,动词 bark(叫) 是不及物动词——没有直接宾语,因此没有可以提升为主语的成分。这个疑问句没有被动语态。«Does my clever dog bark loudly?» (Present Simple) में, क्रिया bark (भौंकना) अकर्मक है — कोई प्रत्यक्ष कर्म नहीं है, इसलिए कर्ता में बढ़ाने के लिए कुछ नहीं है। इस प्रश्नवाचक वाक्य का कोई कर्मवाच्य रूप नहीं है।Em «Does my clever dog bark loudly?» (Present Simple), o verbo bark (latir) é intransitivo — não há objeto direto, portanto não há nada para promover a sujeito. Esta oração interrogativa não tem forma passiva.
В «My clever dog is barking loudly.» (Continuous в Present) глагол bark (лаять) непереходный — прямого дополнения нет, значит, повышать в подлежащее нечего. У этого утвердительного предложения пассивной формы не существует.«My clever dog is barking loudly.» (Continuous Present'da) bark (hurmoq) o'timsiz fe'l — to'g'ri to'ldiruvchi yo'q, shuning uchun egaga ko'chiradigan narsa yo'q. Bu darak gapning passiv shakli mavjud emas.In "My clever dog is barking loudly." (Present Continuous), the verb bark is intransitive — there is no direct object, so there is nothing to promote to subject. This affirmative sentence has no passive form.En «My clever dog is barking loudly.» (Present Continuous), el verbo bark (ladrar) es intransitivo — no hay complemento directo, así que no hay nada que ascender a sujeto. Esta oración afirmativa no tiene forma pasiva.在「My clever dog is barking loudly.」(Present Continuous)中,动词 bark(叫) 是不及物动词——没有直接宾语,因此没有可以提升为主语的成分。这个陈述句没有被动语态。«My clever dog is barking loudly.» (Present Continuous) में, क्रिया bark (भौंकना) अकर्मक है — कोई प्रत्यक्ष कर्म नहीं है, इसलिए कर्ता में बढ़ाने के लिए कुछ नहीं है। इस सकारात्मक वाक्य का कोई कर्मवाच्य रूप नहीं है।Em «My clever dog is barking loudly.» (Present Continuous), o verbo bark (latir) é intransitivo — não há objeto direto, portanto não há nada para promover a sujeito. Esta oração afirmativa não tem forma passiva.
В «My clever dog is not barking loudly.» (Continuous в Present) глагол bark (лаять) непереходный — прямого дополнения нет, значит, повышать в подлежащее нечего. У этого отрицательного предложения пассивной формы не существует.«My clever dog is not barking loudly.» (Continuous Present'da) bark (hurmoq) o'timsiz fe'l — to'g'ri to'ldiruvchi yo'q, shuning uchun egaga ko'chiradigan narsa yo'q. Bu inkor gapning passiv shakli mavjud emas.In "My clever dog is not barking loudly." (Present Continuous), the verb bark is intransitive — there is no direct object, so there is nothing to promote to subject. This negative sentence has no passive form.En «My clever dog is not barking loudly.» (Present Continuous), el verbo bark (ladrar) es intransitivo — no hay complemento directo, así que no hay nada que ascender a sujeto. Esta oración negativa no tiene forma pasiva.在「My clever dog is not barking loudly.」(Present Continuous)中,动词 bark(叫) 是不及物动词——没有直接宾语,因此没有可以提升为主语的成分。这个否定句没有被动语态。«My clever dog is not barking loudly.» (Present Continuous) में, क्रिया bark (भौंकना) अकर्मक है — कोई प्रत्यक्ष कर्म नहीं है, इसलिए कर्ता में बढ़ाने के लिए कुछ नहीं है। इस नकारात्मक वाक्य का कोई कर्मवाच्य रूप नहीं है।Em «My clever dog is not barking loudly.» (Present Continuous), o verbo bark (latir) é intransitivo — não há objeto direto, portanto não há nada para promover a sujeito. Esta oração negativa não tem forma passiva.
В «Is my clever dog barking loudly?» (Continuous в Present) глагол bark (лаять) непереходный — прямого дополнения нет, значит, повышать в подлежащее нечего. У этого вопросительного предложения пассивной формы не существует.«Is my clever dog barking loudly?» (Continuous Present'da) bark (hurmoq) o'timsiz fe'l — to'g'ri to'ldiruvchi yo'q, shuning uchun egaga ko'chiradigan narsa yo'q. Bu so'roq gapning passiv shakli mavjud emas.In "Is my clever dog barking loudly?" (Present Continuous), the verb bark is intransitive — there is no direct object, so there is nothing to promote to subject. This interrogative sentence has no passive form.En «Is my clever dog barking loudly?» (Present Continuous), el verbo bark (ladrar) es intransitivo — no hay complemento directo, así que no hay nada que ascender a sujeto. Esta oración interrogativa no tiene forma pasiva.在「Is my clever dog barking loudly?」(Present Continuous)中,动词 bark(叫) 是不及物动词——没有直接宾语,因此没有可以提升为主语的成分。这个疑问句没有被动语态。«Is my clever dog barking loudly?» (Present Continuous) में, क्रिया bark (भौंकना) अकर्मक है — कोई प्रत्यक्ष कर्म नहीं है, इसलिए कर्ता में बढ़ाने के लिए कुछ नहीं है। इस प्रश्नवाचक वाक्य का कोई कर्मवाच्य रूप नहीं है।Em «Is my clever dog barking loudly?» (Present Continuous), o verbo bark (latir) é intransitivo — não há objeto direto, portanto não há nada para promover a sujeito. Esta oração interrogativa não tem forma passiva.
В «My clever dog has barked loudly.» (Perfect в Present) глагол bark (лаять) непереходный — прямого дополнения нет, значит, повышать в подлежащее нечего. У этого утвердительного предложения пассивной формы не существует.«My clever dog has barked loudly.» (Perfect Present'da) bark (hurmoq) o'timsiz fe'l — to'g'ri to'ldiruvchi yo'q, shuning uchun egaga ko'chiradigan narsa yo'q. Bu darak gapning passiv shakli mavjud emas.In "My clever dog has barked loudly." (Present Perfect), the verb bark is intransitive — there is no direct object, so there is nothing to promote to subject. This affirmative sentence has no passive form.En «My clever dog has barked loudly.» (Present Perfect), el verbo bark (ladrar) es intransitivo — no hay complemento directo, así que no hay nada que ascender a sujeto. Esta oración afirmativa no tiene forma pasiva.在「My clever dog has barked loudly.」(Present Perfect)中,动词 bark(叫) 是不及物动词——没有直接宾语,因此没有可以提升为主语的成分。这个陈述句没有被动语态。«My clever dog has barked loudly.» (Present Perfect) में, क्रिया bark (भौंकना) अकर्मक है — कोई प्रत्यक्ष कर्म नहीं है, इसलिए कर्ता में बढ़ाने के लिए कुछ नहीं है। इस सकारात्मक वाक्य का कोई कर्मवाच्य रूप नहीं है।Em «My clever dog has barked loudly.» (Present Perfect), o verbo bark (latir) é intransitivo — não há objeto direto, portanto não há nada para promover a sujeito. Esta oração afirmativa não tem forma passiva.
В «My clever dog has not barked loudly.» (Perfect в Present) глагол bark (лаять) непереходный — прямого дополнения нет, значит, повышать в подлежащее нечего. У этого отрицательного предложения пассивной формы не существует.«My clever dog has not barked loudly.» (Perfect Present'da) bark (hurmoq) o'timsiz fe'l — to'g'ri to'ldiruvchi yo'q, shuning uchun egaga ko'chiradigan narsa yo'q. Bu inkor gapning passiv shakli mavjud emas.In "My clever dog has not barked loudly." (Present Perfect) the verb bark (to bark) is intransitive — there is no direct object, so there is nothing to promote to the subject. This negative sentence has no passive form.En «My clever dog has not barked loudly.» (Presente Perfecto) el verbo bark (ladrar) es intransitivo — no hay complemento directo, por lo que no hay nada que ascender a sujeto. Esta oración negativa no tiene forma pasiva.在“My clever dog has not barked loudly.”(现在完成时)中,动词 bark(吠叫)是不及物动词——没有直接宾语,因此没有什么可以提升为主语。这个否定句没有被动语态形式。«My clever dog has not barked loudly.» (वर्तमान पूर्ण काल) में, क्रिया bark (भौंकना) अकर्मक है — कोई प्रत्यक्ष कर्म नहीं है, इसलिए कर्ता में बढ़ाने के लिए कुछ नहीं है। इस नकारात्मक वाक्य का कोई कर्मवाच्य रूप नहीं है।Em «My clever dog has not barked loudly.» (Presente Perfeito) o verbo bark (latir) é intransitivo — não há objeto direto, então não há nada para promover a sujeito. Esta oração negativa não tem forma passiva.
В «Has my clever dog barked loudly?» (Perfect в Present) глагол bark (лаять) непереходный — прямого дополнения нет, значит, повышать в подлежащее нечего. У этого вопросительного предложения пассивной формы не существует.«Has my clever dog barked loudly?» (Perfect Present'da) bark (hurmoq) o'timsiz fe'l — to'g'ri to'ldiruvchi yo'q, shuning uchun egaga ko'chiradigan narsa yo'q. Bu so'roq gapning passiv shakli mavjud emas.In "Has my clever dog barked loudly?" (Present Perfect) the verb bark (to bark) is intransitive — there is no direct object, so there is nothing to promote to the subject. This interrogative sentence has no passive form.En «Has my clever dog barked loudly?» (Presente Perfecto) el verbo bark (ladrar) es intransitivo — no hay complemento directo, por lo que no hay nada que ascender a sujeto. Esta oración interrogativa no tiene forma pasiva.在“Has my clever dog barked loudly?”(现在完成时)中,动词 bark(吠叫)是不及物动词——没有直接宾语,因此没有什么可以提升为主语。这个疑问句没有被动语态形式。«Has my clever dog barked loudly?» (वर्तमान पूर्ण काल) में, क्रिया bark (भौंकना) अकर्मक है — कोई प्रत्यक्ष कर्म नहीं है, इसलिए कर्ता में बढ़ाने के लिए कुछ नहीं है। इस प्रश्नवाचक वाक्य का कोई कर्मवाच्य रूप नहीं है।Em «Has my clever dog barked loudly?» (Presente Perfeito) o verbo bark (latir) é intransitivo — não há objeto direto, então não há nada para promover a sujeito. Esta oração interrogativa não tem forma passiva.
В «My clever dog barked loudly.» (Simple в Past) глагол bark (лаять) непереходный — прямого дополнения нет, значит, повышать в подлежащее нечего. У этого утвердительного предложения пассивной формы не существует.«My clever dog barked loudly.» (Simple Past'da) bark (hurmoq) o'timsiz fe'l — to'g'ri to'ldiruvchi yo'q, shuning uchun egaga ko'chiradigan narsa yo'q. Bu darak gapning passiv shakli mavjud emas.In "My clever dog barked loudly." (Past Simple) the verb bark (to bark) is intransitive — there is no direct object, so there is nothing to promote to the subject. This affirmative sentence has no passive form.En «My clever dog barked loudly.» (Pasado Simple) el verbo bark (ladrar) es intransitivo — no hay complemento directo, por lo que no hay nada que ascender a sujeto. Esta oración afirmativa no tiene forma pasiva.在“My clever dog barked loudly.”(一般过去时)中,动词 bark(吠叫)是不及物动词——没有直接宾语,因此没有什么可以提升为主语。这个陈述句没有被动语态形式。«My clever dog barked loudly.» (सामान्य भूतकाल) में, क्रिया bark (भौंकना) अकर्मक है — कोई प्रत्यक्ष कर्म नहीं है, इसलिए कर्ता में बढ़ाने के लिए कुछ नहीं है। इस सकारात्मक वाक्य का कोई कर्मवाच्य रूप नहीं है।Em «My clever dog barked loudly.» (Passado Simples) o verbo bark (latir) é intransitivo — não há objeto direto, então não há nada para promover a sujeito. Esta oração afirmativa não tem forma passiva.
В «My clever dog did not bark loudly.» (Simple в Past) глагол bark (лаять) непереходный — прямого дополнения нет, значит, повышать в подлежащее нечего. У этого отрицательного предложения пассивной формы не существует.«My clever dog did not bark loudly.» (Simple Past'da) bark (hurmoq) o'timsiz fe'l — to'g'ri to'ldiruvchi yo'q, shuning uchun egaga ko'chiradigan narsa yo'q. Bu inkor gapning passiv shakli mavjud emas.In "My clever dog did not bark loudly." (Past Simple) the verb bark (to bark) is intransitive — there is no direct object, so there is nothing to promote to the subject. This negative sentence has no passive form.En «My clever dog did not bark loudly.» (Pasado Simple) el verbo bark (ladrar) es intransitivo — no hay complemento directo, por lo que no hay nada que ascender a sujeto. Esta oración negativa no tiene forma pasiva.在“My clever dog did not bark loudly.”(一般过去时)中,动词 bark(吠叫)是不及物动词——没有直接宾语,因此没有什么可以提升为主语。这个否定句没有被动语态形式。«My clever dog did not bark loudly.» (सामान्य भूतकाल) में, क्रिया bark (भौंकना) अकर्मक है — कोई प्रत्यक्ष कर्म नहीं है, इसलिए कर्ता में बढ़ाने के लिए कुछ नहीं है। इस नकारात्मक वाक्य का कोई कर्मवाच्य रूप नहीं है।Em «My clever dog did not bark loudly.» (Passado Simples) o verbo bark (latir) é intransitivo — não há objeto direto, então não há nada para promover a sujeito. Esta oração negativa não tem forma passiva.
В «Did my clever dog bark loudly?» (Simple в Past) глагол bark (лаять) непереходный — прямого дополнения нет, значит, повышать в подлежащее нечего. У этого вопросительного предложения пассивной формы не существует.«Did my clever dog bark loudly?» (Simple Past'da) bark (hurmoq) o'timsiz fe'l — to'g'ri to'ldiruvchi yo'q, shuning uchun egaga ko'chiradigan narsa yo'q. Bu so'roq gapning passiv shakli mavjud emas.In "Did my clever dog bark loudly?" (Past Simple) the verb bark (to bark) is intransitive — there is no direct object, so there is nothing to promote to the subject. This interrogative sentence has no passive form.En «Did my clever dog bark loudly?» (Pasado Simple) el verbo bark (ladrar) es intransitivo — no hay complemento directo, por lo que no hay nada que ascender a sujeto. Esta oración interrogativa no tiene forma pasiva.在“Did my clever dog bark loudly?”(一般过去时)中,动词 bark(吠叫)是不及物动词——没有直接宾语,因此没有什么可以提升为主语。这个疑问句没有被动语态形式。«Did my clever dog bark loudly?» (सामान्य भूतकाल) में, क्रिया bark (भौंकना) अकर्मक है — कोई प्रत्यक्ष कर्म नहीं है, इसलिए कर्ता में बढ़ाने के लिए कुछ नहीं है। इस प्रश्नवाचक वाक्य का कोई कर्मवाच्य रूप नहीं है।Em «Did my clever dog bark loudly?» (Passado Simples) o verbo bark (latir) é intransitivo — não há objeto direto, então não há nada para promover a sujeito. Esta oração interrogativa não tem forma passiva.
В «My clever dog was barking loudly.» (Continuous в Past) глагол bark (лаять) непереходный — прямого дополнения нет, значит, повышать в подлежащее нечего. У этого утвердительного предложения пассивной формы не существует.«My clever dog was barking loudly.» (Continuous Past'da) bark (hurmoq) o'timsiz fe'l — to'g'ri to'ldiruvchi yo'q, shuning uchun egaga ko'chiradigan narsa yo'q. Bu darak gapning passiv shakli mavjud emas.In "My clever dog was barking loudly." (Past Continuous) the verb bark (to bark) is intransitive — there is no direct object, so there is nothing to promote to the subject. This affirmative sentence has no passive form.En «My clever dog was barking loudly.» (Pasado Continuo) el verbo bark (ladrar) es intransitivo — no hay complemento directo, por lo que no hay nada que ascender a sujeto. Esta oración afirmativa no tiene forma pasiva.在“My clever dog was barking loudly.”(过去进行时)中,动词 bark(吠叫)是不及物动词——没有直接宾语,因此没有什么可以提升为主语。这个陈述句没有被动语态形式。«My clever dog was barking loudly.» (भूत निरंतर काल) में, क्रिया bark (भौंकना) अकर्मक है — कोई प्रत्यक्ष कर्म नहीं है, इसलिए कर्ता में बढ़ाने के लिए कुछ नहीं है। इस सकारात्मक वाक्य का कोई कर्मवाच्य रूप नहीं है।Em «My clever dog was barking loudly.» (Passado Contínuo) o verbo bark (latir) é intransitivo — não há objeto direto, então não há nada para promover a sujeito. Esta oração afirmativa não tem forma passiva.
В «My clever dog was not barking loudly.» (Continuous в Past) глагол bark (лаять) непереходный — прямого дополнения нет, значит, повышать в подлежащее нечего. У этого отрицательного предложения пассивной формы не существует.«My clever dog was not barking loudly.» (Continuous Past'da) bark (hurmoq) o'timsiz fe'l — to'g'ri to'ldiruvchi yo'q, shuning uchun egaga ko'chiradigan narsa yo'q. Bu inkor gapning passiv shakli mavjud emas.In "My clever dog was not barking loudly." (Past Continuous) the verb bark (to bark) is intransitive — there is no direct object, so there is nothing to promote to the subject. This negative sentence has no passive form.En «My clever dog was not barking loudly.» (Pasado Continuo) el verbo bark (ladrar) es intransitivo — no hay complemento directo, por lo que no hay nada que ascender a sujeto. Esta oración negativa no tiene forma pasiva.在“My clever dog was not barking loudly.”(过去进行时)中,动词 bark(吠叫)是不及物动词——没有直接宾语,因此没有什么可以提升为主语。这个否定句没有被动语态形式。«My clever dog was not barking loudly.» (भूत निरंतर काल) में, क्रिया bark (भौंकना) अकर्मक है — कोई प्रत्यक्ष कर्म नहीं है, इसलिए कर्ता में बढ़ाने के लिए कुछ नहीं है। इस नकारात्मक वाक्य का कोई कर्मवाच्य रूप नहीं है।Em «My clever dog was not barking loudly.» (Passado Contínuo) o verbo bark (latir) é intransitivo — não há objeto direto, então não há nada para promover a sujeito. Esta oração negativa não tem forma passiva.
В «Was my clever dog barking loudly?» (Continuous в Past) глагол bark (лаять) непереходный — прямого дополнения нет, значит, повышать в подлежащее нечего. У этого вопросительного предложения пассивной формы не существует.«Was my clever dog barking loudly?» (Continuous Past'da) bark (hurmoq) o'timsiz fe'l — to'g'ri to'ldiruvchi yo'q, shuning uchun egaga ko'chiradigan narsa yo'q. Bu so'roq gapning passiv shakli mavjud emas.In "Was my clever dog barking loudly?" (Past Continuous) the verb bark (to bark) is intransitive — there is no direct object, so there is nothing to promote to the subject. This interrogative sentence has no passive form.En «Was my clever dog barking loudly?» (Pasado Continuo) el verbo bark (ladrar) es intransitivo — no hay complemento directo, por lo que no hay nada que ascender a sujeto. Esta oración interrogativa no tiene forma pasiva.在“Was my clever dog barking loudly?”(过去进行时)中,动词 bark(吠叫)是不及物动词——没有直接宾语,因此没有什么可以提升为主语。这个疑问句没有被动语态形式。«Was my clever dog barking loudly?» (भूत निरंतर काल) में, क्रिया bark (भौंकना) अकर्मक है — कोई प्रत्यक्ष कर्म नहीं है, इसलिए कर्ता में बढ़ाने के लिए कुछ नहीं है। इस प्रश्नवाचक वाक्य का कोई कर्मवाच्य रूप नहीं है।Em «Was my clever dog barking loudly?» (Passado Contínuo) o verbo bark (latir) é intransitivo — não há objeto direto, então não há nada para promover a sujeito. Esta oração interrogativa não tem forma passiva.
В «My clever dog had barked loudly.» (Perfect в Past) глагол bark (лаять) непереходный — прямого дополнения нет, значит, повышать в подлежащее нечего. У этого утвердительного предложения пассивной формы не существует.«My clever dog had barked loudly.» (Perfect Past'da) bark (hurmoq) o'timsiz fe'l — to'g'ri to'ldiruvchi yo'q, shuning uchun egaga ko'chiradigan narsa yo'q. Bu darak gapning passiv shakli mavjud emas.In "My clever dog had barked loudly." (Past Perfect) the verb bark (to bark) is intransitive — there is no direct object, so there is nothing to promote to the subject. This affirmative sentence has no passive form.En «My clever dog had barked loudly.» (Pasado Perfecto) el verbo bark (ladrar) es intransitivo — no hay complemento directo, por lo que no hay nada que ascender a sujeto. Esta oración afirmativa no tiene forma pasiva.在“My clever dog had barked loudly.”(过去完成时)中,动词 bark(吠叫)是不及物动词——没有直接宾语,因此没有什么可以提升为主语。这个陈述句没有被动语态形式。«My clever dog had barked loudly.» (पूर्ण भूतकाल) में, क्रिया bark (भौंकना) अकर्मक है — कोई प्रत्यक्ष कर्म नहीं है, इसलिए कर्ता में बढ़ाने के लिए कुछ नहीं है। इस सकारात्मक वाक्य का कोई कर्मवाच्य रूप नहीं है।Em «My clever dog had barked loudly.» (Passado Perfeito) o verbo bark (latir) é intransitivo — não há objeto direto, então não há nada para promover a sujeito. Esta oração afirmativa não tem forma passiva.
В «My clever dog had not barked loudly.» (Perfect в Past) глагол bark (лаять) непереходный — прямого дополнения нет, значит, повышать в подлежащее нечего. У этого отрицательного предложения пассивной формы не существует.«My clever dog had not barked loudly.» (Perfect Past'da) bark (hurmoq) o'timsiz fe'l — to'g'ri to'ldiruvchi yo'q, shuning uchun egaga ko'chiradigan narsa yo'q. Bu inkor gapning passiv shakli mavjud emas.In "My clever dog had not barked loudly." (Past Perfect) the verb bark (to bark) is intransitive — there is no direct object, so there is nothing to promote to the subject. This negative sentence has no passive form.En «My clever dog had not barked loudly.» (Pasado Perfecto) el verbo bark (ladrar) es intransitivo — no hay complemento directo, por lo que no hay nada que ascender a sujeto. Esta oración negativa no tiene forma pasiva.在“My clever dog had not barked loudly.”(过去完成时)中,动词 bark(吠叫)是不及物动词——没有直接宾语,因此没有什么可以提升为主语。这个否定句没有被动语态形式。«My clever dog had not barked loudly.» (पूर्ण भूतकाल) में, क्रिया bark (भौंकना) अकर्मक है — कोई प्रत्यक्ष कर्म नहीं है, इसलिए कर्ता में बढ़ाने के लिए कुछ नहीं है। इस नकारात्मक वाक्य का कोई कर्मवाच्य रूप नहीं है।Em «My clever dog had not barked loudly.» (Passado Perfeito) o verbo bark (latir) é intransitivo — não há objeto direto, então não há nada para promover a sujeito. Esta oração negativa não tem forma passiva.
В «Had my clever dog barked loudly?» (Perfect в Past) глагол bark (лаять) непереходный — прямого дополнения нет, значит, повышать в подлежащее нечего. У этого вопросительного предложения пассивной формы не существует.«Had my clever dog barked loudly?» (Perfect Past'da) bark (hurmoq) o'timsiz fe'l — to'g'ri to'ldiruvchi yo'q, shuning uchun egaga ko'chiradigan narsa yo'q. Bu so'roq gapning passiv shakli mavjud emas.In "Had my clever dog barked loudly?" (Past Perfect) the verb bark (to bark) is intransitive — there is no direct object, so there is nothing to promote to the subject. This interrogative sentence has no passive form.En «Had my clever dog barked loudly?» (Pasado Perfecto) el verbo bark (ladrar) es intransitivo — no hay complemento directo, por lo que no hay nada que ascender a sujeto. Esta oración interrogativa no tiene forma pasiva.在“Had my clever dog barked loudly?”(过去完成时)中,动词 bark(吠叫)是不及物动词——没有直接宾语,因此没有什么可以提升为主语。这个疑问句没有被动语态形式。«Had my clever dog barked loudly?» (पूर्ण भूतकाल) में, क्रिया bark (भौंकना) अकर्मक है — कोई प्रत्यक्ष कर्म नहीं है, इसलिए कर्ता में बढ़ाने के लिए कुछ नहीं है। इस प्रश्नवाचक वाक्य का कोई कर्मवाच्य रूप नहीं है।Em «Had my clever dog barked loudly?» (Passado Perfeito) o verbo bark (latir) é intransitivo — não há objeto direto, então não há nada para promover a sujeito. Esta oração interrogativa não tem forma passiva.
В «My clever dog will bark loudly.» (Simple в Future) глагол bark (лаять) непереходный — прямого дополнения нет, значит, повышать в подлежащее нечего. У этого утвердительного предложения пассивной формы не существует.«My clever dog will bark loudly.» (Simple Future'da) bark (hurmoq) o'timsiz fe'l — to'g'ri to'ldiruvchi yo'q, shuning uchun egaga ko'chiradigan narsa yo'q. Bu darak gapning passiv shakli mavjud emas.In "My clever dog will bark loudly." (Future Simple) the verb bark (to bark) is intransitive — there is no direct object, so there is nothing to promote to the subject. This affirmative sentence has no passive form.En «My clever dog will bark loudly.» (Futuro Simple) el verbo bark (ladrar) es intransitivo — no hay complemento directo, por lo que no hay nada que ascender a sujeto. Esta oración afirmativa no tiene forma pasiva.在“My clever dog will bark loudly.”(一般将来时)中,动词 bark(吠叫)是不及物动词——没有直接宾语,因此没有什么可以提升为主语。这个陈述句没有被动语态形式。«My clever dog will bark loudly.» (सामान्य भविष्य काल) में, क्रिया bark (भौंकना) अकर्मक है — कोई प्रत्यक्ष कर्म नहीं है, इसलिए कर्ता में बढ़ाने के लिए कुछ नहीं है। इस सकारात्मक वाक्य का कोई कर्मवाच्य रूप नहीं है।Em «My clever dog will bark loudly.» (Futuro Simples) o verbo bark (latir) é intransitivo — não há objeto direto, então não há nada para promover a sujeito. Esta oração afirmativa não tem forma passiva.
В «My clever dog will not bark loudly.» (Simple в Future) глагол bark (лаять) непереходный — прямого дополнения нет, значит, повышать в подлежащее нечего. У этого отрицательного предложения пассивной формы не существует.«My clever dog will not bark loudly.» (Simple Future'da) bark (hurmoq) o'timsiz fe'l — to'g'ri to'ldiruvchi yo'q, shuning uchun egaga ko'chiradigan narsa yo'q. Bu inkor gapning passiv shakli mavjud emas.In "My clever dog will not bark loudly." (Future Simple) the verb bark (to bark) is intransitive — there is no direct object, so there is nothing to promote to the subject. This negative sentence has no passive form.En «My clever dog will not bark loudly.» (Futuro Simple) el verbo bark (ladrar) es intransitivo — no hay complemento directo, por lo que no hay nada que ascender a sujeto. Esta oración negativa no tiene forma pasiva.在“My clever dog will not bark loudly.”(一般将来时)中,动词 bark(吠叫)是不及物动词——没有直接宾语,因此没有什么可以提升为主语。这个否定句没有被动语态形式。«My clever dog will not bark loudly.» (सामान्य भविष्य काल) में, क्रिया bark (भौंकना) अकर्मक है — कोई प्रत्यक्ष कर्म नहीं है, इसलिए कर्ता में बढ़ाने के लिए कुछ नहीं है। इस नकारात्मक वाक्य का कोई कर्मवाच्य रूप नहीं है।Em «My clever dog will not bark loudly.» (Futuro Simples) o verbo bark (latir) é intransitivo — não há objeto direto, então não há nada para promover a sujeito. Esta oração negativa não tem forma passiva.
В «Will my clever dog bark loudly?» (Simple в Future) глагол bark (лаять) непереходный — прямого дополнения нет, значит, повышать в подлежащее нечего. У этого вопросительного предложения пассивной формы не существует.«Will my clever dog bark loudly?» (Simple Future'da) bark (hurmoq) o'timsiz fe'l — to'g'ri to'ldiruvchi yo'q, shuning uchun egaga ko'chiradigan narsa yo'q. Bu so'roq gapning passiv shakli mavjud emas.In "Will my clever dog bark loudly?" (Future Simple) the verb bark (to bark) is intransitive — there is no direct object, so there is nothing to promote to the subject. This interrogative sentence has no passive form.En «Will my clever dog bark loudly?» (Futuro Simple) el verbo bark (ladrar) es intransitivo — no hay complemento directo, por lo que no hay nada que ascender a sujeto. Esta oración interrogativa no tiene forma pasiva.在“Will my clever dog bark loudly?”(一般将来时)中,动词 bark(吠叫)是不及物动词——没有直接宾语,因此没有什么可以提升为主语。这个疑问句没有被动语态形式。«Will my clever dog bark loudly?» (सामान्य भविष्य काल) में, क्रिया bark (भौंकना) अकर्मक है — कोई प्रत्यक्ष कर्म नहीं है, इसलिए कर्ता में बढ़ाने के लिए कुछ नहीं है। इस प्रश्नवाचक वाक्य का कोई कर्मवाच्य रूप नहीं है।Em «Will my clever dog bark loudly?» (Futuro Simples) o verbo bark (latir) é intransitivo — não há objeto direto, então não há nada para promover a sujeito. Esta oração interrogativa não tem forma passiva.
В «My clever dog will be barking loudly.» (Continuous в Future) глагол bark (лаять) непереходный — прямого дополнения нет, значит, повышать в подлежащее нечего. У этого утвердительного предложения пассивной формы не существует.«My clever dog will be barking loudly.» (Continuous Future'da) bark (hurmoq) o'timsiz fe'l — to'g'ri to'ldiruvchi yo'q, shuning uchun egaga ko'chiradigan narsa yo'q. Bu darak gapning passiv shakli mavjud emas.In "My clever dog will be barking loudly." (Future Continuous) the verb bark (to bark) is intransitive — there is no direct object, so there is nothing to promote to the subject. This affirmative sentence has no passive form.En «My clever dog will be barking loudly.» (Futuro Continuo) el verbo bark (ladrar) es intransitivo — no hay complemento directo, por lo que no hay nada que ascender a sujeto. Esta oración afirmativa no tiene forma pasiva.在“My clever dog will be barking loudly.”(将来进行时)中,动词 bark(吠叫)是不及物动词——没有直接宾语,因此没有什么可以提升为主语。这个陈述句没有被动语态形式。«My clever dog will be barking loudly.» (भविष्य निरंतर काल) में, क्रिया bark (भौंकना) अकर्मक है — कोई प्रत्यक्ष कर्म नहीं है, इसलिए कर्ता में बढ़ाने के लिए कुछ नहीं है। इस सकारात्मक वाक्य का कोई कर्मवाच्य रूप नहीं है।Em «My clever dog will be barking loudly.» (Futuro Contínuo) o verbo bark (latir) é intransitivo — não há objeto direto, então não há nada para promover a sujeito. Esta oração afirmativa não tem forma passiva.
В «My clever dog will not be barking loudly.» (Continuous в Future) глагол bark (лаять) непереходный — прямого дополнения нет, значит, повышать в подлежащее нечего. У этого отрицательного предложения пассивной формы не существует.«My clever dog will not be barking loudly.» (Continuous Future'da) bark (hurmoq) o'timsiz fe'l — to'g'ri to'ldiruvchi yo'q, shuning uchun egaga ko'chiradigan narsa yo'q. Bu inkor gapning passiv shakli mavjud emas.In "My clever dog will not be barking loudly." (Future Continuous) the verb bark (to bark) is intransitive — there is no direct object, so there is nothing to promote to the subject. This negative sentence has no passive form.En «My clever dog will not be barking loudly.» (Futuro Continuo) el verbo bark (ladrar) es intransitivo — no hay complemento directo, por lo que no hay nada que ascender a sujeto. Esta oración negativa no tiene forma pasiva.在“My clever dog will not be barking loudly.”(将来进行时)中,动词 bark(吠叫)是不及物动词——没有直接宾语,因此没有什么可以提升为主语。这个否定句没有被动语态形式。«My clever dog will not be barking loudly.» (भविष्य निरंतर काल) में, क्रिया bark (भौंकना) अकर्मक है — कोई प्रत्यक्ष कर्म नहीं है, इसलिए कर्ता में बढ़ाने के लिए कुछ नहीं है। इस नकारात्मक वाक्य का कोई कर्मवाच्य रूप नहीं है।Em «My clever dog will not be barking loudly.» (Futuro Contínuo) o verbo bark (latir) é intransitivo — não há objeto direto, então não há nada para promover a sujeito. Esta oração negativa não tem forma passiva.
В «Will my clever dog be barking loudly?» (Continuous в Future) глагол bark (лаять) непереходный — прямого дополнения нет, значит, повышать в подлежащее нечего. У этого вопросительного предложения пассивной формы не существует.«Will my clever dog be barking loudly?» (Continuous Future'da) bark (hurmoq) o'timsiz fe'l — to'g'ri to'ldiruvchi yo'q, shuning uchun egaga ko'chiradigan narsa yo'q. Bu so'roq gapning passiv shakli mavjud emas.In "Will my clever dog be barking loudly?" (Future Continuous) the verb bark (to bark) is intransitive — there is no direct object, so there is nothing to promote to the subject. This interrogative sentence has no passive form.En «Will my clever dog be barking loudly?» (Futuro Continuo) el verbo bark (ladrar) es intransitivo — no hay complemento directo, por lo que no hay nada que ascender a sujeto. Esta oración interrogativa no tiene forma pasiva.在“Will my clever dog be barking loudly?”(将来进行时)中,动词 bark(吠叫)是不及物动词——没有直接宾语,因此没有什么可以提升为主语。这个疑问句没有被动语态形式。«Will my clever dog be barking loudly?» (भविष्य निरंतर काल) में, क्रिया bark (भौंकना) अकर्मक है — कोई प्रत्यक्ष कर्म नहीं है, इसलिए कर्ता में बढ़ाने के लिए कुछ नहीं है। इस प्रश्नवाचक वाक्य का कोई कर्मवाच्य रूप नहीं है।Em «Will my clever dog be barking loudly?» (Futuro Contínuo) o verbo bark (latir) é intransitivo — não há objeto direto, então não há nada para promover a sujeito. Esta oração interrogativa não tem forma passiva.
В «My clever dog will have barked loudly.» (Perfect в Future) глагол bark (лаять) непереходный — прямого дополнения нет, значит, повышать в подлежащее нечего. У этого утвердительного предложения пассивной формы не существует.«My clever dog will have barked loudly.» (Perfect Future'da) bark (hurmoq) o'timsiz fe'l — to'g'ri to'ldiruvchi yo'q, shuning uchun egaga ko'chiradigan narsa yo'q. Bu darak gapning passiv shakli mavjud emas.In "My clever dog will have barked loudly." (Future Perfect) the verb bark (to bark) is intransitive — there is no direct object, so there is nothing to promote to the subject. This affirmative sentence has no passive form.En «My clever dog will have barked loudly.» (Futuro Perfecto) el verbo bark (ladrar) es intransitivo — no hay complemento directo, por lo que no hay nada que ascender a sujeto. Esta oración afirmativa no tiene forma pasiva.在“My clever dog will have barked loudly.”(将来完成时)中,动词 bark(吠叫)是不及物动词——没有直接宾语,因此没有什么可以提升为主语。这个陈述句没有被动语态形式。«My clever dog will have barked loudly.» (पूर्ण भविष्य काल) में, क्रिया bark (भौंकना) अकर्मक है — कोई प्रत्यक्ष कर्म नहीं है, इसलिए कर्ता में बढ़ाने के लिए कुछ नहीं है। इस सकारात्मक वाक्य का कोई कर्मवाच्य रूप नहीं है।Em «My clever dog will have barked loudly.» (Futuro Perfeito) o verbo bark (latir) é intransitivo — não há objeto direto, então não há nada para promover a sujeito. Esta oração afirmativa não tem forma passiva.
В «My clever dog will not have barked loudly.» (Perfect в Future) глагол bark (лаять) непереходный — прямого дополнения нет, значит, повышать в подлежащее нечего. У этого отрицательного предложения пассивной формы не существует.«My clever dog will not have barked loudly.» (Perfect Future'da) bark (hurmoq) o'timsiz fe'l — to'g'ri to'ldiruvchi yo'q, shuning uchun egaga ko'chiradigan narsa yo'q. Bu inkor gapning passiv shakli mavjud emas.In "My clever dog will not have barked loudly." (Future Perfect) the verb bark (to bark) is intransitive — there is no direct object, so there is nothing to promote to the subject. This negative sentence has no passive form.En «My clever dog will not have barked loudly.» (Futuro Perfecto) el verbo bark (ladrar) es intransitivo — no hay complemento directo, por lo que no hay nada que ascender a sujeto. Esta oración negativa no tiene forma pasiva.在“My clever dog will not have barked loudly.”(将来完成时)中,动词 bark(吠叫)是不及物动词——没有直接宾语,因此没有什么可以提升为主语。这个否定句没有被动语态形式。«My clever dog will not have barked loudly.» (पूर्ण भविष्य काल) में, क्रिया bark (भौंकना) अकर्मक है — कोई प्रत्यक्ष कर्म नहीं है, इसलिए कर्ता में बढ़ाने के लिए कुछ नहीं है। इस नकारात्मक वाक्य का कोई कर्मवाच्य रूप नहीं है।Em «My clever dog will not have barked loudly.» (Futuro Perfeito) o verbo bark (latir) é intransitivo — não há objeto direto, então não há nada para promover a sujeito. Esta oração negativa não tem forma passiva.
В «Will my clever dog have barked loudly?» (Perfect в Future) глагол bark (лаять) непереходный — прямого дополнения нет, значит, повышать в подлежащее нечего. У этого вопросительного предложения пассивной формы не существует.«Will my clever dog have barked loudly?» (Perfect Future'da) bark (hurmoq) o'timsiz fe'l — to'g'ri to'ldiruvchi yo'q, shuning uchun egaga ko'chiradigan narsa yo'q. Bu so'roq gapning passiv shakli mavjud emas.In "Will my clever dog have barked loudly?" (Future Perfect) the verb bark (to bark) is intransitive — there is no direct object, so there is nothing to promote to the subject. This interrogative sentence has no passive form.En «Will my clever dog have barked loudly?» (Futuro Perfecto) el verbo bark (ladrar) es intransitivo — no hay complemento directo, por lo que no hay nada que ascender a sujeto. Esta oración interrogativa no tiene forma pasiva.在“Will my clever dog have barked loudly?”(将来完成时)中,动词 bark(吠叫)是不及物动词——没有直接宾语,因此没有什么可以提升为主语。这个疑问句没有被动语态形式。«Will my clever dog have barked loudly?» (पूर्ण भविष्य काल) में, क्रिया bark (भौंकना) अकर्मक है — कोई प्रत्यक्ष कर्म नहीं है, इसलिए कर्ता में बढ़ाने के लिए कुछ नहीं है। इस प्रश्नवाचक वाक्य का कोई कर्मवाच्य रूप नहीं है।Em «Will my clever dog have barked loudly?» (Futuro Perfeito) o verbo bark (latir) é intransitivo — não há objeto direto, então não há nada para promover a sujeito. Esta oração interrogativa não tem forma passiva.
(Attr+Attr) + S + V + Adv(Manner)
(Attr+Attr) + S + V + NOT + Adv(Manner)
V(aux) + (Attr+Attr) + S + V + Adv(Manner)
—
Притяжательное My отвечает на «чей?» — это тоже Attribute, как и clever; оба едут вместе с вагоном Subject.Egalik olmoshi My «chey?» so'rog'iga javob beradi — bu ham clever kabi Attribute; ikkalasi ham Subject vagoni bilan birga boradi.The possessive My answers "whose?" — it is also an Attribute, just like clever; both travel together with the Subject wagon.El posesivo My responde a «¿de quién?» — también es un Attribute, igual que clever; ambos viajan junto con el vagón Subject.物主代词 My 回答“谁的?”——它也是一个 Attribute,就像 clever 一样;两者都随 Subject 车厢一起移动。संबंधवाचक My "किसका?" का उत्तर देता है — यह भी clever की तरह एक Attribute है; दोनों Subject डिब्बे के साथ यात्रा करते हैं।O possessivo My responde a «de quem?» — também é um Attribute, assim como clever; ambos viajam junto com o vagão Subject.
Отрицание образуется вспомогательным — does в Present у 3-го лица ед. числа, did в Past, will в Future — а смысловой глагол остаётся в начальной форме.Inkor yordamchi fe'l bilan yasaladi — Present'da 3-shaxs birlikda does, Past'da did, Future'da will — mustaqil fe'l esa boshlang'ich shaklda qoladi.The negative is formed with the auxiliary — does in the Present for 3rd person singular, did in the Past, will in the Future — while the main verb stays in its base form.La negación se forma con el auxiliar — does en Present para la 3ª persona singular, did en Past, will en Future — mientras que el verbo principal permanece en su forma base.否定形式由助动词构成——现在时第三人称单数用 does,过去时用 did,将来时用 will——而实义动词保持原形。निषेध सहायक क्रिया से बनता है — Present में तृतीय पुरुष एकवचन के लिए does, Past में did, Future में will — जबकि मुख्य क्रिया अपने मूल रूप में रहती है।A negação é formada com o auxiliar — does no Present para a 3ª pessoa do singular, did no Past, will no Future — enquanto o verbo principal permanece na forma base.
Вспомогательный (does/did/will) уходит вперёд, а оба Attribute остаются рядом со своим существительным.Yordamchi (does/did/will) oldinga chiqadi, ikkala Attribute esa o'z otiga yaqin qoladi.The auxiliary (does/did/will) moves to the front, while both Attributes stay next to their noun.El auxiliar (does/did/will) se adelanta, mientras que ambos Attribute permanecen junto a su sustantivo.助动词(does/did/will)移到前面,而两个 Attribute 仍留在其名词旁边。सहायक क्रिया (does/did/will) आगे चली जाती है, जबकि दोनों Attribute अपने संज्ञा के पास ही रहते हैं।O auxiliar (does/did/will) vai para a frente, enquanto ambos os Attribute permanecem junto ao seu substantivo.
В «My clever dog barks loudly.» (Simple в Present) глагол bark (лаять) непереходный — прямого дополнения нет, значит, повышать в подлежащее нечего. У этого утвердительного предложения пассивной формы не существует.«My clever dog barks loudly.» (Simple Present'da) bark (hurmoq) o'timsiz fe'l — to'g'ri to'ldiruvchi yo'q, shuning uchun egaga ko'chiradigan narsa yo'q. Bu darak gapning passiv shakli mavjud emas.In "My clever dog barks loudly." (Present Simple), the verb bark is intransitive — there is no direct object, so there is nothing to promote to subject. This affirmative sentence has no passive form.En «My clever dog barks loudly.» (Present Simple), el verbo bark (ladrar) es intransitivo — no hay complemento directo, así que no hay nada que ascender a sujeto. Esta oración afirmativa no tiene forma pasiva.在「My clever dog barks loudly.」(Present Simple)中,动词 bark(叫) 是不及物动词——没有直接宾语,因此没有可以提升为主语的成分。这个陈述句没有被动语态。«My clever dog barks loudly.» (Present Simple) में, क्रिया bark (भौंकना) अकर्मक है — कोई प्रत्यक्ष कर्म नहीं है, इसलिए कर्ता में बढ़ाने के लिए कुछ नहीं है। इस सकारात्मक वाक्य का कोई कर्मवाच्य रूप नहीं है।Em «My clever dog barks loudly.» (Present Simple), o verbo bark (latir) é intransitivo — não há objeto direto, portanto não há nada para promover a sujeito. Esta oração afirmativa não tem forma passiva.
3
She reads a book every evening.
She does not read a book every evening.
Does she read a book every evening?
She is reading a book right now.
She is not reading a book right now.
Is she reading a book right now?
She has read a book already.
She has not read a book yet.
Has she read a book yet?
She read a book every evening.
She did not read a book every evening.
Did she read a book every evening?
She was reading a book at that moment.
She was not reading a book at that moment.
Was she reading a book at that moment?
She had read a book already.
She had not read a book yet.
Had she read a book yet?
She will read a book every evening.
She will not read a book every evening.
Will she read a book every evening?
She will be reading a book at this time tomorrow.
She will not be reading a book at this time tomorrow.
Will she be reading a book at this time tomorrow?
She will have read a book by then.
She will not have read a book by then.
Will she have read a book by then?
A book is read by her every evening.
A book is not read by her every evening.
Is a book read by her every evening?
A book is being read by her right now.
A book is not being read by her right now.
Is a book being read by her right now?
A book has been read by her already.
A book has not been read by her yet.
Has a book been read by her yet?
A book was read by her every evening.
A book was not read by her every evening.
Was a book read by her every evening?
A book was being read by her at that moment.
A book was not being read by her at that moment.
Was a book being read by her at that moment?
A book had been read by her already.
A book had not been read by her yet.
Had a book been read by her yet?
A book will be read by her every evening.
A book will not be read by her every evening.
Will a book be read by her every evening?
A book will be being read by her at this time tomorrow.
A book will not be being read by her at this time tomorrow.
Will a book be being read by her at this time tomorrow?
A book will have been read by her by then.
A book will not have been read by her by then.
Will a book have been read by her by then?
S + V + (Attr) + D.O. + Adv(Time)
S + V + NOT + (Attr) + D.O. + Adv(Time)
V(aux) + S + V + (Attr) + D.O. + Adv(Time)
D.O.→S + V(be) + V3 + Adv(Agent) + Adv(Time)
D.O.→S + V(be) + NOT + V3 + Adv(Agent) + Adv(Time)
V(be) + D.O.→S + V3 + Adv(Agent) + Adv(Time)
Артикль a перед D.O. — тоже Attribute: он «какой?» = «неопределённая книга».D.O.dan oldingi a artikli ham Attribute: u «qanday?» = «noaniq kitob».The article a before the D.O. is also an Attribute: it answers "what kind?" = "an indefinite book".El artículo a antes del D.O. también es un Attribute: responde a «¿qué clase?» = «un libro indefinido».D.O. 前的冠词 a 也是一个 Attribute:它回答“什么样的?”=“一本不确定的书”。D.O. से पहले आने वाला उपपद a भी एक Attribute है: यह "किस प्रकार का?" का उत्तर देता है = "एक अनिश्चित किताब"।O artigo a antes do D.O. também é um Attribute: responde a «que tipo?» = «um livro indefinido».
Прямое дополнение остаётся на месте — меняется только сказуемое.To'g'ri to'ldiruvchi joyida qoladi — faqat kesim o'zgaradi.The direct object stays in place — only the predicate changes.El complemento directo permanece en su lugar — solo cambia el predicado.直接宾语保持原位——只有谓语发生变化。प्रत्यक्ष कर्म अपनी जगह पर रहता है — केवल विधेय बदलता है।O objeto direto permanece no lugar — apenas o predicado muda.
Классическая структура Yes/No-вопроса: вспомогательный (do/does/did/will) уходит перед подлежащим независимо от времени.Klassik Ha/Yo'q savol tuzilishi: yordamchi (do/does/did/will) zamon qanday bo'lishidan qat'i nazar egadan oldinga chiqadi.The classic Yes/No question structure: the auxiliary (do/does/did/will) moves before the subject regardless of tense.La estructura clásica de la pregunta Yes/No: el auxiliar (do/does/did/will) se coloca antes del sujeto independientemente del tiempo verbal.经典的 Yes/No 疑问句结构:无论时态如何,助动词(do/does/did/will)都会移到主语之前。क्लासिक Yes/No प्रश्न संरचना: सहायक क्रिया (do/does/did/will) काल की परवाह किए बिना कर्ता से पहले चली जाती है।A estrutura clássica da pergunta Yes/No: o auxiliar (do/does/did/will) vai antes do sujeito, independentemente do tempo verbal.
В пассиве прямое дополнение (a book) становится подлежащим; исполнитель действия (she) уходит в необязательную группу by-Agent.Passivda to'g'ri to'ldiruvchi (a book) egaga aylanadi; harakat bajaruvchisi (she) ixtiyoriy by-Agent guruhiga o'tadi.In the passive, the direct object (a book) becomes the subject; the doer of the action (she) moves into the optional by-Agent group.En la pasiva, el complemento directo (a book) se convierte en sujeto; el agente de la acción (she) pasa al grupo opcional by-Agent.在被动语态中,直接宾语(a book)变成主语;动作的施动者(she)移入可选的 by-Agent 组。कर्मवाच्य में, प्रत्यक्ष कर्म (a book) कर्ता बन जाता है; क्रिया करने वाला (she) वैकल्पिक by-Agent समूह में चला जाता है।Na passiva, o objeto direto (a book) torna-se sujeito; o agente da ação (she) passa para o grupo opcional by-Agent.
В пассиве вспомогательный — сам be (или have been в Perfect), do-support не нужен.Passivda yordamchi fe'l — bening o'zi (yoki Perfect'da have been), do-support kerak emas.In the passive, the auxiliary is be itself (or have been in the Perfect) — do-support is not needed.En la pasiva, el auxiliar es el propio be (o have been en el Perfect) — no se necesita do-support.在被动语态中,助动词就是 be 本身(或在 Perfect 中为 have been),不需要 do-support。कर्मवाच्य में, सहायक क्रिया स्वयं be होती है (या Perfect में have been), do-support की आवश्यकता नहीं होती।Na passiva, o auxiliar é o próprio be (ou have been no Perfect) — não é necessário do-support.
Инверсия здесь работает с be/have, а не с do/does/did.Bu yerda inversiya do/does/did bilan emas, be/have bilan ishlaydi.Here, inversion works with be/have, not with do/does/did.Aquí, la inversión funciona con be/have, no con do/does/did.这里的倒装使用 be/have,而不是 do/does/did。यहाँ, प्रत्यावर्तन (inversion) be/have के साथ काम करता है, न कि do/does/did के साथ।Aqui, a inversão funciona com be/have, não com do/does/did.
4
You give him a beautiful gift every year.
You do not give him a beautiful gift every year.
Do you give him a beautiful gift every year?
You are giving him a beautiful gift right now.
You are not giving him a beautiful gift right now.
Are you giving him a beautiful gift right now?
You have given him a beautiful gift already.
You have not given him a beautiful gift yet.
Have you given him a beautiful gift yet?
You gave him a beautiful gift yesterday.
You did not give him a beautiful gift yesterday.
Did you give him a beautiful gift yesterday?
You were giving him a beautiful gift at that moment.
You were not giving him a beautiful gift at that moment.
Were you giving him a beautiful gift at that moment?
You had given him a beautiful gift yesterday.
You had not given him a beautiful gift yesterday.
Had you given him a beautiful gift yesterday?
You will give him a beautiful gift tomorrow.
You will not give him a beautiful gift tomorrow.
Will you give him a beautiful gift tomorrow?
You will be giving him a beautiful gift at this time tomorrow.
You will not be giving him a beautiful gift at this time tomorrow.
Will you be giving him a beautiful gift at this time tomorrow?
You will have given him a beautiful gift tomorrow.
You will not have given him a beautiful gift tomorrow.
Will you have given him a beautiful gift tomorrow?
He is given a beautiful gift by you every year.
He is not given a beautiful gift by you every year.
Is he given a beautiful gift by you every year?
He is being given a beautiful gift by you right now.
He is not being given a beautiful gift by you right now.
Is he being given a beautiful gift by you right now?
He has been given a beautiful gift by you already.
He has not been given a beautiful gift by you yet.
Has he been given a beautiful gift by you yet?
He was given a beautiful gift by you yesterday.
He was not given a beautiful gift by you yesterday.
Was he given a beautiful gift by you yesterday?
He was being given a beautiful gift by you at that moment.
He was not being given a beautiful gift by you at that moment.
Was he being given a beautiful gift by you at that moment?
He had been given a beautiful gift by you yesterday.
He had not been given a beautiful gift by you yesterday.
Had he been given a beautiful gift by you yesterday?
He will be given a beautiful gift by you tomorrow.
He will not be given a beautiful gift by you tomorrow.
Will he be given a beautiful gift by you tomorrow?
He will be being given a beautiful gift by you at this time tomorrow.
He will not be being given a beautiful gift by you at this time tomorrow.
Will he be being given a beautiful gift by you at this time tomorrow?
He will have been given a beautiful gift by you tomorrow.
He will not have been given a beautiful gift by you tomorrow.
Will he have been given a beautiful gift by you tomorrow?
S + V + I.O. + (Attr+Attr) + D.O. + Adv(Time)
S + V + NOT + I.O. + (Attr+Attr) + D.O. + Adv(Time)
V(aux) + S + V + I.O. + (Attr+Attr) + D.O. + Adv(Time)
I.O.→S + V(be) + V3 + (Attr+Attr) + D.O.(retained) + Adv(Agent) + Adv(Time)
I.O.→S + V(be) + NOT + V3 + (Attr+Attr) + D.O.(retained) + Adv(Agent) + Adv(Time)
V(be) + I.O.→S + V3 + (Attr+Attr) + D.O.(retained) + Adv(Agent) + Adv(Time)
Ровно вагоны 3.1 и 3.2 из группы «Object» вместе — типичный ditransitive-глагол.Aynan «Object» guruhining 3.1 va 3.2 vagonlari birga — odatiy ditransitive fe'l.Exactly wagons 3.1 and 3.2 from the "Object" group together — a typical ditransitive verb.Justo los vagones 3.1 y 3.2 del grupo «Object» juntos — un verbo ditransitivo típico.恰好是“Object”组中的 3.1 和 3.2 车厢一起出现——典型的双及物动词。ठीक "Object" समूह के 3.1 और 3.2 डिब्बे साथ में — एक विशिष्ट ditransitive क्रिया।Exatamente os vagões 3.1 e 3.2 do grupo «Object» juntos — um verbo ditransitivo típico.
У смыслового глагола нет своего вспомогательного — отрицание строится через do/does/did, глагол возвращается в начальную форму.Mustaqil fe'lning o'z yordamchisi yo'q — inkor do/does/did orqali quriladi, fe'l boshlang'ich shaklga qaytadi.The main verb has no auxiliary of its own — the negative is built with do/does/did, and the verb returns to its base form.El verbo principal no tiene auxiliar propio — la negación se construye con do/does/did, y el verbo vuelve a su forma base.实义动词没有自己的助动词——否定形式通过 do/does/did 构成,动词恢复为原形。मुख्य क्रिया का अपना कोई सहायक क्रिया नहीं होता — निषेध do/does/did के माध्यम से बनता है, क्रिया अपने मूल रूप में लौट आती है।O verbo principal não tem auxiliar próprio — a negação é construída com do/does/did, e o verbo volta à forma base.
И.O. и D.O. остаются в своём порядке — инверсия трогает только сказуемое.I.O. va D.O. o'z tartibida qoladi — inversiya faqat kesimga tegadi.The I.O. and D.O. stay in their order — inversion affects only the predicate.El I.O. y el D.O. mantienen su orden — la inversión afecta solo al predicado.I.O. 和 D.O. 保持原有顺序——倒装只影响谓语。I.O. और D.O. अपने क्रम में बने रहते हैं — प्रत्यावर्तन केवल विधेय को प्रभावित करता है।O I.O. e o D.O. mantêm sua ordem — a inversão afeta apenas o predicado.
У двухобъектных глаголов (give) в пассиве обычно повышают косвенное дополнение, а прямое остаётся как «удержанное дополнение».Ikki to'ldiruvchili fe'llarda (give) passivda odatda vositali to'ldiruvchi ko'tariladi, to'g'ri to'ldiruvchi esa «ushlab qolingan to'ldiruvchi» sifatida qoladi.With two-object verbs (give), the passive usually promotes the indirect object, while the direct object remains as a "retained object".Con verbos de dos complementos (give), la pasiva normalmente asciende el complemento indirecto, mientras que el directo permanece como «complemento retenido».对于双宾语动词(give),被动语态通常提升间接宾语,而直接宾语则作为“保留宾语”留下。दो-कर्म वाली क्रियाओं (give) में, कर्मवाच्य में आमतौर पर अप्रत्यक्ष कर्म को बढ़ाया जाता है, जबकि प्रत्यक्ष कर्म "बरकरार कर्म" के रूप में रहता है।Com verbos de dois objetos (give), a passiva geralmente promove o objeto indireto, enquanto o direto permanece como «objeto retido».
Отрицание вновь строится через be/have — без do/does/did.Inkor yana be/have orqali quriladi — do/does/didsiz.Again, the negative is built with be/have — without do/does/did.De nuevo, la negación se construye con be/have — sin do/does/did.否定形式再次通过 be/have 构成——不使用 do/does/did。निषेध फिर से be/have के माध्यम से बनता है — do/does/did के बिना।Novamente, a negação é construída com be/have — sem do/does/did.
D.O. (a beautiful gift) остаётся на своём месте после глагола даже в вопросе.D.O. (a beautiful gift) savolda ham fe'ldan keyin o'z joyida qoladi.The D.O. (a beautiful gift) stays in its place after the verb even in the question.El D.O. (a beautiful gift) permanece en su lugar después del verbo incluso en la pregunta.D.O.(a beautiful gift)即使在疑问句中也保持在动词后的原位。D.O. (a beautiful gift) प्रश्न में भी क्रिया के बाद अपनी जगह पर बना रहता है।O D.O. (a beautiful gift) permanece no seu lugar após o verbo mesmo na pergunta.
5
They elect him president every term.
They do not elect him president every term.
Do they elect him president every term?
They are electing him president right now.
They are not electing him president right now.
Are they electing him president right now?
They have elected him president already.
They have not elected him president yet.
Have they elected him president yet?
They elected him president last year.
They did not elect him president last year.
Did they elect him president last year?
They were electing him president at that moment.
They were not electing him president at that moment.
Were they electing him president at that moment?
They had elected him president last year.
They had not elected him president last year.
Had they elected him president last year?
They will elect him president next term.
They will not elect him president next term.
Will they elect him president next term?
They will be electing him president at this time tomorrow.
They will not be electing him president at this time tomorrow.
Will they be electing him president at this time tomorrow?
They will have elected him president next term.
They will not have elected him president next term.
Will they have elected him president next term?
He is elected president by them every term.
He is not elected president by them every term.
Is he elected president by them every term?
He is being elected president by them right now.
He is not being elected president by them right now.
Is he being elected president by them right now?
He has been elected president by them already.
He has not been elected president by them yet.
Has he been elected president by them yet?
He was elected president by them last year.
He was not elected president by them last year.
Was he elected president by them last year?
He was being elected president by them at that moment.
He was not being elected president by them at that moment.
Was he being elected president by them at that moment?
He had been elected president by them last year.
He had not been elected president by them last year.
Had he been elected president by them last year?
He will be elected president by them next term.
He will not be elected president by them next term.
Will he be elected president by them next term?
He will be being elected president by them at this time tomorrow.
He will not be being elected president by them at this time tomorrow.
Will he be being elected president by them at this time tomorrow?
He will have been elected president by them next term.
He will not have been elected president by them next term.
Will he have been elected president by them next term?
S + V + D.O. + O.C. + Adv(Time)
S + V + NOT + D.O. + O.C. + Adv(Time)
V(aux) + S + V + D.O. + O.C. + Adv(Time)
D.O.→S + V(be) + V3 + O.C. + Adv(Agent) + Adv(Time)
D.O.→S + V(be) + NOT + V3 + O.C. + Adv(Agent) + Adv(Time)
V(be) + D.O.→S + V3 + O.C. + Adv(Agent) + Adv(Time)
O.C. переименовывает D.O.: him = president. Эта модель не сочетается с I.O.O.C. D.O.ni qayta nomlaydi: him = president. Bu model I.O. bilan birga kelmaydi.The O.C. renames the D.O.: him = president. This pattern does not combine with an I.O.El O.C. renombra al D.O.: him = president. Este patrón no se combina con un I.O.O.C. 对 D.O. 进行重新命名:him = president。这种结构不与 I.O. 搭配使用。O.C., D.O. का पुनर्नामकरण करता है: him = president। यह पैटर्न I.O. के साथ नहीं आता।O O.C. renomeia o D.O.: him = president. Este padrão não se combina com um I.O.
Ни артикля, ни притяжательного перед president нет.presidentdan oldin na artikl, na egalik olmoshi bor.There is neither an article nor a possessive before president.No hay ni artículo ni posesivo antes de president.president 前既没有冠词也没有物主代词。president से पहले न तो कोई उपपद है और न ही कोई संबंधवाचक।Não há artigo nem possessivo antes de president.
D.O. и O.C. — единственная пара, которая всегда идёт строго вместе и в этом порядке.D.O. va O.C. — doim qat'iy shu tartibda birga keladigan yagona juftlik.The D.O. and O.C. are the only pair that always goes strictly together and in this order.El D.O. y el O.C. son el único par que siempre va estrictamente junto y en este orden.D.O. 和 O.C. 是唯一始终严格一起出现并保持这一顺序的一对。D.O. और O.C. वह एकमात्र जोड़ी है जो हमेशा सख्ती से एक साथ और इसी क्रम में आती है।O D.O. e o O.C. são o único par que sempre vai estritamente junto e nesta ordem.
O.C. продолжает переименовывать бывший D.O., теперь ставший подлежащим — связь D.O.–O.C. не рвётся при переходе в пассив.O.C. hozir egaga aylangan sobiq D.O.ni qayta nomlashda davom etadi — passivga o'tganda D.O.–O.C. bog'lanishi uzilmaydi.The O.C. continues to rename the former D.O., now turned subject — the D.O.–O.C. link is not broken when switching to the passive.El O.C. sigue renombrando al antiguo D.O., ahora convertido en sujeto — el vínculo D.O.–O.C. no se rompe al pasar a la pasiva.O.C. 继续对现已变为主语的原 D.O. 进行重新命名——转为被动语态时,D.O.–O.C. 的联系不会断开。O.C. पूर्व D.O. का पुनर्नामकरण करना जारी रखता है, जो अब कर्ता बन चुका है — कर्मवाच्य में बदलने पर D.O.–O.C. संबंध नहीं टूटता।O O.C. continua a renomear o antigo D.O., agora tornado sujeito — o vínculo D.O.–O.C. não se quebra ao passar para a passiva.
И снова: никакого do/does/did — только be/have + not.Va yana: do/does/did yo'q — faqat be/have + not.Again: no do/does/did — only be/have + not.De nuevo: nada de do/does/did — solo be/have + not.再一次:没有 do/does/did——只有 be/have + not。फिर से: कोई do/does/did नहीं — केवल be/have + not।E novamente: nada de do/does/did — apenas be/have + not.
O.C. (president) остаётся сразу после глагола и в вопросе.O.C. (president) savolda ham fe'ldan keyin turadi.The O.C. (president) stays right after the verb in the question too.El O.C. (president) permanece justo después del verbo también en la pregunta.O.C.(president)在疑问句中也仍紧跟在动词之后。O.C. (president) प्रश्न में भी क्रिया के ठीक बाद रहता है।O O.C. (president) permanece logo após o verbo também na pergunta.
6
Honestly, I forget my keys at home.
Honestly, I do not forget my keys at home.
Honestly, do I forget my keys at home?
Honestly, I am forgetting my keys at home.
Honestly, I am not forgetting my keys at home.
Honestly, am I forgetting my keys at home?
Honestly, I have forgotten my keys at home.
Honestly, I have not forgotten my keys at home.
Honestly, have I forgotten my keys at home?
Honestly, I forgot my keys at home.
Honestly, I did not forget my keys at home.
Honestly, did I forget my keys at home?
Honestly, I was forgetting my keys at home.
Honestly, I was not forgetting my keys at home.
Honestly, was I forgetting my keys at home?
Honestly, I had forgotten my keys at home.
Honestly, I had not forgotten my keys at home.
Honestly, had I forgotten my keys at home?
Honestly, I will forget my keys at home.
Honestly, I will not forget my keys at home.
Honestly, will I forget my keys at home?
Honestly, I will be forgetting my keys at home.
Honestly, I will not be forgetting my keys at home.
Honestly, will I be forgetting my keys at home?
Honestly, I will have forgotten my keys at home.
Honestly, I will not have forgotten my keys at home.
Honestly, will I have forgotten my keys at home?
Honestly, my keys are forgotten at home by me.
Honestly, my keys are not forgotten at home by me.
Honestly, are my keys forgotten at home by me?
Honestly, my keys are being forgotten at home by me.
Honestly, my keys are not being forgotten at home by me.
Honestly, are my keys being forgotten at home by me?
Honestly, my keys have been forgotten at home by me.
Honestly, my keys have not been forgotten at home by me.
Honestly, have my keys been forgotten at home by me?
Honestly, my keys were forgotten at home by me.
Honestly, my keys were not forgotten at home by me.
Honestly, were my keys forgotten at home by me?
Honestly, my keys were being forgotten at home by me.
Honestly, my keys were not being forgotten at home by me.
Honestly, were my keys being forgotten at home by me?
Honestly, my keys had been forgotten at home by me.
Honestly, my keys had not been forgotten at home by me.
Honestly, had my keys been forgotten at home by me?
Honestly, my keys will be forgotten at home by me.
Honestly, my keys will not be forgotten at home by me.
Honestly, will my keys be forgotten at home by me?
Honestly, my keys will be being forgotten at home by me.
Honestly, my keys will not be being forgotten at home by me.
Honestly, will my keys be being forgotten at home by me?
Honestly, my keys will have been forgotten at home by me.
Honestly, my keys will not have been forgotten at home by me.
Honestly, will my keys have been forgotten at home by me?
Indep + S + V + (Attr) + D.O. + Adv(Place)
Indep + S + V + NOT + (Attr) + D.O. + Adv(Place)
Indep + V(aux) + S + V + (Attr) + D.O. + Adv(Place)
Indep + Attr + D.O.→S + V(be) + V3 + Adv(Place) + Adv(Agent)
Indep + Attr + D.O.→S + V(be) + NOT + V3 + Adv(Place) + Adv(Agent)
Indep + V(be) + Attr + D.O.→S + V3 + Adv(Place) + Adv(Agent)
Independent Element (Honestly) остаётся первым словом при любом времени и виде.Independent Element (Honestly) har qanday zamon va aspektda birinchi so'z bo'lib qoladi.The Independent Element (Honestly) stays the first word regardless of tense and aspect.El Independent Element (Honestly) permanece como la primera palabra sin importar el tiempo y el aspecto.Independent Element(Honestly)无论时态和体如何都保持在首位。Independent Element (Honestly) किसी भी काल और पक्ष (aspect) में पहला शब्द बना रहता है।O Independent Element (Honestly) permanece a primeira palavra independentemente do tempo e do aspecto.
Attribute (my) переехал вместе со своим существительным.Attribute (my) o'zi izohlayotgan ot bilan birga ko'chib o'tdi.The Attribute (my) moved together with its noun.El Attribute (my) se movió junto con su sustantivo.Attribute(my)随其名词一起移动了。Attribute (my) अपने संज्ञा के साथ स्थानांतरित हो गया।O Attribute (my) mudou junto com o seu substantivo.
Инверсия «перепрыгивает» через Indep, как и в активном залоге.Inversiya faol nisbatdagidek Indep orqali «sakrab o'tadi».Inversion "jumps over" the Indep, just as it does in the active voice.La inversión «salta por encima» del Indep, igual que en la voz activa.倒装“跳过” Indep,就像在主动语态中一样。प्रत्यावर्तन Indep के ऊपर से "छलांग लगाता है", जैसा कि सक्रिय वाच्य में होता है।A inversão «salta por cima» do Indep, assim como na voz ativa.
Independent Element (Honestly) остаётся первым словом и в пассиве — voice вообще не касается независимых элементов.Independent Element (Honestly) passivda ham birinchi so'z bo'lib qoladi.The Independent Element (Honestly) stays the first word in the passive too — voice does not affect independent elements at all.El Independent Element (Honestly) permanece como la primera palabra también en la pasiva — la voz no afecta en absoluto a los elementos independientes.Independent Element(Honestly)在被动语态中也仍是首位——语态根本不影响独立成分。Independent Element (Honestly) कर्मवाच्य में भी पहला शब्द बना रहता है — voice स्वतंत्र तत्वों को बिल्कुल प्रभावित नहीं करता।O Independent Element (Honestly) permanece a primeira palavra também na passiva — a voice não afeta em nada os elementos independentes.
Attribute (my) переехал вместе со своим существительным, которое теперь стало подлежащим.Attribute (my) endi egaga aylangan o'zi izohlayotgan ot bilan birga ko'chib o'tdi.The Attribute (my) moved together with its noun, which has now become the subject.El Attribute (my) se movió junto con su sustantivo, que ahora se ha convertido en sujeto.Attribute(my)随其名词一起移动,该名词现在已成为主语。Attribute (my) अपने संज्ञा के साथ स्थानांतरित हो गया, जो अब कर्ता बन चुकी है।O Attribute (my) mudou junto com o seu substantivo, que agora se tornou o sujeito.
Инверсия «перепрыгивает» через Indep, как и в активном залоге.Inversiya faol nisbatdagidek Indep orqali «sakrab o'tadi».Inversion "jumps over" the Indep, just as it does in the active voice.La inversión «salta por encima» del Indep, igual que en la voz activa.倒装“跳过” Indep,就像在主动语态中一样。प्रत्यावर्तन Indep के ऊपर से "छलांग लगाता है", जैसा कि सक्रिय वाच्य में होता है।A inversão «salta por cima» do Indep, assim como na voz ativa.
7
John, my best friend, calls me from London every evening.
John, my best friend, does not call me from London every evening.
Does John, my best friend, call me from London every evening?
John, my best friend, is calling me from London right now.
John, my best friend, is not calling me from London right now.
Is John, my best friend, calling me from London right now?
John, my best friend, has called me from London already.
John, my best friend, has not called me from London yet.
Has John, my best friend, called me from London yet?
John, my best friend, called me from London yesterday evening.
John, my best friend, did not call me from London yesterday evening.
Did John, my best friend, call me from London yesterday evening?
John, my best friend, was calling me from London at that moment.
John, my best friend, was not calling me from London at that moment.
Was John, my best friend, calling me from London at that moment?
John, my best friend, had called me from London yesterday evening.
John, my best friend, had not called me from London yesterday evening.
Had John, my best friend, called me from London yesterday evening?
John, my best friend, will call me from London tomorrow evening.
John, my best friend, will not call me from London tomorrow evening.
Will John, my best friend, call me from London tomorrow evening?
John, my best friend, will be calling me from London at this time tomorrow.
John, my best friend, will not be calling me from London at this time tomorrow.
Will John, my best friend, be calling me from London at this time tomorrow?
John, my best friend, will have called me from London tomorrow evening.
John, my best friend, will not have called me from London tomorrow evening.
Will John, my best friend, have called me from London tomorrow evening?
I am called from London by John, my best friend, every evening.
I am not called from London by John, my best friend, every evening.
Am I called from London by John, my best friend, every evening?
I am being called from London by John, my best friend, right now.
I am not being called from London by John, my best friend, right now.
Am I being called from London by John, my best friend, right now?
I have been called from London by John, my best friend, already.
I have not been called from London by John, my best friend, yet.
Have I been called from London by John, my best friend, yet?
I was called from London by John, my best friend, yesterday evening.
I was not called from London by John, my best friend, yesterday evening.
Was I called from London by John, my best friend, yesterday evening?
I was being called from London by John, my best friend, at that moment.
I was not being called from London by John, my best friend, at that moment.
Was I being called from London by John, my best friend, at that moment?
I had been called from London by John, my best friend, yesterday evening.
I had not been called from London by John, my best friend, yesterday evening.
Had I been called from London by John, my best friend, yesterday evening?
I will be called from London by John, my best friend, tomorrow evening.
I will not be called from London by John, my best friend, tomorrow evening.
Will I be called from London by John, my best friend, tomorrow evening?
I will be being called from London by John, my best friend, at this time tomorrow.
I will not be being called from London by John, my best friend, at this time tomorrow.
Will I be being called from London by John, my best friend, at this time tomorrow?
I will have been called from London by John, my best friend, tomorrow evening.
I will not have been called from London by John, my best friend, tomorrow evening.
Will I have been called from London by John, my best friend, tomorrow evening?
S + Appos + V + D.O. + Adv(Place) + Adv(Time)
S + Appos + V + NOT + D.O. + Adv(Place) + Adv(Time)
V(aux) + S + Appos + V + D.O. + Adv(Place) + Adv(Time)
D.O.→S + V(be) + V3 + Adv(Place) + Adv(Agent)+Appos + Adv(Time)
D.O.→S + V(be) + NOT + V3 + Adv(Place) + Adv(Agent)+Appos + Adv(Time)
V(be) + D.O.→S + V3 + Adv(Place) + Adv(Agent)+Appos + Adv(Time)
Apposition сразу после Subject; два обстоятельства едут в порядке place → time (SVOMPT).Apposition Subject'dan darhol keyin; ikkita hol place → time tartibida (SVOMPT).The Apposition comes right after the Subject; the two adverbial modifiers follow the order place → time (SVOMPT).El Apposition va justo después del Subject; los dos adverbiales siguen el orden place → time (SVOMPT).Apposition 紧跟在 Subject 之后;两个状语按 place → time 的顺序排列(SVOMPT)。Apposition, Subject के ठीक बाद आता है; दोनों क्रियाविशेषण उपवाक्य (adverbial modifiers) place → time के क्रम में आते हैं (SVOMPT)।A Apposition vem logo após o Subject; os dois advérbios seguem a ordem place → time (SVOMPT).
Apposition остаётся приклеенной к Subject даже когда сказуемое меняется.Kesim o'zgarganda ham Apposition Subject'ga yopishgan holda qoladi.The Apposition stays glued to the Subject even when the predicate changes.El Apposition permanece pegado al Subject incluso cuando el predicado cambia.即使谓语发生变化,Apposition 仍紧贴在 Subject 上。विधेय बदलने पर भी Apposition, Subject से चिपका रहता है।A Apposition permanece colada ao Subject mesmo quando o predicado muda.
Инверсия «перепрыгивает» через Apposition.Inversiya Apposition orqali «sakrab o'tadi».Inversion "jumps over" the Apposition.La inversión «salta por encima» del Apposition.倒装“跳过” Apposition。प्रत्यावर्तन Apposition के ऊपर से "छलांग लगाता है"।A inversão «salta por cima» da Apposition.
Apposition (my best friend) «путешествует» вместе со словом, которое поясняет (John) — даже когда John переезжает в группу by-Agent.Apposition (my best friend) izohlayotgan so'zi (John) bilan birga «ko'chib o'tadi».The Apposition (my best friend) "travels" together with the word it explains (John) — even when John moves into the by-Agent group.El Apposition (my best friend) «viaja» junto con la palabra que explica (John) — incluso cuando John pasa al grupo by-Agent.Apposition(my best friend)与它所说明的词(John)一起“移动”——即使 John 移入 by-Agent 组也是如此。Apposition (my best friend) उस शब्द के साथ "यात्रा" करता है जिसे वह स्पष्ट करता है (John) — यहाँ तक कि जब John, by-Agent समूह में चला जाता है तब भी।A Apposition (my best friend) «viaja» junto com a palavra que explica (John) — mesmo quando John passa para o grupo by-Agent.
Единственный вспомогательный здесь — be/have; not примыкает прямо к нему.Bu yerdagi yagona yordamchi — be/have; not unga to'g'ridan-to'g'ri ulanadi.The only auxiliary here is be/have; not attaches directly to it.El único auxiliar aquí es be/have; not se une directamente a él.这里唯一的助动词是 be/have;not 直接附加在它后面。यहाँ केवल एक सहायक क्रिया (auxiliary) है — be/have; not सीधे इससे जुड़ता है।O único auxiliar aqui é be/have; not se anexa diretamente a ele.
1-е лицо (I am) в вопросе даёт Am I...?1-shaxs (I am) savolda Am I...? beradi.1st person (I am) in a question gives Am I...?La 1.ª persona (I am) en una pregunta da Am I...?第一人称(I am)在疑问句中变为 Am I...?प्रश्न में प्रथम पुरुष (I am) से Am I...? बनता है।A 1ª pessoa (I am) numa pergunta dá Am I...?
8
Oh, the little cat sleeps quietly under the table.
Oh, the little cat does not sleep quietly under the table.
Oh, does the little cat sleep quietly under the table?
Oh, the little cat is sleeping quietly under the table.
Oh, the little cat is not sleeping quietly under the table.
Oh, is the little cat sleeping quietly under the table?
Oh, the little cat has slept quietly under the table.
Oh, the little cat has not slept quietly under the table.
Oh, has the little cat slept quietly under the table?
Oh, the little cat slept quietly under the table.
Oh, the little cat did not sleep quietly under the table.
Oh, did the little cat sleep quietly under the table?
Oh, the little cat was sleeping quietly under the table.
Oh, the little cat was not sleeping quietly under the table.
Oh, was the little cat sleeping quietly under the table?
Oh, the little cat had slept quietly under the table.
Oh, the little cat had not slept quietly under the table.
Oh, had the little cat slept quietly under the table?
Oh, the little cat will sleep quietly under the table.
Oh, the little cat will not sleep quietly under the table.
Oh, will the little cat sleep quietly under the table?
Oh, the little cat will be sleeping quietly under the table.
Oh, the little cat will not be sleeping quietly under the table.
Oh, will the little cat be sleeping quietly under the table?
Oh, the little cat will have slept quietly under the table.
Oh, the little cat will not have slept quietly under the table.
Oh, will the little cat have slept quietly under the table?
В «Oh, the little cat sleeps quietly under the table.» (Simple в Present) глагол sleep (спать) непереходный — прямого дополнения нет, значит, повышать в подлежащее нечего. У этого утвердительного предложения пассивной формы не существует.«Oh, the little cat sleeps quietly under the table.» (Simple Present'da) sleep (uxlamoq) o'timsiz fe'l — to'g'ri to'ldiruvchi yo'q, shuning uchun egaga ko'chiradigan narsa yo'q. Bu darak gapning passiv shakli mavjud emas.In "Oh, the little cat sleeps quietly under the table." (Simple Present), the verb sleep is intransitive — there is no direct object, so there is nothing to promote to subject. This affirmative sentence has no passive form.En «Oh, the little cat sleeps quietly under the table.» (Simple Present), el verbo sleep (dormir) es intransitivo — no hay complemento directo, así que no hay nada que elevar a sujeto. Esta oración afirmativa no tiene forma pasiva.在“Oh, the little cat sleeps quietly under the table.”(Simple Present)中,动词 sleep(睡觉) 是不及物动词——没有直接宾语,因此没有可以提升为主语的成分。这个陈述句没有被动语态形式。"Oh, the little cat sleeps quietly under the table." (Simple Present) में क्रिया sleep (सोना) अकर्मक है — कोई प्रत्यक्ष कर्म (direct object) नहीं है, इसलिए कर्ता (subject) बनाने के लिए कुछ नहीं है। इस सकारात्मक वाक्य का कोई कर्मवाच्य (passive) रूप नहीं है।Em «Oh, the little cat sleeps quietly under the table.» (Simple Present), o verbo sleep (dormir) é intransitivo — não há objeto direto, então não há nada para promover a sujeito. Esta oração afirmativa não tem forma passiva.
В «Oh, the little cat does not sleep quietly under the table.» (Simple в Present) глагол sleep (спать) непереходный — прямого дополнения нет, значит, повышать в подлежащее нечего. У этого отрицательного предложения пассивной формы не существует.«Oh, the little cat does not sleep quietly under the table.» (Simple Present'da) sleep (uxlamoq) o'timsiz fe'l — to'g'ri to'ldiruvchi yo'q, shuning uchun egaga ko'chiradigan narsa yo'q. Bu inkor gapning passiv shakli mavjud emas.In "Oh, the little cat does not sleep quietly under the table." (Simple Present), the verb sleep is intransitive — there is no direct object, so there is nothing to promote to subject. This negative sentence has no passive form.En «Oh, the little cat does not sleep quietly under the table.» (Simple Present), el verbo sleep (dormir) es intransitivo — no hay complemento directo, así que no hay nada que elevar a sujeto. Esta oración negativa no tiene forma pasiva.在“Oh, the little cat does not sleep quietly under the table.”(Simple Present)中,动词 sleep(睡觉) 是不及物动词——没有直接宾语,因此没有可以提升为主语的成分。这个否定句没有被动语态形式。"Oh, the little cat does not sleep quietly under the table." (Simple Present) में क्रिया sleep (सोना) अकर्मक है — कोई प्रत्यक्ष कर्म (direct object) नहीं है, इसलिए कर्ता (subject) बनाने के लिए कुछ नहीं है। इस नकारात्मक वाक्य का कोई कर्मवाच्य (passive) रूप नहीं है।Em «Oh, the little cat does not sleep quietly under the table.» (Simple Present), o verbo sleep (dormir) é intransitivo — não há objeto direto, então não há nada para promover a sujeito. Esta oração negativa não tem forma passiva.
В «Oh, does the little cat sleep quietly under the table?» (Simple в Present) глагол sleep (спать) непереходный — прямого дополнения нет, значит, повышать в подлежащее нечего. У этого вопросительного предложения пассивной формы не существует.«Oh, does the little cat sleep quietly under the table?» (Simple Present'da) sleep (uxlamoq) o'timsiz fe'l — to'g'ri to'ldiruvchi yo'q, shuning uchun egaga ko'chiradigan narsa yo'q. Bu so'roq gapning passiv shakli mavjud emas.In "Oh, does the little cat sleep quietly under the table?" (Simple Present), the verb sleep is intransitive — there is no direct object, so there is nothing to promote to subject. This interrogative sentence has no passive form.En «Oh, does the little cat sleep quietly under the table?» (Simple Present), el verbo sleep (dormir) es intransitivo — no hay complemento directo, así que no hay nada que elevar a sujeto. Esta oración interrogativa no tiene forma pasiva.在“Oh, does the little cat sleep quietly under the table?”(Simple Present)中,动词 sleep(睡觉) 是不及物动词——没有直接宾语,因此没有可以提升为主语的成分。这个疑问句没有被动语态形式。"Oh, does the little cat sleep quietly under the table?" (Simple Present) में क्रिया sleep (सोना) अकर्मक है — कोई प्रत्यक्ष कर्म (direct object) नहीं है, इसलिए कर्ता (subject) बनाने के लिए कुछ नहीं है। इस प्रश्नवाचक वाक्य का कोई कर्मवाच्य (passive) रूप नहीं है।Em «Oh, does the little cat sleep quietly under the table?» (Simple Present), o verbo sleep (dormir) é intransitivo — não há objeto direto, então não há nada para promover a sujeito. Esta oração interrogativa não tem forma passiva.
В «Oh, the little cat is sleeping quietly under the table.» (Continuous в Present) глагол sleep (спать) непереходный — прямого дополнения нет, значит, повышать в подлежащее нечего. У этого утвердительного предложения пассивной формы не существует.«Oh, the little cat is sleeping quietly under the table.» (Continuous Present'da) sleep (uxlamoq) o'timsiz fe'l — to'g'ri to'ldiruvchi yo'q, shuning uchun egaga ko'chiradigan narsa yo'q. Bu darak gapning passiv shakli mavjud emas.In "Oh, the little cat is sleeping quietly under the table." (Continuous Present), the verb sleep is intransitive — there is no direct object, so there is nothing to promote to subject. This affirmative sentence has no passive form.En «Oh, the little cat is sleeping quietly under the table.» (Continuous Present), el verbo sleep (dormir) es intransitivo — no hay complemento directo, así que no hay nada que elevar a sujeto. Esta oración afirmativa no tiene forma pasiva.在“Oh, the little cat is sleeping quietly under the table.”(Continuous Present)中,动词 sleep(睡觉) 是不及物动词——没有直接宾语,因此没有可以提升为主语的成分。这个陈述句没有被动语态形式。"Oh, the little cat is sleeping quietly under the table." (Continuous Present) में क्रिया sleep (सोना) अकर्मक है — कोई प्रत्यक्ष कर्म (direct object) नहीं है, इसलिए कर्ता (subject) बनाने के लिए कुछ नहीं है। इस सकारात्मक वाक्य का कोई कर्मवाच्य (passive) रूप नहीं है।Em «Oh, the little cat is sleeping quietly under the table.» (Continuous Present), o verbo sleep (dormir) é intransitivo — não há objeto direto, então não há nada para promover a sujeito. Esta oração afirmativa não tem forma passiva.
В «Oh, the little cat is not sleeping quietly under the table.» (Continuous в Present) глагол sleep (спать) непереходный — прямого дополнения нет, значит, повышать в подлежащее нечего. У этого отрицательного предложения пассивной формы не существует.«Oh, the little cat is not sleeping quietly under the table.» (Continuous Present'da) sleep (uxlamoq) o'timsiz fe'l — to'g'ri to'ldiruvchi yo'q, shuning uchun egaga ko'chiradigan narsa yo'q. Bu inkor gapning passiv shakli mavjud emas.In "Oh, the little cat is not sleeping quietly under the table." (Continuous Present), the verb sleep is intransitive — there is no direct object, so there is nothing to promote to subject. This negative sentence has no passive form.En «Oh, the little cat is not sleeping quietly under the table.» (Continuous Present), el verbo sleep (dormir) es intransitivo — no hay complemento directo, así que no hay nada que elevar a sujeto. Esta oración negativa no tiene forma pasiva.在“Oh, the little cat is not sleeping quietly under the table.”(Continuous Present)中,动词 sleep(睡觉) 是不及物动词——没有直接宾语,因此没有可以提升为主语的成分。这个否定句没有被动语态形式。"Oh, the little cat is not sleeping quietly under the table." (Continuous Present) में क्रिया sleep (सोना) अकर्मक है — कोई प्रत्यक्ष कर्म (direct object) नहीं है, इसलिए कर्ता (subject) बनाने के लिए कुछ नहीं है। इस नकारात्मक वाक्य का कोई कर्मवाच्य (passive) रूप नहीं है।Em «Oh, the little cat is not sleeping quietly under the table.» (Continuous Present), o verbo sleep (dormir) é intransitivo — não há objeto direto, então não há nada para promover a sujeito. Esta oração negativa não tem forma passiva.
В «Oh, is the little cat sleeping quietly under the table?» (Continuous в Present) глагол sleep (спать) непереходный — прямого дополнения нет, значит, повышать в подлежащее нечего. У этого вопросительного предложения пассивной формы не существует.«Oh, is the little cat sleeping quietly under the table?» (Continuous Present'da) sleep (uxlamoq) o'timsiz fe'l — to'g'ri to'ldiruvchi yo'q, shuning uchun egaga ko'chiradigan narsa yo'q. Bu so'roq gapning passiv shakli mavjud emas.In "Oh, is the little cat sleeping quietly under the table?" (Continuous Present), the verb sleep is intransitive — there is no direct object, so there is nothing to promote to subject. This interrogative sentence has no passive form.En «Oh, is the little cat sleeping quietly under the table?» (Continuous Present), el verbo sleep (dormir) es intransitivo — no hay complemento directo, así que no hay nada que elevar a sujeto. Esta oración interrogativa no tiene forma pasiva.在“Oh, is the little cat sleeping quietly under the table?”(Continuous Present)中,动词 sleep(睡觉) 是不及物动词——没有直接宾语,因此没有可以提升为主语的成分。这个疑问句没有被动语态形式。"Oh, is the little cat sleeping quietly under the table?" (Continuous Present) में क्रिया sleep (सोना) अकर्मक है — कोई प्रत्यक्ष कर्म (direct object) नहीं है, इसलिए कर्ता (subject) बनाने के लिए कुछ नहीं है। इस प्रश्नवाचक वाक्य का कोई कर्मवाच्य (passive) रूप नहीं है।Em «Oh, is the little cat sleeping quietly under the table?» (Continuous Present), o verbo sleep (dormir) é intransitivo — não há objeto direto, então não há nada para promover a sujeito. Esta oração interrogativa não tem forma passiva.
В «Oh, the little cat has slept quietly under the table.» (Perfect в Present) глагол sleep (спать) непереходный — прямого дополнения нет, значит, повышать в подлежащее нечего. У этого утвердительного предложения пассивной формы не существует.«Oh, the little cat has slept quietly under the table.» (Perfect Present'da) sleep (uxlamoq) o'timsiz fe'l — to'g'ri to'ldiruvchi yo'q, shuning uchun egaga ko'chiradigan narsa yo'q. Bu darak gapning passiv shakli mavjud emas.In "Oh, the little cat has slept quietly under the table." (Perfect Present), the verb sleep is intransitive — there is no direct object, so there is nothing to promote to subject. This affirmative sentence has no passive form.En «Oh, the little cat has slept quietly under the table.» (Perfect Present), el verbo sleep (dormir) es intransitivo — no hay complemento directo, así que no hay nada que elevar a sujeto. Esta oración afirmativa no tiene forma pasiva.在“Oh, the little cat has slept quietly under the table.”(Perfect Present)中,动词 sleep(睡觉) 是不及物动词——没有直接宾语,因此没有可以提升为主语的成分。这个陈述句没有被动语态形式。"Oh, the little cat has slept quietly under the table." (Perfect Present) में क्रिया sleep (सोना) अकर्मक है — कोई प्रत्यक्ष कर्म (direct object) नहीं है, इसलिए कर्ता (subject) बनाने के लिए कुछ नहीं है। इस सकारात्मक वाक्य का कोई कर्मवाच्य (passive) रूप नहीं है।Em «Oh, the little cat has slept quietly under the table.» (Perfect Present), o verbo sleep (dormir) é intransitivo — não há objeto direto, então não há nada para promover a sujeito. Esta oração afirmativa não tem forma passiva.
В «Oh, the little cat has not slept quietly under the table.» (Perfect в Present) глагол sleep (спать) непереходный — прямого дополнения нет, значит, повышать в подлежащее нечего. У этого отрицательного предложения пассивной формы не существует.«Oh, the little cat has not slept quietly under the table.» (Perfect Present'da) sleep (uxlamoq) o'timsiz fe'l — to'g'ri to'ldiruvchi yo'q, shuning uchun egaga ko'chiradigan narsa yo'q. Bu inkor gapning passiv shakli mavjud emas.In "Oh, the little cat has not slept quietly under the table." (Perfect Present), the verb sleep is intransitive — there is no direct object, so there is nothing to promote to subject. This negative sentence has no passive form.En «Oh, the little cat has not slept quietly under the table.» (Perfect Present), el verbo sleep (dormir) es intransitivo — no hay complemento directo, así que no hay nada que elevar a sujeto. Esta oración negativa no tiene forma pasiva.在“Oh, the little cat has not slept quietly under the table.”(Perfect Present)中,动词 sleep(睡觉) 是不及物动词——没有直接宾语,因此没有可以提升为主语的成分。这个否定句没有被动语态形式。"Oh, the little cat has not slept quietly under the table." (Perfect Present) में क्रिया sleep (सोना) अकर्मक है — कोई प्रत्यक्ष कर्म (direct object) नहीं है, इसलिए कर्ता (subject) बनाने के लिए कुछ नहीं है। इस नकारात्मक वाक्य का कोई कर्मवाच्य (passive) रूप नहीं है।Em «Oh, the little cat has not slept quietly under the table.» (Perfect Present), o verbo sleep (dormir) é intransitivo — não há objeto direto, então não há nada para promover a sujeito. Esta oração negativa não tem forma passiva.
В «Oh, has the little cat slept quietly under the table?» (Perfect в Present) глагол sleep (спать) непереходный — прямого дополнения нет, значит, повышать в подлежащее нечего. У этого вопросительного предложения пассивной формы не существует.«Oh, has the little cat slept quietly under the table?» (Perfect Present'da) sleep (uxlamoq) o'timsiz fe'l — to'g'ri to'ldiruvchi yo'q, shuning uchun egaga ko'chiradigan narsa yo'q. Bu so'roq gapning passiv shakli mavjud emas.In "Oh, has the little cat slept quietly under the table?" (Perfect Present), the verb sleep is intransitive — there is no direct object, so there is nothing to promote to subject. This interrogative sentence has no passive form.En «Oh, has the little cat slept quietly under the table?» (Perfect Present), el verbo sleep (dormir) es intransitivo — no hay complemento directo, así que no hay nada que elevar a sujeto. Esta oración interrogativa no tiene forma pasiva.在“Oh, has the little cat slept quietly under the table?”(Perfect Present)中,动词 sleep(睡觉) 是不及物动词——没有直接宾语,因此没有可以提升为主语的成分。这个疑问句没有被动语态形式。"Oh, has the little cat slept quietly under the table?" (Perfect Present) में क्रिया sleep (सोना) अकर्मक है — कोई प्रत्यक्ष कर्म (direct object) नहीं है, इसलिए कर्ता (subject) बनाने के लिए कुछ नहीं है। इस प्रश्नवाचक वाक्य का कोई कर्मवाच्य (passive) रूप नहीं है।Em «Oh, has the little cat slept quietly under the table?» (Perfect Present), o verbo sleep (dormir) é intransitivo — não há objeto direto, então não há nada para promover a sujeito. Esta oração interrogativa não tem forma passiva.
В «Oh, the little cat slept quietly under the table.» (Simple в Past) глагол sleep (спать) непереходный — прямого дополнения нет, значит, повышать в подлежащее нечего. У этого утвердительного предложения пассивной формы не существует.«Oh, the little cat slept quietly under the table.» (Simple Past'da) sleep (uxlamoq) o'timsiz fe'l — to'g'ri to'ldiruvchi yo'q, shuning uchun egaga ko'chiradigan narsa yo'q. Bu darak gapning passiv shakli mavjud emas.In "Oh, the little cat slept quietly under the table." (Simple Past), the verb sleep is intransitive — there is no direct object, so there is nothing to promote to subject. This affirmative sentence has no passive form.En «Oh, the little cat slept quietly under the table.» (Simple Past), el verbo sleep (dormir) es intransitivo — no hay complemento directo, así que no hay nada que elevar a sujeto. Esta oración afirmativa no tiene forma pasiva.在“Oh, the little cat slept quietly under the table.”(Simple Past)中,动词 sleep(睡觉) 是不及物动词——没有直接宾语,因此没有可以提升为主语的成分。这个陈述句没有被动语态形式。"Oh, the little cat slept quietly under the table." (Simple Past) में क्रिया sleep (सोना) अकर्मक है — कोई प्रत्यक्ष कर्म (direct object) नहीं है, इसलिए कर्ता (subject) बनाने के लिए कुछ नहीं है। इस सकारात्मक वाक्य का कोई कर्मवाच्य (passive) रूप नहीं है।Em «Oh, the little cat slept quietly under the table.» (Simple Past), o verbo sleep (dormir) é intransitivo — não há objeto direto, então não há nada para promover a sujeito. Esta oração afirmativa não tem forma passiva.
В «Oh, the little cat did not sleep quietly under the table.» (Simple в Past) глагол sleep (спать) непереходный — прямого дополнения нет, значит, повышать в подлежащее нечего. У этого отрицательного предложения пассивной формы не существует.«Oh, the little cat did not sleep quietly under the table.» (Simple Past'da) sleep (uxlamoq) o'timsiz fe'l — to'g'ri to'ldiruvchi yo'q, shuning uchun egaga ko'chiradigan narsa yo'q. Bu inkor gapning passiv shakli mavjud emas.In "Oh, the little cat did not sleep quietly under the table." (Simple Past), the verb sleep is intransitive — there is no direct object, so there is nothing to promote to subject. This negative sentence has no passive form.En «Oh, the little cat did not sleep quietly under the table.» (Simple Past), el verbo sleep (dormir) es intransitivo — no hay complemento directo, así que no hay nada que elevar a sujeto. Esta oración negativa no tiene forma pasiva.在“Oh, the little cat did not sleep quietly under the table.”(Simple Past)中,动词 sleep(睡觉) 是不及物动词——没有直接宾语,因此没有可以提升为主语的成分。这个否定句没有被动语态形式。"Oh, the little cat did not sleep quietly under the table." (Simple Past) में क्रिया sleep (सोना) अकर्मक है — कोई प्रत्यक्ष कर्म (direct object) नहीं है, इसलिए कर्ता (subject) बनाने के लिए कुछ नहीं है। इस नकारात्मक वाक्य का कोई कर्मवाच्य (passive) रूप नहीं है।Em «Oh, the little cat did not sleep quietly under the table.» (Simple Past), o verbo sleep (dormir) é intransitivo — não há objeto direto, então não há nada para promover a sujeito. Esta oração negativa não tem forma passiva.
В «Oh, did the little cat sleep quietly under the table?» (Simple в Past) глагол sleep (спать) непереходный — прямого дополнения нет, значит, повышать в подлежащее нечего. У этого вопросительного предложения пассивной формы не существует.«Oh, did the little cat sleep quietly under the table?» (Simple Past'da) sleep (uxlamoq) o'timsiz fe'l — to'g'ri to'ldiruvchi yo'q, shuning uchun egaga ko'chiradigan narsa yo'q. Bu so'roq gapning passiv shakli mavjud emas.In "Oh, did the little cat sleep quietly under the table?" (Simple Past), the verb sleep is intransitive — there is no direct object, so there is nothing to promote to subject. This interrogative sentence has no passive form.En «Oh, did the little cat sleep quietly under the table?» (Simple Past), el verbo sleep (dormir) es intransitivo — no hay complemento directo, así que no hay nada que elevar a sujeto. Esta oración interrogativa no tiene forma pasiva.在“Oh, did the little cat sleep quietly under the table?”(Simple Past)中,动词 sleep(睡觉) 是不及物动词——没有直接宾语,因此没有可以提升为主语的成分。这个疑问句没有被动语态形式。"Oh, did the little cat sleep quietly under the table?" (Simple Past) में क्रिया sleep (सोना) अकर्मक है — कोई प्रत्यक्ष कर्म (direct object) नहीं है, इसलिए कर्ता (subject) बनाने के लिए कुछ नहीं है। इस प्रश्नवाचक वाक्य का कोई कर्मवाच्य (passive) रूप नहीं है।Em «Oh, did the little cat sleep quietly under the table?» (Simple Past), o verbo sleep (dormir) é intransitivo — não há objeto direto, então não há nada para promover a sujeito. Esta oração interrogativa não tem forma passiva.
В «Oh, the little cat was sleeping quietly under the table.» (Continuous в Past) глагол sleep (спать) непереходный — прямого дополнения нет, значит, повышать в подлежащее нечего. У этого утвердительного предложения пассивной формы не существует.«Oh, the little cat was sleeping quietly under the table.» (Continuous Past'da) sleep (uxlamoq) o'timsiz fe'l — to'g'ri to'ldiruvchi yo'q, shuning uchun egaga ko'chiradigan narsa yo'q. Bu darak gapning passiv shakli mavjud emas.In "Oh, the little cat was sleeping quietly under the table." (Continuous Past), the verb sleep is intransitive — there is no direct object, so there is nothing to promote to subject. This affirmative sentence has no passive form.En «Oh, the little cat was sleeping quietly under the table.» (Continuous Past), el verbo sleep (dormir) es intransitivo — no hay complemento directo, así que no hay nada que elevar a sujeto. Esta oración afirmativa no tiene forma pasiva.在“Oh, the little cat was sleeping quietly under the table.”(Continuous Past)中,动词 sleep(睡觉) 是不及物动词——没有直接宾语,因此没有可以提升为主语的成分。这个陈述句没有被动语态形式。"Oh, the little cat was sleeping quietly under the table." (Continuous Past) में क्रिया sleep (सोना) अकर्मक है — कोई प्रत्यक्ष कर्म (direct object) नहीं है, इसलिए कर्ता (subject) बनाने के लिए कुछ नहीं है। इस सकारात्मक वाक्य का कोई कर्मवाच्य (passive) रूप नहीं है।Em «Oh, the little cat was sleeping quietly under the table.» (Continuous Past), o verbo sleep (dormir) é intransitivo — não há objeto direto, então não há nada para promover a sujeito. Esta oração afirmativa não tem forma passiva.
В «Oh, the little cat was not sleeping quietly under the table.» (Continuous в Past) глагол sleep (спать) непереходный — прямого дополнения нет, значит, повышать в подлежащее нечего. У этого отрицательного предложения пассивной формы не существует.«Oh, the little cat was not sleeping quietly under the table.» (Continuous Past'da) sleep (uxlamoq) o'timsiz fe'l — to'g'ri to'ldiruvchi yo'q, shuning uchun egaga ko'chiradigan narsa yo'q. Bu inkor gapning passiv shakli mavjud emas.In "Oh, the little cat was not sleeping quietly under the table." (Continuous Past), the verb sleep is intransitive — there is no direct object, so there is nothing to promote to subject. This negative sentence has no passive form.En «Oh, the little cat was not sleeping quietly under the table.» (Continuous Past), el verbo sleep (dormir) es intransitivo — no hay complemento directo, así que no hay nada que elevar a sujeto. Esta oración negativa no tiene forma pasiva.在“Oh, the little cat was not sleeping quietly under the table.”(Continuous Past)中,动词 sleep(睡觉) 是不及物动词——没有直接宾语,因此没有可以提升为主语的成分。这个否定句没有被动语态形式。"Oh, the little cat was not sleeping quietly under the table." (Continuous Past) में क्रिया sleep (सोना) अकर्मक है — कोई प्रत्यक्ष कर्म (direct object) नहीं है, इसलिए कर्ता (subject) बनाने के लिए कुछ नहीं है। इस नकारात्मक वाक्य का कोई कर्मवाच्य (passive) रूप नहीं है।Em «Oh, the little cat was not sleeping quietly under the table.» (Continuous Past), o verbo sleep (dormir) é intransitivo — não há objeto direto, então não há nada para promover a sujeito. Esta oração negativa não tem forma passiva.
В «Oh, was the little cat sleeping quietly under the table?» (Continuous в Past) глагол sleep (спать) непереходный — прямого дополнения нет, значит, повышать в подлежащее нечего. У этого вопросительного предложения пассивной формы не существует.«Oh, was the little cat sleeping quietly under the table?» (Continuous Past'da) sleep (uxlamoq) o'timsiz fe'l — to'g'ri to'ldiruvchi yo'q, shuning uchun egaga ko'chiradigan narsa yo'q. Bu so'roq gapning passiv shakli mavjud emas.In "Oh, was the little cat sleeping quietly under the table?" (Continuous Past), the verb sleep is intransitive — there is no direct object, so there is nothing to promote to subject. This interrogative sentence has no passive form.En «Oh, was the little cat sleeping quietly under the table?» (Continuous Past), el verbo sleep (dormir) es intransitivo — no hay complemento directo, así que no hay nada que elevar a sujeto. Esta oración interrogativa no tiene forma pasiva.在“Oh, was the little cat sleeping quietly under the table?”(Continuous Past)中,动词 sleep(睡觉) 是不及物动词——没有直接宾语,因此没有可以提升为主语的成分。这个疑问句没有被动语态形式。"Oh, was the little cat sleeping quietly under the table?" (Continuous Past) में क्रिया sleep (सोना) अकर्मक है — कोई प्रत्यक्ष कर्म (direct object) नहीं है, इसलिए कर्ता (subject) बनाने के लिए कुछ नहीं है। इस प्रश्नवाचक वाक्य का कोई कर्मवाच्य (passive) रूप नहीं है।Em «Oh, was the little cat sleeping quietly under the table?» (Continuous Past), o verbo sleep (dormir) é intransitivo — não há objeto direto, então não há nada para promover a sujeito. Esta oração interrogativa não tem forma passiva.
В «Oh, the little cat had slept quietly under the table.» (Perfect в Past) глагол sleep (спать) непереходный — прямого дополнения нет, значит, повышать в подлежащее нечего. У этого утвердительного предложения пассивной формы не существует.«Oh, the little cat had slept quietly under the table.» (Perfect Past'da) sleep (uxlamoq) o'timsiz fe'l — to'g'ri to'ldiruvchi yo'q, shuning uchun egaga ko'chiradigan narsa yo'q. Bu darak gapning passiv shakli mavjud emas.In "Oh, the little cat had slept quietly under the table." (Perfect Past), the verb sleep is intransitive — there is no direct object, so there is nothing to promote to subject. This affirmative sentence has no passive form.En «Oh, the little cat had slept quietly under the table.» (Perfect Past), el verbo sleep (dormir) es intransitivo — no hay complemento directo, así que no hay nada que elevar a sujeto. Esta oración afirmativa no tiene forma pasiva.在“Oh, the little cat had slept quietly under the table.”(Perfect Past)中,动词 sleep(睡觉) 是不及物动词——没有直接宾语,因此没有可以提升为主语的成分。这个陈述句没有被动语态形式。"Oh, the little cat had slept quietly under the table." (Perfect Past) में क्रिया sleep (सोना) अकर्मक है — कोई प्रत्यक्ष कर्म (direct object) नहीं है, इसलिए कर्ता (subject) बनाने के लिए कुछ नहीं है। इस सकारात्मक वाक्य का कोई कर्मवाच्य (passive) रूप नहीं है।Em «Oh, the little cat had slept quietly under the table.» (Perfect Past), o verbo sleep (dormir) é intransitivo — não há objeto direto, então não há nada para promover a sujeito. Esta oração afirmativa não tem forma passiva.
В «Oh, the little cat had not slept quietly under the table.» (Perfect в Past) глагол sleep (спать) непереходный — прямого дополнения нет, значит, повышать в подлежащее нечего. У этого отрицательного предложения пассивной формы не существует.«Oh, the little cat had not slept quietly under the table.» (Perfect Past'da) sleep (uxlamoq) o'timsiz fe'l — to'g'ri to'ldiruvchi yo'q, shuning uchun egaga ko'chiradigan narsa yo'q. Bu inkor gapning passiv shakli mavjud emas.In "Oh, the little cat had not slept quietly under the table." (Perfect Past), the verb sleep is intransitive — there is no direct object, so there is nothing to promote to subject. This negative sentence has no passive form.En «Oh, the little cat had not slept quietly under the table.» (Perfect Past), el verbo sleep (dormir) es intransitivo — no hay complemento directo, así que no hay nada que elevar a sujeto. Esta oración negativa no tiene forma pasiva.在“Oh, the little cat had not slept quietly under the table.”(Perfect Past)中,动词 sleep(睡觉) 是不及物动词——没有直接宾语,因此没有可以提升为主语的成分。这个否定句没有被动语态形式。"Oh, the little cat had not slept quietly under the table." (Perfect Past) में क्रिया sleep (सोना) अकर्मक है — कोई प्रत्यक्ष कर्म (direct object) नहीं है, इसलिए कर्ता (subject) बनाने के लिए कुछ नहीं है। इस नकारात्मक वाक्य का कोई कर्मवाच्य (passive) रूप नहीं है।Em «Oh, the little cat had not slept quietly under the table.» (Perfect Past), o verbo sleep (dormir) é intransitivo — não há objeto direto, então não há nada para promover a sujeito. Esta oração negativa não tem forma passiva.
В «Oh, had the little cat slept quietly under the table?» (Perfect в Past) глагол sleep (спать) непереходный — прямого дополнения нет, значит, повышать в подлежащее нечего. У этого вопросительного предложения пассивной формы не существует.«Oh, had the little cat slept quietly under the table?» (Perfect Past'da) sleep (uxlamoq) o'timsiz fe'l — to'g'ri to'ldiruvchi yo'q, shuning uchun egaga ko'chiradigan narsa yo'q. Bu so'roq gapning passiv shakli mavjud emas.In "Oh, had the little cat slept quietly under the table?" (Perfect Past), the verb sleep is intransitive — there is no direct object, so there is nothing to promote to subject. This interrogative sentence has no passive form.En «Oh, had the little cat slept quietly under the table?» (Perfect Past), el verbo sleep (dormir) es intransitivo — no hay complemento directo, así que no hay nada que elevar a sujeto. Esta oración interrogativa no tiene forma pasiva.在“Oh, had the little cat slept quietly under the table?”(Perfect Past)中,动词 sleep(睡觉) 是不及物动词——没有直接宾语,因此没有可以提升为主语的成分。这个疑问句没有被动语态形式。"Oh, had the little cat slept quietly under the table?" (Perfect Past) में क्रिया sleep (सोना) अकर्मक है — कोई प्रत्यक्ष कर्म (direct object) नहीं है, इसलिए कर्ता (subject) बनाने के लिए कुछ नहीं है। इस प्रश्नवाचक वाक्य का कोई कर्मवाच्य (passive) रूप नहीं है।Em «Oh, had the little cat slept quietly under the table?» (Perfect Past), o verbo sleep (dormir) é intransitivo — não há objeto direto, então não há nada para promover a sujeito. Esta oração interrogativa não tem forma passiva.
В «Oh, the little cat will sleep quietly under the table.» (Simple в Future) глагол sleep (спать) непереходный — прямого дополнения нет, значит, повышать в подлежащее нечего. У этого утвердительного предложения пассивной формы не существует.«Oh, the little cat will sleep quietly under the table.» (Simple Future'da) sleep (uxlamoq) o'timsiz fe'l — to'g'ri to'ldiruvchi yo'q, shuning uchun egaga ko'chiradigan narsa yo'q. Bu darak gapning passiv shakli mavjud emas.In "Oh, the little cat will sleep quietly under the table." (Simple Future), the verb sleep is intransitive — there is no direct object, so there is nothing to promote to subject. This affirmative sentence has no passive form.En «Oh, the little cat will sleep quietly under the table.» (Simple Future), el verbo sleep (dormir) es intransitivo — no hay complemento directo, así que no hay nada que elevar a sujeto. Esta oración afirmativa no tiene forma pasiva.在“Oh, the little cat will sleep quietly under the table.”(Simple Future)中,动词 sleep(睡觉) 是不及物动词——没有直接宾语,因此没有可以提升为主语的成分。这个陈述句没有被动语态形式。"Oh, the little cat will sleep quietly under the table." (Simple Future) में क्रिया sleep (सोना) अकर्मक है — कोई प्रत्यक्ष कर्म (direct object) नहीं है, इसलिए कर्ता (subject) बनाने के लिए कुछ नहीं है। इस सकारात्मक वाक्य का कोई कर्मवाच्य (passive) रूप नहीं है।Em «Oh, the little cat will sleep quietly under the table.» (Simple Future), o verbo sleep (dormir) é intransitivo — não há objeto direto, então não há nada para promover a sujeito. Esta oração afirmativa não tem forma passiva.
В «Oh, the little cat will not sleep quietly under the table.» (Simple в Future) глагол sleep (спать) непереходный — прямого дополнения нет, значит, повышать в подлежащее нечего. У этого отрицательного предложения пассивной формы не существует.«Oh, the little cat will not sleep quietly under the table.» (Simple Future'da) sleep (uxlamoq) o'timsiz fe'l — to'g'ri to'ldiruvchi yo'q, shuning uchun egaga ko'chiradigan narsa yo'q. Bu inkor gapning passiv shakli mavjud emas.In "Oh, the little cat will not sleep quietly under the table." (Simple Future), the verb sleep is intransitive — there is no direct object, so there is nothing to promote to subject. This negative sentence has no passive form.En «Oh, the little cat will not sleep quietly under the table.» (Simple Future), el verbo sleep (dormir) es intransitivo — no hay complemento directo, así que no hay nada que elevar a sujeto. Esta oración negativa no tiene forma pasiva.在“Oh, the little cat will not sleep quietly under the table.”(Simple Future)中,动词 sleep(睡觉) 是不及物动词——没有直接宾语,因此没有可以提升为主语的成分。这个否定句没有被动语态形式。"Oh, the little cat will not sleep quietly under the table." (Simple Future) में क्रिया sleep (सोना) अकर्मक है — कोई प्रत्यक्ष कर्म (direct object) नहीं है, इसलिए कर्ता (subject) बनाने के लिए कुछ नहीं है। इस नकारात्मक वाक्य का कोई कर्मवाच्य (passive) रूप नहीं है।Em «Oh, the little cat will not sleep quietly under the table.» (Simple Future), o verbo sleep (dormir) é intransitivo — não há objeto direto, então não há nada para promover a sujeito. Esta oração negativa não tem forma passiva.
В «Oh, will the little cat sleep quietly under the table?» (Simple в Future) глагол sleep (спать) непереходный — прямого дополнения нет, значит, повышать в подлежащее нечего. У этого вопросительного предложения пассивной формы не существует.«Oh, will the little cat sleep quietly under the table?» (Simple Future'da) sleep (uxlamoq) o'timsiz fe'l — to'g'ri to'ldiruvchi yo'q, shuning uchun egaga ko'chiradigan narsa yo'q. Bu so'roq gapning passiv shakli mavjud emas.In "Oh, will the little cat sleep quietly under the table?" (Simple Future), the verb sleep is intransitive — there is no direct object, so there is nothing to promote to subject. This interrogative sentence has no passive form.En «Oh, will the little cat sleep quietly under the table?» (Simple Future), el verbo sleep (dormir) es intransitivo — no hay complemento directo, así que no hay nada que elevar a sujeto. Esta oración interrogativa no tiene forma pasiva.在“Oh, will the little cat sleep quietly under the table?”(Simple Future)中,动词 sleep(睡觉) 是不及物动词——没有直接宾语,因此没有可以提升为主语的成分。这个疑问句没有被动语态形式。"Oh, will the little cat sleep quietly under the table?" (Simple Future) में क्रिया sleep (सोना) अकर्मक है — कोई प्रत्यक्ष कर्म (direct object) नहीं है, इसलिए कर्ता (subject) बनाने के लिए कुछ नहीं है। इस प्रश्नवाचक वाक्य का कोई कर्मवाच्य (passive) रूप नहीं है।Em «Oh, will the little cat sleep quietly under the table?» (Simple Future), o verbo sleep (dormir) é intransitivo — não há objeto direto, então não há nada para promover a sujeito. Esta oração interrogativa não tem forma passiva.
В «Oh, the little cat will be sleeping quietly under the table.» (Continuous в Future) глагол sleep (спать) непереходный — прямого дополнения нет, значит, повышать в подлежащее нечего. У этого утвердительного предложения пассивной формы не существует.«Oh, the little cat will be sleeping quietly under the table.» (Continuous Future'da) sleep (uxlamoq) o'timsiz fe'l — to'g'ri to'ldiruvchi yo'q, shuning uchun egaga ko'chiradigan narsa yo'q. Bu darak gapning passiv shakli mavjud emas.In "Oh, the little cat will be sleeping quietly under the table." (Continuous Future), the verb sleep is intransitive — there is no direct object, so there is nothing to promote to subject. This affirmative sentence has no passive form.En «Oh, the little cat will be sleeping quietly under the table.» (Continuous Future), el verbo sleep (dormir) es intransitivo — no hay complemento directo, así que no hay nada que elevar a sujeto. Esta oración afirmativa no tiene forma pasiva.在“Oh, the little cat will be sleeping quietly under the table.”(Continuous Future)中,动词 sleep(睡觉) 是不及物动词——没有直接宾语,因此没有可以提升为主语的成分。这个陈述句没有被动语态形式。"Oh, the little cat will be sleeping quietly under the table." (Continuous Future) में क्रिया sleep (सोना) अकर्मक है — कोई प्रत्यक्ष कर्म (direct object) नहीं है, इसलिए कर्ता (subject) बनाने के लिए कुछ नहीं है। इस सकारात्मक वाक्य का कोई कर्मवाच्य (passive) रूप नहीं है।Em «Oh, the little cat will be sleeping quietly under the table.» (Continuous Future), o verbo sleep (dormir) é intransitivo — não há objeto direto, então não há nada para promover a sujeito. Esta oração afirmativa não tem forma passiva.
В «Oh, the little cat will not be sleeping quietly under the table.» (Continuous в Future) глагол sleep (спать) непереходный — прямого дополнения нет, значит, повышать в подлежащее нечего. У этого отрицательного предложения пассивной формы не существует.«Oh, the little cat will not be sleeping quietly under the table.» (Continuous Future'da) sleep (uxlamoq) o'timsiz fe'l — to'g'ri to'ldiruvchi yo'q, shuning uchun egaga ko'chiradigan narsa yo'q. Bu inkor gapning passiv shakli mavjud emas.In "Oh, the little cat will not be sleeping quietly under the table." (Continuous Future), the verb sleep is intransitive — there is no direct object, so there is nothing to promote to subject. This negative sentence has no passive form.En «Oh, the little cat will not be sleeping quietly under the table.» (Continuous Future), el verbo sleep (dormir) es intransitivo — no hay complemento directo, así que no hay nada que elevar a sujeto. Esta oración negativa no tiene forma pasiva.在“Oh, the little cat will not be sleeping quietly under the table.”(Continuous Future)中,动词 sleep(睡觉) 是不及物动词——没有直接宾语,因此没有可以提升为主语的成分。这个否定句没有被动语态形式。"Oh, the little cat will not be sleeping quietly under the table." (Continuous Future) में क्रिया sleep (सोना) अकर्मक है — कोई प्रत्यक्ष कर्म (direct object) नहीं है, इसलिए कर्ता (subject) बनाने के लिए कुछ नहीं है। इस नकारात्मक वाक्य का कोई कर्मवाच्य (passive) रूप नहीं है।Em «Oh, the little cat will not be sleeping quietly under the table.» (Continuous Future), o verbo sleep (dormir) é intransitivo — não há objeto direto, então não há nada para promover a sujeito. Esta oração negativa não tem forma passiva.
В «Oh, will the little cat be sleeping quietly under the table?» (Continuous в Future) глагол sleep (спать) непереходный — прямого дополнения нет, значит, повышать в подлежащее нечего. У этого вопросительного предложения пассивной формы не существует.«Oh, will the little cat be sleeping quietly under the table?» (Continuous Future'da) sleep (uxlamoq) o'timsiz fe'l — to'g'ri to'ldiruvchi yo'q, shuning uchun egaga ko'chiradigan narsa yo'q. Bu so'roq gapning passiv shakli mavjud emas.In "Oh, will the little cat be sleeping quietly under the table?" (Continuous Future), the verb sleep is intransitive — there is no direct object, so there is nothing to promote to subject. This interrogative sentence has no passive form.En «Oh, will the little cat be sleeping quietly under the table?» (Continuous Future), el verbo sleep (dormir) es intransitivo — no hay complemento directo, así que no hay nada que elevar a sujeto. Esta oración interrogativa no tiene forma pasiva.在“Oh, will the little cat be sleeping quietly under the table?”(Continuous Future)中,动词 sleep(睡觉) 是不及物动词——没有直接宾语,因此没有可以提升为主语的成分。这个疑问句没有被动语态形式。"Oh, will the little cat be sleeping quietly under the table?" (Continuous Future) में क्रिया sleep (सोना) अकर्मक है — कोई प्रत्यक्ष कर्म (direct object) नहीं है, इसलिए कर्ता (subject) बनाने के लिए कुछ नहीं है। इस प्रश्नवाचक वाक्य का कोई कर्मवाच्य (passive) रूप नहीं है।Em «Oh, will the little cat be sleeping quietly under the table?» (Continuous Future), o verbo sleep (dormir) é intransitivo — não há objeto direto, então não há nada para promover a sujeito. Esta oração interrogativa não tem forma passiva.
В «Oh, the little cat will have slept quietly under the table.» (Perfect в Future) глагол sleep (спать) непереходный — прямого дополнения нет, значит, повышать в подлежащее нечего. У этого утвердительного предложения пассивной формы не существует.«Oh, the little cat will have slept quietly under the table.» (Perfect Future'da) sleep (uxlamoq) o'timsiz fe'l — to'g'ri to'ldiruvchi yo'q, shuning uchun egaga ko'chiradigan narsa yo'q. Bu darak gapning passiv shakli mavjud emas.In "Oh, the little cat will have slept quietly under the table." (Perfect Future), the verb sleep is intransitive — there is no direct object, so there is nothing to promote to subject. This affirmative sentence has no passive form.En «Oh, the little cat will have slept quietly under the table.» (Perfect Future), el verbo sleep (dormir) es intransitivo — no hay complemento directo, así que no hay nada que elevar a sujeto. Esta oración afirmativa no tiene forma pasiva.在“Oh, the little cat will have slept quietly under the table.”(Perfect Future)中,动词 sleep(睡觉) 是不及物动词——没有直接宾语,因此没有可以提升为主语的成分。这个陈述句没有被动语态形式。"Oh, the little cat will have slept quietly under the table." (Perfect Future) में क्रिया sleep (सोना) अकर्मक है — कोई प्रत्यक्ष कर्म (direct object) नहीं है, इसलिए कर्ता (subject) बनाने के लिए कुछ नहीं है। इस सकारात्मक वाक्य का कोई कर्मवाच्य (passive) रूप नहीं है।Em «Oh, the little cat will have slept quietly under the table.» (Perfect Future), o verbo sleep (dormir) é intransitivo — não há objeto direto, então não há nada para promover a sujeito. Esta oração afirmativa não tem forma passiva.
В «Oh, the little cat will not have slept quietly under the table.» (Perfect в Future) глагол sleep (спать) непереходный — прямого дополнения нет, значит, повышать в подлежащее нечего. У этого отрицательного предложения пассивной формы не существует.«Oh, the little cat will not have slept quietly under the table.» (Perfect Future'da) sleep (uxlamoq) o'timsiz fe'l — to'g'ri to'ldiruvchi yo'q, shuning uchun egaga ko'chiradigan narsa yo'q. Bu inkor gapning passiv shakli mavjud emas.In "Oh, the little cat will not have slept quietly under the table." (Perfect Future), the verb sleep is intransitive — there is no direct object, so there is nothing to promote to subject. This negative sentence has no passive form.En «Oh, the little cat will not have slept quietly under the table.» (Perfect Future), el verbo sleep (dormir) es intransitivo — no hay complemento directo, así que no hay nada que elevar a sujeto. Esta oración negativa no tiene forma pasiva.在“Oh, the little cat will not have slept quietly under the table.”(Perfect Future)中,动词 sleep(睡觉) 是不及物动词——没有直接宾语,因此没有可以提升为主语的成分。这个否定句没有被动语态形式。"Oh, the little cat will not have slept quietly under the table." (Perfect Future) में क्रिया sleep (सोना) अकर्मक है — कोई प्रत्यक्ष कर्म (direct object) नहीं है, इसलिए कर्ता (subject) बनाने के लिए कुछ नहीं है। इस नकारात्मक वाक्य का कोई कर्मवाच्य (passive) रूप नहीं है।Em «Oh, the little cat will not have slept quietly under the table.» (Perfect Future), o verbo sleep (dormir) é intransitivo — não há objeto direto, então não há nada para promover a sujeito. Esta oração negativa não tem forma passiva.
В «Oh, will the little cat have slept quietly under the table?» (Perfect в Future) глагол sleep (спать) непереходный — прямого дополнения нет, значит, повышать в подлежащее нечего. У этого вопросительного предложения пассивной формы не существует.«Oh, will the little cat have slept quietly under the table?» (Perfect Future'da) sleep (uxlamoq) o'timsiz fe'l — to'g'ri to'ldiruvchi yo'q, shuning uchun egaga ko'chiradigan narsa yo'q. Bu so'roq gapning passiv shakli mavjud emas.In "Oh, will the little cat have slept quietly under the table?" (Perfect Future), the verb sleep is intransitive — there is no direct object, so there is nothing to promote to subject. This interrogative sentence has no passive form.En «Oh, will the little cat have slept quietly under the table?» (Perfect Future), el verbo sleep (dormir) es intransitivo — no hay complemento directo, así que no hay nada que elevar a sujeto. Esta oración interrogativa no tiene forma pasiva.在“Oh, will the little cat have slept quietly under the table?”(Perfect Future)中,动词 sleep(睡觉) 是不及物动词——没有直接宾语,因此没有可以提升为主语的成分。这个疑问句没有被动语态形式。"Oh, will the little cat have slept quietly under the table?" (Perfect Future) में क्रिया sleep (सोना) अकर्मक है — कोई प्रत्यक्ष कर्म (direct object) नहीं है, इसलिए कर्ता (subject) बनाने के लिए कुछ नहीं है। इस प्रश्नवाचक वाक्य का कोई कर्मवाच्य (passive) रूप नहीं है।Em «Oh, will the little cat have slept quietly under the table?» (Perfect Future), o verbo sleep (dormir) é intransitivo — não há objeto direto, então não há nada para promover a sujeito. Esta oração interrogativa não tem forma passiva.
Indep + (Attr+Attr) + S + V + Adv(Manner) + Adv(Place)
Indep + (Attr+Attr) + S + V + NOT + Adv(Manner) + Adv(Place)
Indep + V(aux) + (Attr+Attr) + S + V + Adv(Manner) + Adv(Place)
—
Interjection (Oh) в начале; артикль the перед Subject — тоже Attribute.Interjection (Oh) boshida; Subject'dan oldingi the ham Attribute.Interjection (Oh) at the start; the article the before the Subject is also an Attribute.Interjection (Oh) al principio; el artículo the antes del Subject también es un Attribute.句首的感叹词 Interjection(Oh);主语(Subject)前的冠词 the 也是定语(Attribute)。शुरुआत में विस्मयादिबोधक Interjection (Oh); Subject से पहले का article the भी एक Attribute है।Interjection (Oh) no início; o artigo the antes do Subject também é um Attribute.
be — сам себе вспомогательный глагол (в Continuous/Perfect тоже участвует), do-support не нужен.be — o'zi yordamchi fe'l (Continuous/Perfect'da ham qatnashadi), do-support kerak emas.be is itself an auxiliary verb (also used in Continuous/Perfect), so do-support is not needed.be es en sí mismo un verbo auxiliar (también participa en Continuous/Perfect), así que no se necesita do-support.be 本身就是助动词(在 Continuous/Perfect 中也起作用),因此不需要 do-support。be स्वयं एक सहायक क्रिया है (Continuous/Perfect में भी भाग लेती है), इसलिए do-support की आवश्यकता नहीं है।be é em si um verbo auxiliar (também participa em Continuous/Perfect), então não é necessário do-support.
Вспомогательный выходит вперёд, интерьекция — нет.Yordamchi oldinga chiqadi, interyeksiya esa yo'q.The auxiliary moves to the front; the interjection does not.El auxiliar se adelanta; la interjección no.助动词提到句首,但感叹词不会。सहायक क्रिया आगे आती है, विस्मयादिबोधक (interjection) नहीं।O auxiliar vai para a frente; a interjeição não.
В «Oh, the little cat sleeps quietly under the table.» (Simple в Present) глагол sleep (спать) непереходный — прямого дополнения нет, значит, повышать в подлежащее нечего. У этого утвердительного предложения пассивной формы не существует.«Oh, the little cat sleeps quietly under the table.» (Simple Present'da) sleep (uxlamoq) o'timsiz fe'l — to'g'ri to'ldiruvchi yo'q, shuning uchun egaga ko'chiradigan narsa yo'q. Bu darak gapning passiv shakli mavjud emas.In "Oh, the little cat sleeps quietly under the table." (Simple Present), the verb sleep is intransitive — there is no direct object, so there is nothing to promote to subject. This affirmative sentence has no passive form.En «Oh, the little cat sleeps quietly under the table.» (Simple Present), el verbo sleep (dormir) es intransitivo — no hay complemento directo, así que no hay nada que elevar a sujeto. Esta oración afirmativa no tiene forma pasiva.在“Oh, the little cat sleeps quietly under the table.”(Simple Present)中,动词 sleep(睡觉) 是不及物动词——没有直接宾语,因此没有可以提升为主语的成分。这个陈述句没有被动语态形式。"Oh, the little cat sleeps quietly under the table." (Simple Present) में क्रिया sleep (सोना) अकर्मक है — कोई प्रत्यक्ष कर्म (direct object) नहीं है, इसलिए कर्ता (subject) बनाने के लिए कुछ नहीं है। इस सकारात्मक वाक्य का कोई कर्मवाच्य (passive) रूप नहीं है।Em «Oh, the little cat sleeps quietly under the table.» (Simple Present), o verbo sleep (dormir) é intransitivo — não há objeto direto, então não há nada para promover a sujeito. Esta oração afirmativa não tem forma passiva.
9
The weather being terrible, we stay home all day.
The weather being terrible, we do not stay home all day.
The weather being terrible, do we stay home all day?
The weather being terrible, we are staying home all day.
The weather being terrible, we are not staying home all day.
The weather being terrible, are we staying home all day?
The weather being terrible, we have stayed home all day.
The weather being terrible, we have not stayed home all day.
The weather being terrible, have we stayed home all day?
The weather being terrible, we stayed home all day.
The weather being terrible, we did not stay home all day.
The weather being terrible, did we stay home all day?
The weather being terrible, we were staying home all day.
The weather being terrible, we were not staying home all day.
The weather being terrible, were we staying home all day?
The weather being terrible, we had stayed home all day.
The weather being terrible, we had not stayed home all day.
The weather being terrible, had we stayed home all day?
The weather being terrible, we will stay home all day.
The weather being terrible, we will not stay home all day.
The weather being terrible, will we stay home all day?
The weather being terrible, we will be staying home all day.
The weather being terrible, we will not be staying home all day.
The weather being terrible, will we be staying home all day?
The weather being terrible, we will have stayed home all day.
The weather being terrible, we will not have stayed home all day.
The weather being terrible, will we have stayed home all day?
В «The weather being terrible, we stay home all day.» (Simple в Present) глагол stay (оставаться) непереходный — прямого дополнения нет, значит, повышать в подлежащее нечего. У этого утвердительного предложения пассивной формы не существует.«The weather being terrible, we stay home all day.» (Simple Present'da) stay (qolmoq) o'timsiz fe'l — to'g'ri to'ldiruvchi yo'q, shuning uchun egaga ko'chiradigan narsa yo'q. Bu darak gapning passiv shakli mavjud emas.In "The weather being terrible, we stay home all day." (Simple Present), the verb stay is intransitive — there is no direct object, so there is nothing to promote to subject. This affirmative sentence has no passive form.En «The weather being terrible, we stay home all day.» (Simple Present), el verbo stay (quedarse) es intransitivo — no hay complemento directo, así que no hay nada que elevar a sujeto. Esta oración afirmativa no tiene forma pasiva.在“The weather being terrible, we stay home all day.”(Simple Present)中,动词 stay(留下) 是不及物动词——没有直接宾语,因此没有可以提升为主语的成分。这个陈述句没有被动语态形式。"The weather being terrible, we stay home all day." (Simple Present) में क्रिया stay (रुकना) अकर्मक है — कोई प्रत्यक्ष कर्म (direct object) नहीं है, इसलिए कर्ता (subject) बनाने के लिए कुछ नहीं है। इस सकारात्मक वाक्य का कोई कर्मवाच्य (passive) रूप नहीं है।Em «The weather being terrible, we stay home all day.» (Simple Present), o verbo stay (ficar) é intransitivo — não há objeto direto, então não há nada para promover a sujeito. Esta oração afirmativa não tem forma passiva.
В «The weather being terrible, we do not stay home all day.» (Simple в Present) глагол stay (оставаться) непереходный — прямого дополнения нет, значит, повышать в подлежащее нечего. У этого отрицательного предложения пассивной формы не существует.«The weather being terrible, we do not stay home all day.» (Simple Present'da) stay (qolmoq) o'timsiz fe'l — to'g'ri to'ldiruvchi yo'q, shuning uchun egaga ko'chiradigan narsa yo'q. Bu inkor gapning passiv shakli mavjud emas.In "The weather being terrible, we do not stay home all day." (Simple Present), the verb stay is intransitive — there is no direct object, so there is nothing to promote to subject. This negative sentence has no passive form.En «The weather being terrible, we do not stay home all day.» (Simple Present), el verbo stay (quedarse) es intransitivo — no hay complemento directo, así que no hay nada que elevar a sujeto. Esta oración negativa no tiene forma pasiva.在“The weather being terrible, we do not stay home all day.”(Simple Present)中,动词 stay(留下) 是不及物动词——没有直接宾语,因此没有可以提升为主语的成分。这个否定句没有被动语态形式。"The weather being terrible, we do not stay home all day." (Simple Present) में क्रिया stay (रुकना) अकर्मक है — कोई प्रत्यक्ष कर्म (direct object) नहीं है, इसलिए कर्ता (subject) बनाने के लिए कुछ नहीं है। इस नकारात्मक वाक्य का कोई कर्मवाच्य (passive) रूप नहीं है।Em «The weather being terrible, we do not stay home all day.» (Simple Present), o verbo stay (ficar) é intransitivo — não há objeto direto, então não há nada para promover a sujeito. Esta oração negativa não tem forma passiva.
В «The weather being terrible, do we stay home all day?» (Simple в Present) глагол stay (оставаться) непереходный — прямого дополнения нет, значит, повышать в подлежащее нечего. У этого вопросительного предложения пассивной формы не существует.«The weather being terrible, do we stay home all day?» (Simple Present'da) stay (qolmoq) o'timsiz fe'l — to'g'ri to'ldiruvchi yo'q, shuning uchun egaga ko'chiradigan narsa yo'q. Bu so'roq gapning passiv shakli mavjud emas.In "The weather being terrible, do we stay home all day?" (Simple Present), the verb stay is intransitive — there is no direct object, so there is nothing to promote to subject. This interrogative sentence has no passive form.En «The weather being terrible, do we stay home all day?» (Simple Present), el verbo stay (quedarse) es intransitivo — no hay complemento directo, así que no hay nada que elevar a sujeto. Esta oración interrogativa no tiene forma pasiva.在“The weather being terrible, do we stay home all day?”(Simple Present)中,动词 stay(留下) 是不及物动词——没有直接宾语,因此没有可以提升为主语的成分。这个疑问句没有被动语态形式。"The weather being terrible, do we stay home all day?" (Simple Present) में क्रिया stay (रुकना) अकर्मक है — कोई प्रत्यक्ष कर्म (direct object) नहीं है, इसलिए कर्ता (subject) बनाने के लिए कुछ नहीं है। इस प्रश्नवाचक वाक्य का कोई कर्मवाच्य (passive) रूप नहीं है।Em «The weather being terrible, do we stay home all day?» (Simple Present), o verbo stay (ficar) é intransitivo — não há objeto direto, então não há nada para promover a sujeito. Esta oração interrogativa não tem forma passiva.
В «The weather being terrible, we are staying home all day.» (Continuous в Present) глагол stay (оставаться) непереходный — прямого дополнения нет, значит, повышать в подлежащее нечего. У этого утвердительного предложения пассивной формы не существует.«The weather being terrible, we are staying home all day.» (Continuous Present'da) stay (qolmoq) o'timsiz fe'l — to'g'ri to'ldiruvchi yo'q, shuning uchun egaga ko'chiradigan narsa yo'q. Bu darak gapning passiv shakli mavjud emas.In "The weather being terrible, we are staying home all day." (Continuous Present), the verb stay is intransitive — there is no direct object, so there is nothing to promote to subject. This affirmative sentence has no passive form.En «The weather being terrible, we are staying home all day.» (Continuous Present), el verbo stay (quedarse) es intransitivo — no hay complemento directo, así que no hay nada que elevar a sujeto. Esta oración afirmativa no tiene forma pasiva.在“The weather being terrible, we are staying home all day.”(Continuous Present)中,动词 stay(留下) 是不及物动词——没有直接宾语,因此没有可以提升为主语的成分。这个陈述句没有被动语态形式。"The weather being terrible, we are staying home all day." (Continuous Present) में क्रिया stay (रुकना) अकर्मक है — कोई प्रत्यक्ष कर्म (direct object) नहीं है, इसलिए कर्ता (subject) बनाने के लिए कुछ नहीं है। इस सकारात्मक वाक्य का कोई कर्मवाच्य (passive) रूप नहीं है।Em «The weather being terrible, we are staying home all day.» (Continuous Present), o verbo stay (ficar) é intransitivo — não há objeto direto, então não há nada para promover a sujeito. Esta oração afirmativa não tem forma passiva.
В «The weather being terrible, we are not staying home all day.» (Continuous в Present) глагол stay (оставаться) непереходный — прямого дополнения нет, значит, повышать в подлежащее нечего. У этого отрицательного предложения пассивной формы не существует.«The weather being terrible, we are not staying home all day.» (Continuous Present'da) stay (qolmoq) o'timsiz fe'l — to'g'ri to'ldiruvchi yo'q, shuning uchun egaga ko'chiradigan narsa yo'q. Bu inkor gapning passiv shakli mavjud emas.In "The weather being terrible, we are not staying home all day." (Continuous Present), the verb stay is intransitive — there is no direct object, so there is nothing to promote to subject. This negative sentence has no passive form.En «The weather being terrible, we are not staying home all day.» (Continuous Present), el verbo stay (quedarse) es intransitivo — no hay complemento directo, así que no hay nada que elevar a sujeto. Esta oración negativa no tiene forma pasiva.在“The weather being terrible, we are not staying home all day.”(Continuous Present)中,动词 stay(留下) 是不及物动词——没有直接宾语,因此没有可以提升为主语的成分。这个否定句没有被动语态形式。"The weather being terrible, we are not staying home all day." (Continuous Present) में क्रिया stay (रुकना) अकर्मक है — कोई प्रत्यक्ष कर्म (direct object) नहीं है, इसलिए कर्ता (subject) बनाने के लिए कुछ नहीं है। इस नकारात्मक वाक्य का कोई कर्मवाच्य (passive) रूप नहीं है।Em «The weather being terrible, we are not staying home all day.» (Continuous Present), o verbo stay (ficar) é intransitivo — não há objeto direto, então não há nada para promover a sujeito. Esta oração negativa não tem forma passiva.
В «The weather being terrible, are we staying home all day?» (Continuous в Present) глагол stay (оставаться) непереходный — прямого дополнения нет, значит, повышать в подлежащее нечего. У этого вопросительного предложения пассивной формы не существует.«The weather being terrible, are we staying home all day?» (Continuous Present'da) stay (qolmoq) o'timsiz fe'l — to'g'ri to'ldiruvchi yo'q, shuning uchun egaga ko'chiradigan narsa yo'q. Bu so'roq gapning passiv shakli mavjud emas.In "The weather being terrible, are we staying home all day?" (Continuous Present), the verb stay is intransitive — there is no direct object, so there is nothing to promote to subject. This interrogative sentence has no passive form.En «The weather being terrible, are we staying home all day?» (Continuous Present), el verbo stay (quedarse) es intransitivo — no hay complemento directo, así que no hay nada que elevar a sujeto. Esta oración interrogativa no tiene forma pasiva.在“The weather being terrible, are we staying home all day?”(Continuous Present)中,动词 stay(留下) 是不及物动词——没有直接宾语,因此没有可以提升为主语的成分。这个疑问句没有被动语态形式。"The weather being terrible, are we staying home all day?" (Continuous Present) में क्रिया stay (रुकना) अकर्मक है — कोई प्रत्यक्ष कर्म (direct object) नहीं है, इसलिए कर्ता (subject) बनाने के लिए कुछ नहीं है। इस प्रश्नवाचक वाक्य का कोई कर्मवाच्य (passive) रूप नहीं है।Em «The weather being terrible, are we staying home all day?» (Continuous Present), o verbo stay (ficar) é intransitivo — não há objeto direto, então não há nada para promover a sujeito. Esta oração interrogativa não tem forma passiva.
В «The weather being terrible, we have stayed home all day.» (Perfect в Present) глагол stay (оставаться) непереходный — прямого дополнения нет, значит, повышать в подлежащее нечего. У этого утвердительного предложения пассивной формы не существует.«The weather being terrible, we have stayed home all day.» (Perfect Present'da) stay (qolmoq) o'timsiz fe'l — to'g'ri to'ldiruvchi yo'q, shuning uchun egaga ko'chiradigan narsa yo'q. Bu darak gapning passiv shakli mavjud emas.In "The weather being terrible, we have stayed home all day." (Perfect Present), the verb stay is intransitive — there is no direct object, so there is nothing to promote to subject. This affirmative sentence has no passive form.En «The weather being terrible, we have stayed home all day.» (Perfect Present), el verbo stay (quedarse) es intransitivo — no hay complemento directo, así que no hay nada que elevar a sujeto. Esta oración afirmativa no tiene forma pasiva.在“The weather being terrible, we have stayed home all day.”(Perfect Present)中,动词 stay(留下) 是不及物动词——没有直接宾语,因此没有可以提升为主语的成分。这个陈述句没有被动语态形式。"The weather being terrible, we have stayed home all day." (Perfect Present) में क्रिया stay (रुकना) अकर्मक है — कोई प्रत्यक्ष कर्म (direct object) नहीं है, इसलिए कर्ता (subject) बनाने के लिए कुछ नहीं है। इस सकारात्मक वाक्य का कोई कर्मवाच्य (passive) रूप नहीं है।Em «The weather being terrible, we have stayed home all day.» (Perfect Present), o verbo stay (ficar) é intransitivo — não há objeto direto, então não há nada para promover a sujeito. Esta oração afirmativa não tem forma passiva.
В «The weather being terrible, we have not stayed home all day.» (Perfect в Present) глагол stay (оставаться) непереходный — прямого дополнения нет, значит, повышать в подлежащее нечего. У этого отрицательного предложения пассивной формы не существует.«The weather being terrible, we have not stayed home all day.» (Perfect Present'da) stay (qolmoq) o'timsiz fe'l — to'g'ri to'ldiruvchi yo'q, shuning uchun egaga ko'chiradigan narsa yo'q. Bu inkor gapning passiv shakli mavjud emas.In "The weather being terrible, we have not stayed home all day." (Perfect Present), the verb stay is intransitive — there is no direct object, so there is nothing to promote to subject. This negative sentence has no passive form.En «The weather being terrible, we have not stayed home all day.» (Perfect Present), el verbo stay (quedarse) es intransitivo — no hay complemento directo, así que no hay nada que elevar a sujeto. Esta oración negativa no tiene forma pasiva.在“The weather being terrible, we have not stayed home all day.”(Perfect Present)中,动词 stay(留下) 是不及物动词——没有直接宾语,因此没有可以提升为主语的成分。这个否定句没有被动语态形式。"The weather being terrible, we have not stayed home all day." (Perfect Present) में क्रिया stay (रुकना) अकर्मक है — कोई प्रत्यक्ष कर्म (direct object) नहीं है, इसलिए कर्ता (subject) बनाने के लिए कुछ नहीं है। इस नकारात्मक वाक्य का कोई कर्मवाच्य (passive) रूप नहीं है।Em «The weather being terrible, we have not stayed home all day.» (Perfect Present), o verbo stay (ficar) é intransitivo — não há objeto direto, então não há nada para promover a sujeito. Esta oração negativa não tem forma passiva.
В «The weather being terrible, have we stayed home all day?» (Perfect в Present) глагол stay (оставаться) непереходный — прямого дополнения нет, значит, повышать в подлежащее нечего. У этого вопросительного предложения пассивной формы не существует.«The weather being terrible, have we stayed home all day?» (Perfect Present'da) stay (qolmoq) o'timsiz fe'l — to'g'ri to'ldiruvchi yo'q, shuning uchun egaga ko'chiradigan narsa yo'q. Bu so'roq gapning passiv shakli mavjud emas.In "The weather being terrible, have we stayed home all day?" (Perfect Present), the verb stay is intransitive — there is no direct object, so there is nothing to promote to subject. This interrogative sentence has no passive form.En «The weather being terrible, have we stayed home all day?» (Perfect Present), el verbo stay (quedarse) es intransitivo — no hay complemento directo, así que no hay nada que elevar a sujeto. Esta oración interrogativa no tiene forma pasiva.在“The weather being terrible, have we stayed home all day?”(Perfect Present)中,动词 stay(留下) 是不及物动词——没有直接宾语,因此没有可以提升为主语的成分。这个疑问句没有被动语态形式。"The weather being terrible, have we stayed home all day?" (Perfect Present) में क्रिया stay (रुकना) अकर्मक है — कोई प्रत्यक्ष कर्म (direct object) नहीं है, इसलिए कर्ता (subject) बनाने के लिए कुछ नहीं है। इस प्रश्नवाचक वाक्य का कोई कर्मवाच्य (passive) रूप नहीं है।Em «The weather being terrible, have we stayed home all day?» (Perfect Present), o verbo stay (ficar) é intransitivo — não há objeto direto, então não há nada para promover a sujeito. Esta oração interrogativa não tem forma passiva.
В «The weather being terrible, we stayed home all day.» (Simple в Past) глагол stay (оставаться) непереходный — прямого дополнения нет, значит, повышать в подлежащее нечего. У этого утвердительного предложения пассивной формы не существует.«The weather being terrible, we stayed home all day.» (Simple Past'da) stay (qolmoq) o'timsiz fe'l — to'g'ri to'ldiruvchi yo'q, shuning uchun egaga ko'chiradigan narsa yo'q. Bu darak gapning passiv shakli mavjud emas.In "The weather being terrible, we stayed home all day." (Simple Past), the verb stay is intransitive — there is no direct object, so there is nothing to promote to subject. This affirmative sentence has no passive form.En «The weather being terrible, we stayed home all day.» (Simple Past), el verbo stay (quedarse) es intransitivo — no hay complemento directo, así que no hay nada que elevar a sujeto. Esta oración afirmativa no tiene forma pasiva.在“The weather being terrible, we stayed home all day.”(Simple Past)中,动词 stay(留下) 是不及物动词——没有直接宾语,因此没有可以提升为主语的成分。这个陈述句没有被动语态形式。"The weather being terrible, we stayed home all day." (Simple Past) में क्रिया stay (रुकना) अकर्मक है — कोई प्रत्यक्ष कर्म (direct object) नहीं है, इसलिए कर्ता (subject) बनाने के लिए कुछ नहीं है। इस सकारात्मक वाक्य का कोई कर्मवाच्य (passive) रूप नहीं है।Em «The weather being terrible, we stayed home all day.» (Simple Past), o verbo stay (ficar) é intransitivo — não há objeto direto, então não há nada para promover a sujeito. Esta oração afirmativa não tem forma passiva.
В «The weather being terrible, we did not stay home all day.» (Simple в Past) глагол stay (оставаться) непереходный — прямого дополнения нет, значит, повышать в подлежащее нечего. У этого отрицательного предложения пассивной формы не существует.«The weather being terrible, we did not stay home all day.» (Simple Past'da) stay (qolmoq) o'timsiz fe'l — to'g'ri to'ldiruvchi yo'q, shuning uchun egaga ko'chiradigan narsa yo'q. Bu inkor gapning passiv shakli mavjud emas.In "The weather being terrible, we did not stay home all day." (Simple Past), the verb stay is intransitive — there is no direct object, so there is nothing to promote to subject. This negative sentence has no passive form.En «The weather being terrible, we did not stay home all day.» (Simple Past), el verbo stay (quedarse) es intransitivo — no hay complemento directo, así que no hay nada que elevar a sujeto. Esta oración negativa no tiene forma pasiva.在“The weather being terrible, we did not stay home all day.”(Simple Past)中,动词 stay(留下) 是不及物动词——没有直接宾语,因此没有可以提升为主语的成分。这个否定句没有被动语态形式。"The weather being terrible, we did not stay home all day." (Simple Past) में क्रिया stay (रुकना) अकर्मक है — कोई प्रत्यक्ष कर्म (direct object) नहीं है, इसलिए कर्ता (subject) बनाने के लिए कुछ नहीं है। इस नकारात्मक वाक्य का कोई कर्मवाच्य (passive) रूप नहीं है।Em «The weather being terrible, we did not stay home all day.» (Simple Past), o verbo stay (ficar) é intransitivo — não há objeto direto, então não há nada para promover a sujeito. Esta oração negativa não tem forma passiva.
В «The weather being terrible, did we stay home all day?» (Simple в Past) глагол stay (оставаться) непереходный — прямого дополнения нет, значит, повышать в подлежащее нечего. У этого вопросительного предложения пассивной формы не существует.«The weather being terrible, did we stay home all day?» (Simple Past'da) stay (qolmoq) o'timsiz fe'l — to'g'ri to'ldiruvchi yo'q, shuning uchun egaga ko'chiradigan narsa yo'q. Bu so'roq gapning passiv shakli mavjud emas.In "The weather being terrible, did we stay home all day?" (Simple Past), the verb stay is intransitive — there is no direct object, so there is nothing to promote to subject. This interrogative sentence has no passive form.En «The weather being terrible, did we stay home all day?» (Simple Past), el verbo stay (quedarse) es intransitivo — no hay complemento directo, así que no hay nada que elevar a sujeto. Esta oración interrogativa no tiene forma pasiva.在“The weather being terrible, did we stay home all day?”(Simple Past)中,动词 stay(留下) 是不及物动词——没有直接宾语,因此没有可以提升为主语的成分。这个疑问句没有被动语态形式。"The weather being terrible, did we stay home all day?" (Simple Past) में क्रिया stay (रुकना) अकर्मक है — कोई प्रत्यक्ष कर्म (direct object) नहीं है, इसलिए कर्ता (subject) बनाने के लिए कुछ नहीं है। इस प्रश्नवाचक वाक्य का कोई कर्मवाच्य (passive) रूप नहीं है।Em «The weather being terrible, did we stay home all day?» (Simple Past), o verbo stay (ficar) é intransitivo — não há objeto direto, então não há nada para promover a sujeito. Esta oração interrogativa não tem forma passiva.
В «The weather being terrible, we were staying home all day.» (Continuous в Past) глагол stay (оставаться) непереходный — прямого дополнения нет, значит, повышать в подлежащее нечего. У этого утвердительного предложения пассивной формы не существует.«The weather being terrible, we were staying home all day.» (Continuous Past'da) stay (qolmoq) o'timsiz fe'l — to'g'ri to'ldiruvchi yo'q, shuning uchun egaga ko'chiradigan narsa yo'q. Bu darak gapning passiv shakli mavjud emas.In "The weather being terrible, we were staying home all day." (Continuous Past), the verb stay is intransitive — there is no direct object, so there is nothing to promote to subject. This affirmative sentence has no passive form.En «The weather being terrible, we were staying home all day.» (Continuous Past), el verbo stay (quedarse) es intransitivo — no hay complemento directo, así que no hay nada que elevar a sujeto. Esta oración afirmativa no tiene forma pasiva.在“The weather being terrible, we were staying home all day.”(Continuous Past)中,动词 stay(留下) 是不及物动词——没有直接宾语,因此没有可以提升为主语的成分。这个陈述句没有被动语态形式。"The weather being terrible, we were staying home all day." (Continuous Past) में क्रिया stay (रुकना) अकर्मक है — कोई प्रत्यक्ष कर्म (direct object) नहीं है, इसलिए कर्ता (subject) बनाने के लिए कुछ नहीं है। इस सकारात्मक वाक्य का कोई कर्मवाच्य (passive) रूप नहीं है।Em «The weather being terrible, we were staying home all day.» (Continuous Past), o verbo stay (ficar) é intransitivo — não há objeto direto, então não há nada para promover a sujeito. Esta oração afirmativa não tem forma passiva.
В «The weather being terrible, we were not staying home all day.» (Continuous в Past) глагол stay (оставаться) непереходный — прямого дополнения нет, значит, повышать в подлежащее нечего. У этого отрицательного предложения пассивной формы не существует.«The weather being terrible, we were not staying home all day.» (Continuous Past'da) stay (qolmoq) o'timsiz fe'l — to'g'ri to'ldiruvchi yo'q, shuning uchun egaga ko'chiradigan narsa yo'q. Bu inkor gapning passiv shakli mavjud emas.In "The weather being terrible, we were not staying home all day." (Continuous Past), the verb stay is intransitive — there is no direct object, so there is nothing to promote to subject. This negative sentence has no passive form.En «The weather being terrible, we were not staying home all day.» (Continuous Past), el verbo stay (quedarse) es intransitivo — no hay complemento directo, así que no hay nada que elevar a sujeto. Esta oración negativa no tiene forma pasiva.在“The weather being terrible, we were not staying home all day.”(Continuous Past)中,动词 stay(留下) 是不及物动词——没有直接宾语,因此没有可以提升为主语的成分。这个否定句没有被动语态形式。"The weather being terrible, we were not staying home all day." (Continuous Past) में क्रिया stay (रुकना) अकर्मक है — कोई प्रत्यक्ष कर्म (direct object) नहीं है, इसलिए कर्ता (subject) बनाने के लिए कुछ नहीं है। इस नकारात्मक वाक्य का कोई कर्मवाच्य (passive) रूप नहीं है।Em «The weather being terrible, we were not staying home all day.» (Continuous Past), o verbo stay (ficar) é intransitivo — não há objeto direto, então não há nada para promover a sujeito. Esta oração negativa não tem forma passiva.
В «The weather being terrible, were we staying home all day?» (Continuous в Past) глагол stay (оставаться) непереходный — прямого дополнения нет, значит, повышать в подлежащее нечего. У этого вопросительного предложения пассивной формы не существует.«The weather being terrible, were we staying home all day?» (Continuous Past'da) stay (qolmoq) o'timsiz fe'l — to'g'ri to'ldiruvchi yo'q, shuning uchun egaga ko'chiradigan narsa yo'q. Bu so'roq gapning passiv shakli mavjud emas.In "The weather being terrible, were we staying home all day?" (Continuous Past), the verb stay is intransitive — there is no direct object, so there is nothing to promote to subject. This interrogative sentence has no passive form.En «The weather being terrible, were we staying home all day?» (Continuous Past), el verbo stay (quedarse) es intransitivo — no hay complemento directo, así que no hay nada que elevar a sujeto. Esta oración interrogativa no tiene forma pasiva.在“The weather being terrible, were we staying home all day?”(Continuous Past)中,动词 stay(留下) 是不及物动词——没有直接宾语,因此没有可以提升为主语的成分。这个疑问句没有被动语态形式。"The weather being terrible, were we staying home all day?" (Continuous Past) में क्रिया stay (रुकना) अकर्मक है — कोई प्रत्यक्ष कर्म (direct object) नहीं है, इसलिए कर्ता (subject) बनाने के लिए कुछ नहीं है। इस प्रश्नवाचक वाक्य का कोई कर्मवाच्य (passive) रूप नहीं है।Em «The weather being terrible, were we staying home all day?» (Continuous Past), o verbo stay (ficar) é intransitivo — não há objeto direto, então não há nada para promover a sujeito. Esta oração interrogativa não tem forma passiva.
В «The weather being terrible, we had stayed home all day.» (Perfect в Past) глагол stay (оставаться) непереходный — прямого дополнения нет, значит, повышать в подлежащее нечего. У этого утвердительного предложения пассивной формы не существует.«The weather being terrible, we had stayed home all day.» (Perfect Past'da) stay (qolmoq) o'timsiz fe'l — to'g'ri to'ldiruvchi yo'q, shuning uchun egaga ko'chiradigan narsa yo'q. Bu darak gapning passiv shakli mavjud emas.In "The weather being terrible, we had stayed home all day." (Perfect Past), the verb stay is intransitive — there is no direct object, so there is nothing to promote to subject. This affirmative sentence has no passive form.En «The weather being terrible, we had stayed home all day.» (Perfect Past), el verbo stay (quedarse) es intransitivo — no hay complemento directo, así que no hay nada que elevar a sujeto. Esta oración afirmativa no tiene forma pasiva.在“The weather being terrible, we had stayed home all day.”(Perfect Past)中,动词 stay(留下) 是不及物动词——没有直接宾语,因此没有可以提升为主语的成分。这个陈述句没有被动语态形式。"The weather being terrible, we had stayed home all day." (Perfect Past) में क्रिया stay (रुकना) अकर्मक है — कोई प्रत्यक्ष कर्म (direct object) नहीं है, इसलिए कर्ता (subject) बनाने के लिए कुछ नहीं है। इस सकारात्मक वाक्य का कोई कर्मवाच्य (passive) रूप नहीं है।Em «The weather being terrible, we had stayed home all day.» (Perfect Past), o verbo stay (ficar) é intransitivo — não há objeto direto, então não há nada para promover a sujeito. Esta oração afirmativa não tem forma passiva.
В «The weather being terrible, we had not stayed home all day.» (Perfect в Past) глагол stay (оставаться) непереходный — прямого дополнения нет, значит, повышать в подлежащее нечего. У этого отрицательного предложения пассивной формы не существует.«The weather being terrible, we had not stayed home all day.» (Perfect Past'da) stay (qolmoq) o'timsiz fe'l — to'g'ri to'ldiruvchi yo'q, shuning uchun egaga ko'chiradigan narsa yo'q. Bu inkor gapning passiv shakli mavjud emas.In "The weather being terrible, we had not stayed home all day." (Perfect Past), the verb stay is intransitive — there is no direct object, so there is nothing to promote to subject. This negative sentence has no passive form.En «The weather being terrible, we had not stayed home all day.» (Perfect Past), el verbo stay (quedarse) es intransitivo — no hay complemento directo, así que no hay nada que elevar a sujeto. Esta oración negativa no tiene forma pasiva.在“The weather being terrible, we had not stayed home all day.”(Perfect Past)中,动词 stay(留下) 是不及物动词——没有直接宾语,因此没有可以提升为主语的成分。这个否定句没有被动语态形式。"The weather being terrible, we had not stayed home all day." (Perfect Past) में क्रिया stay (रुकना) अकर्मक है — कोई प्रत्यक्ष कर्म (direct object) नहीं है, इसलिए कर्ता (subject) बनाने के लिए कुछ नहीं है। इस नकारात्मक वाक्य का कोई कर्मवाच्य (passive) रूप नहीं है।Em «The weather being terrible, we had not stayed home all day.» (Perfect Past), o verbo stay (ficar) é intransitivo — não há objeto direto, então não há nada para promover a sujeito. Esta oração negativa não tem forma passiva.
В «The weather being terrible, had we stayed home all day?» (Perfect в Past) глагол stay (оставаться) непереходный — прямого дополнения нет, значит, повышать в подлежащее нечего. У этого вопросительного предложения пассивной формы не существует.«The weather being terrible, had we stayed home all day?» (Perfect Past'da) stay (qolmoq) o'timsiz fe'l — to'g'ri to'ldiruvchi yo'q, shuning uchun egaga ko'chiradigan narsa yo'q. Bu so'roq gapning passiv shakli mavjud emas.In "The weather being terrible, had we stayed home all day?" (Perfect Past), the verb stay is intransitive — there is no direct object, so there is nothing to promote to subject. This interrogative sentence has no passive form.En «The weather being terrible, had we stayed home all day?» (Perfect Past), el verbo stay (quedarse) es intransitivo — no hay complemento directo, así que no hay nada que elevar a sujeto. Esta oración interrogativa no tiene forma pasiva.在“The weather being terrible, had we stayed home all day?”(Perfect Past)中,动词 stay(留下) 是不及物动词——没有直接宾语,因此没有可以提升为主语的成分。这个疑问句没有被动语态形式。"The weather being terrible, had we stayed home all day?" (Perfect Past) में क्रिया stay (रुकना) अकर्मक है — कोई प्रत्यक्ष कर्म (direct object) नहीं है, इसलिए कर्ता (subject) बनाने के लिए कुछ नहीं है। इस प्रश्नवाचक वाक्य का कोई कर्मवाच्य (passive) रूप नहीं है।Em «The weather being terrible, had we stayed home all day?» (Perfect Past), o verbo stay (ficar) é intransitivo — não há objeto direto, então não há nada para promover a sujeito. Esta oração interrogativa não tem forma passiva.
В «The weather being terrible, we will stay home all day.» (Simple в Future) глагол stay (оставаться) непереходный — прямого дополнения нет, значит, повышать в подлежащее нечего. У этого утвердительного предложения пассивной формы не существует.«The weather being terrible, we will stay home all day.» (Simple Future'da) stay (qolmoq) o'timsiz fe'l — to'g'ri to'ldiruvchi yo'q, shuning uchun egaga ko'chiradigan narsa yo'q. Bu darak gapning passiv shakli mavjud emas.In "The weather being terrible, we will stay home all day." (Simple Future), the verb stay is intransitive — there is no direct object, so there is nothing to raise into the subject. This affirmative sentence has no passive form.En «The weather being terrible, we will stay home all day.» (Simple Future), el verbo stay (quedarse) es intransitivo — no hay complemento directo, así que no hay nada que elevar a sujeto. Esta oración afirmativa no tiene forma pasiva.在「The weather being terrible, we will stay home all day.」(一般将来时)中,动词 stay(待着)是不及物动词——没有直接宾语,因此没有可提升为主语的成分。这个陈述句没有被动语态形式。«The weather being terrible, we will stay home all day.» (Simple Future) में क्रिया stay (रहना) अकर्मक है — कोई प्रत्यक्ष कर्म नहीं है, इसलिए कर्ता में उन्नत करने के लिए कुछ नहीं है। इस सकारात्मक वाक्य का कोई कर्मवाच्य रूप नहीं है।Em «The weather being terrible, we will stay home all day.» (Simple Future), o verbo stay (ficar) é intransitivo — não há objeto direto, portanto não há nada para elevar a sujeito. Esta oração afirmativa não tem forma passiva.
В «The weather being terrible, we will not stay home all day.» (Simple в Future) глагол stay (оставаться) непереходный — прямого дополнения нет, значит, повышать в подлежащее нечего. У этого отрицательного предложения пассивной формы не существует.«The weather being terrible, we will not stay home all day.» (Simple Future'da) stay (qolmoq) o'timsiz fe'l — to'g'ri to'ldiruvchi yo'q, shuning uchun egaga ko'chiradigan narsa yo'q. Bu inkor gapning passiv shakli mavjud emas.In "The weather being terrible, we will not stay home all day." (Simple Future), the verb stay is intransitive — there is no direct object, so there is nothing to raise into the subject. This negative sentence has no passive form.En «The weather being terrible, we will not stay home all day.» (Simple Future), el verbo stay (quedarse) es intransitivo — no hay complemento directo, así que no hay nada que elevar a sujeto. Esta oración negativa no tiene forma pasiva.在「The weather being terrible, we will not stay home all day.」(一般将来时)中,动词 stay(待着)是不及物动词——没有直接宾语,因此没有可提升为主语的成分。这个否定句没有被动语态形式。«The weather being terrible, we will not stay home all day.» (Simple Future) में क्रिया stay (रहना) अकर्मक है — कोई प्रत्यक्ष कर्म नहीं है, इसलिए कर्ता में उन्नत करने के लिए कुछ नहीं है। इस नकारात्मक वाक्य का कोई कर्मवाच्य रूप नहीं है।Em «The weather being terrible, we will not stay home all day.» (Simple Future), o verbo stay (ficar) é intransitivo — não há objeto direto, portanto não há nada para elevar a sujeito. Esta oração negativa não tem forma passiva.
В «The weather being terrible, will we stay home all day?» (Simple в Future) глагол stay (оставаться) непереходный — прямого дополнения нет, значит, повышать в подлежащее нечего. У этого вопросительного предложения пассивной формы не существует.«The weather being terrible, will we stay home all day?» (Simple Future'da) stay (qolmoq) o'timsiz fe'l — to'g'ri to'ldiruvchi yo'q, shuning uchun egaga ko'chiradigan narsa yo'q. Bu so'roq gapning passiv shakli mavjud emas.In "The weather being terrible, will we stay home all day?" (Simple Future), the verb stay is intransitive — there is no direct object, so there is nothing to raise into the subject. This interrogative sentence has no passive form.En «The weather being terrible, will we stay home all day?» (Simple Future), el verbo stay (quedarse) es intransitivo — no hay complemento directo, así que no hay nada que elevar a sujeto. Esta oración interrogativa no tiene forma pasiva.在「The weather being terrible, will we stay home all day?」(一般将来时)中,动词 stay(待着)是不及物动词——没有直接宾语,因此没有可提升为主语的成分。这个疑问句没有被动语态形式。«The weather being terrible, will we stay home all day?» (Simple Future) में क्रिया stay (रहना) अकर्मक है — कोई प्रत्यक्ष कर्म नहीं है, इसलिए कर्ता में उन्नत करने के लिए कुछ नहीं है। इस प्रश्नवाचक वाक्य का कोई कर्मवाच्य रूप नहीं है।Em «The weather being terrible, will we stay home all day?» (Simple Future), o verbo stay (ficar) é intransitivo — não há objeto direto, portanto não há nada para elevar a sujeito. Esta oração interrogativa não tem forma passiva.
В «The weather being terrible, we will be staying home all day.» (Continuous в Future) глагол stay (оставаться) непереходный — прямого дополнения нет, значит, повышать в подлежащее нечего. У этого утвердительного предложения пассивной формы не существует.«The weather being terrible, we will be staying home all day.» (Continuous Future'da) stay (qolmoq) o'timsiz fe'l — to'g'ri to'ldiruvchi yo'q, shuning uchun egaga ko'chiradigan narsa yo'q. Bu darak gapning passiv shakli mavjud emas.In "The weather being terrible, we will be staying home all day." (Continuous Future), the verb stay is intransitive — there is no direct object, so there is nothing to raise into the subject. This affirmative sentence has no passive form.En «The weather being terrible, we will be staying home all day.» (Continuous Future), el verbo stay (quedarse) es intransitivo — no hay complemento directo, así que no hay nada que elevar a sujeto. Esta oración afirmativa no tiene forma pasiva.在「The weather being terrible, we will be staying home all day.」(将来进行时)中,动词 stay(待着)是不及物动词——没有直接宾语,因此没有可提升为主语的成分。这个陈述句没有被动语态形式。«The weather being terrible, we will be staying home all day.» (Continuous Future) में क्रिया stay (रहना) अकर्मक है — कोई प्रत्यक्ष कर्म नहीं है, इसलिए कर्ता में उन्नत करने के लिए कुछ नहीं है। इस सकारात्मक वाक्य का कोई कर्मवाच्य रूप नहीं है।Em «The weather being terrible, we will be staying home all day.» (Continuous Future), o verbo stay (ficar) é intransitivo — não há objeto direto, portanto não há nada para elevar a sujeito. Esta oração afirmativa não tem forma passiva.
В «The weather being terrible, we will not be staying home all day.» (Continuous в Future) глагол stay (оставаться) непереходный — прямого дополнения нет, значит, повышать в подлежащее нечего. У этого отрицательного предложения пассивной формы не существует.«The weather being terrible, we will not be staying home all day.» (Continuous Future'da) stay (qolmoq) o'timsiz fe'l — to'g'ri to'ldiruvchi yo'q, shuning uchun egaga ko'chiradigan narsa yo'q. Bu inkor gapning passiv shakli mavjud emas.In "The weather being terrible, we will not be staying home all day." (Continuous Future), the verb stay is intransitive — there is no direct object, so there is nothing to raise into the subject. This negative sentence has no passive form.En «The weather being terrible, we will not be staying home all day.» (Continuous Future), el verbo stay (quedarse) es intransitivo — no hay complemento directo, así que no hay nada que elevar a sujeto. Esta oración negativa no tiene forma pasiva.在「The weather being terrible, we will not be staying home all day.」(将来进行时)中,动词 stay(待着)是不及物动词——没有直接宾语,因此没有可提升为主语的成分。这个否定句没有被动语态形式。«The weather being terrible, we will not be staying home all day.» (Continuous Future) में क्रिया stay (रहना) अकर्मक है — कोई प्रत्यक्ष कर्म नहीं है, इसलिए कर्ता में उन्नत करने के लिए कुछ नहीं है। इस नकारात्मक वाक्य का कोई कर्मवाच्य रूप नहीं है।Em «The weather being terrible, we will not be staying home all day.» (Continuous Future), o verbo stay (ficar) é intransitivo — não há objeto direto, portanto não há nada para elevar a sujeito. Esta oração negativa não tem forma passiva.
В «The weather being terrible, will we be staying home all day?» (Continuous в Future) глагол stay (оставаться) непереходный — прямого дополнения нет, значит, повышать в подлежащее нечего. У этого вопросительного предложения пассивной формы не существует.«The weather being terrible, will we be staying home all day?» (Continuous Future'da) stay (qolmoq) o'timsiz fe'l — to'g'ri to'ldiruvchi yo'q, shuning uchun egaga ko'chiradigan narsa yo'q. Bu so'roq gapning passiv shakli mavjud emas.In "The weather being terrible, will we be staying home all day?" (Continuous Future), the verb stay is intransitive — there is no direct object, so there is nothing to raise into the subject. This interrogative sentence has no passive form.En «The weather being terrible, will we be staying home all day?» (Continuous Future), el verbo stay (quedarse) es intransitivo — no hay complemento directo, así que no hay nada que elevar a sujeto. Esta oración interrogativa no tiene forma pasiva.在「The weather being terrible, will we be staying home all day?」(将来进行时)中,动词 stay(待着)是不及物动词——没有直接宾语,因此没有可提升为主语的成分。这个疑问句没有被动语态形式。«The weather being terrible, will we be staying home all day?» (Continuous Future) में क्रिया stay (रहना) अकर्मक है — कोई प्रत्यक्ष कर्म नहीं है, इसलिए कर्ता में उन्नत करने के लिए कुछ नहीं है। इस प्रश्नवाचक वाक्य का कोई कर्मवाच्य रूप नहीं है।Em «The weather being terrible, will we be staying home all day?» (Continuous Future), o verbo stay (ficar) é intransitivo — não há objeto direto, portanto não há nada para elevar a sujeito. Esta oração interrogativa não tem forma passiva.
В «The weather being terrible, we will have stayed home all day.» (Perfect в Future) глагол stay (оставаться) непереходный — прямого дополнения нет, значит, повышать в подлежащее нечего. У этого утвердительного предложения пассивной формы не существует.«The weather being terrible, we will have stayed home all day.» (Perfect Future'da) stay (qolmoq) o'timsiz fe'l — to'g'ri to'ldiruvchi yo'q, shuning uchun egaga ko'chiradigan narsa yo'q. Bu darak gapning passiv shakli mavjud emas.In "The weather being terrible, we will have stayed home all day." (Perfect Future), the verb stay is intransitive — there is no direct object, so there is nothing to raise into the subject. This affirmative sentence has no passive form.En «The weather being terrible, we will have stayed home all day.» (Perfect Future), el verbo stay (quedarse) es intransitivo — no hay complemento directo, así que no hay nada que elevar a sujeto. Esta oración afirmativa no tiene forma pasiva.在「The weather being terrible, we will have stayed home all day.」(将来完成时)中,动词 stay(待着)是不及物动词——没有直接宾语,因此没有可提升为主语的成分。这个陈述句没有被动语态形式。«The weather being terrible, we will have stayed home all day.» (Perfect Future) में क्रिया stay (रहना) अकर्मक है — कोई प्रत्यक्ष कर्म नहीं है, इसलिए कर्ता में उन्नत करने के लिए कुछ नहीं है। इस सकारात्मक वाक्य का कोई कर्मवाच्य रूप नहीं है।Em «The weather being terrible, we will have stayed home all day.» (Perfect Future), o verbo stay (ficar) é intransitivo — não há objeto direto, portanto não há nada para elevar a sujeito. Esta oração afirmativa não tem forma passiva.
В «The weather being terrible, we will not have stayed home all day.» (Perfect в Future) глагол stay (оставаться) непереходный — прямого дополнения нет, значит, повышать в подлежащее нечего. У этого отрицательного предложения пассивной формы не существует.«The weather being terrible, we will not have stayed home all day.» (Perfect Future'da) stay (qolmoq) o'timsiz fe'l — to'g'ri to'ldiruvchi yo'q, shuning uchun egaga ko'chiradigan narsa yo'q. Bu inkor gapning passiv shakli mavjud emas.In "The weather being terrible, we will not have stayed home all day." (Perfect Future), the verb stay is intransitive — there is no direct object, so there is nothing to raise into the subject. This negative sentence has no passive form.En «The weather being terrible, we will not have stayed home all day.» (Perfect Future), el verbo stay (quedarse) es intransitivo — no hay complemento directo, así que no hay nada que elevar a sujeto. Esta oración negativa no tiene forma pasiva.在「The weather being terrible, we will not have stayed home all day.」(将来完成时)中,动词 stay(待着)是不及物动词——没有直接宾语,因此没有可提升为主语的成分。这个否定句没有被动语态形式。«The weather being terrible, we will not have stayed home all day.» (Perfect Future) में क्रिया stay (रहना) अकर्मक है — कोई प्रत्यक्ष कर्म नहीं है, इसलिए कर्ता में उन्नत करने के लिए कुछ नहीं है। इस नकारात्मक वाक्य का कोई कर्मवाच्य रूप नहीं है।Em «The weather being terrible, we will not have stayed home all day.» (Perfect Future), o verbo stay (ficar) é intransitivo — não há objeto direto, portanto não há nada para elevar a sujeito. Esta oração negativa não tem forma passiva.
В «The weather being terrible, will we have stayed home all day?» (Perfect в Future) глагол stay (оставаться) непереходный — прямого дополнения нет, значит, повышать в подлежащее нечего. У этого вопросительного предложения пассивной формы не существует.«The weather being terrible, will we have stayed home all day?» (Perfect Future'da) stay (qolmoq) o'timsiz fe'l — to'g'ri to'ldiruvchi yo'q, shuning uchun egaga ko'chiradigan narsa yo'q. Bu so'roq gapning passiv shakli mavjud emas.In "The weather being terrible, will we have stayed home all day?" (Perfect Future), the verb stay is intransitive — there is no direct object, so there is nothing to raise into the subject. This interrogative sentence has no passive form.En «The weather being terrible, will we have stayed home all day?» (Perfect Future), el verbo stay (quedarse) es intransitivo — no hay complemento directo, así que no hay nada que elevar a sujeto. Esta oración interrogativa no tiene forma pasiva.在「The weather being terrible, will we have stayed home all day?」(将来完成时)中,动词 stay(待着)是不及物动词——没有直接宾语,因此没有可提升为主语的成分。这个疑问句没有被动语态形式。«The weather being terrible, will we have stayed home all day?» (Perfect Future) में क्रिया stay (रहना) अकर्मक है — कोई प्रत्यक्ष कर्म नहीं है, इसलिए कर्ता में उन्नत करने के लिए कुछ नहीं है। इस प्रश्नवाचक वाक्य का कोई कर्मवाच्य रूप नहीं है।Em «The weather being terrible, will we have stayed home all day?» (Perfect Future), o verbo stay (ficar) é intransitivo — não há objeto direto, portanto não há nada para elevar a sujeito. Esta oração interrogativa não tem forma passiva.
Indep (Absolute) + S + V + Adv(Place) + Adv(Time)
Indep (Absolute) + S + V + NOT + Adv(Place) + Adv(Time)
Indep (Absolute) + V(aux) + S + V + Adv(Place) + Adv(Time)
—
Absolute Construction имеет своё «подлежащее» (the weather), не совпадающее с S всего предложения (we).Absolute Construction o'z «egasi»ga ega (the weather), gapning S'i (we) bilan mos kelmaydi.The Absolute Construction has its own "subject" (the weather), which does not coincide with the S of the whole sentence (we).La Absolute Construction tiene su propio «sujeto» (the weather), que no coincide con el S de toda la oración (we).Absolute Construction(独立结构)有自己的“主语”(the weather),与整个句子的 S(we)不一致。Absolute Construction का अपना "कर्ता" (the weather) होता है, जो पूरे वाक्य के S (we) से मेल नहीं खाता।A Absolute Construction tem seu próprio "sujeito" (the weather), que não coincide com o S de toda a oração (we).
Absolute Construction не меняется вообще — отрицание касается только главного предложения.Absolute Construction umuman o'zgarmaydi — inkor faqat bosh gapga tegishli.The Absolute Construction does not change at all — the negation applies only to the main clause.La Absolute Construction no cambia en absoluto — la negación afecta solo a la oración principal.Absolute Construction 完全不变——否定只涉及主句。Absolute Construction बिल्कुल नहीं बदलता — निषेध केवल मुख्य वाक्य से संबंधित है।A Absolute Construction não muda em nada — a negação diz respeito apenas à oração principal.
Тот же принцип: Independent Element «наблюдает со стороны» и не участвует в инверсии.Xuddi shu tamoyil: Independent Element «chetdan kuzatadi» va inversiyada qatnashmaydi.Same principle: the Independent Element "watches from the sidelines" and does not participate in inversion.Mismo principio: el Independent Element «observa desde fuera» y no participa en la inversión.同样的原则:Independent Element“在一旁观望”,不参与倒装。वही सिद्धांत: Independent Element "बाहर से देखता है" और इनवर्जन (inversion) में भाग नहीं लेता।Mesmo princípio: o Independent Element "observa de fora" e não participa da inversão.
В «The weather being terrible, we stay home all day.» (Simple в Present) глагол stay (оставаться) непереходный — прямого дополнения нет, значит, повышать в подлежащее нечего. У этого утвердительного предложения пассивной формы не существует.«The weather being terrible, we stay home all day.» (Simple Present'da) stay (qolmoq) o'timsiz fe'l — to'g'ri to'ldiruvchi yo'q, shuning uchun egaga ko'chiradigan narsa yo'q. Bu darak gapning passiv shakli mavjud emas.In "The weather being terrible, we stay home all day." (Simple Present), the verb stay is intransitive — there is no direct object, so there is nothing to promote to subject. This affirmative sentence has no passive form.En «The weather being terrible, we stay home all day.» (Simple Present), el verbo stay (quedarse) es intransitivo — no hay complemento directo, así que no hay nada que elevar a sujeto. Esta oración afirmativa no tiene forma pasiva.在“The weather being terrible, we stay home all day.”(Simple Present)中,动词 stay(留下) 是不及物动词——没有直接宾语,因此没有可以提升为主语的成分。这个陈述句没有被动语态形式。"The weather being terrible, we stay home all day." (Simple Present) में क्रिया stay (रुकना) अकर्मक है — कोई प्रत्यक्ष कर्म (direct object) नहीं है, इसलिए कर्ता (subject) बनाने के लिए कुछ नहीं है। इस सकारात्मक वाक्य का कोई कर्मवाच्य (passive) रूप नहीं है।Em «The weather being terrible, we stay home all day.» (Simple Present), o verbo stay (ficar) é intransitivo — não há objeto direto, então não há nada para promover a sujeito. Esta oração afirmativa não tem forma passiva.
10
You can give her the report this morning.
You cannot give her the report this morning.
Can you give her the report this morning?
You can be giving her the report this morning.
You cannot be giving her the report this morning.
Can you be giving her the report this morning?
You can have given her the report this morning.
You cannot have given her the report this morning.
Can you have given her the report this morning?
You could give her the report yesterday morning.
You could not give her the report yesterday morning.
Could you give her the report yesterday morning?
You could be giving her the report yesterday morning.
You could not be giving her the report yesterday morning.
Could you be giving her the report yesterday morning?
You could have given her the report yesterday morning.
You could not have given her the report yesterday morning.
Could you have given her the report yesterday morning?
You will be able to give her the report tomorrow morning.
You will not be able to give her the report tomorrow morning.
Will you be able to give her the report tomorrow morning?
You will be giving her the report tomorrow morning.
You will not be giving her the report tomorrow morning.
Will you be giving her the report tomorrow morning?
You will have given her the report tomorrow morning.
You will not have given her the report tomorrow morning.
Will you have given her the report tomorrow morning?
She can be given the report by you this morning.
She cannot be given the report by you this morning.
Can she be given the report by you this morning?
She can be being given the report by you this morning.
She cannot be being given the report by you this morning.
Can she be being given the report by you this morning?
She can have been given the report by you this morning.
She cannot have been given the report by you this morning.
Can she have been given the report by you this morning?
She could be given the report by you yesterday morning.
She could not be given the report by you yesterday morning.
Could she be given the report by you yesterday morning?
She could be being given the report by you yesterday morning.
She could not be being given the report by you yesterday morning.
Could she be being given the report by you yesterday morning?
She could have been given the report by you yesterday morning.
She could not have been given the report by you yesterday morning.
Could she have been given the report by you yesterday morning?
She will be able to be given the report by you tomorrow morning.
She will not be able to be given the report by you tomorrow morning.
Will she be able to be given the report by you tomorrow morning?
She will be being given the report by you tomorrow morning.
She will not be being given the report by you tomorrow morning.
Will she be being given the report by you tomorrow morning?
She will have been given the report by you tomorrow morning.
She will not have been given the report by you tomorrow morning.
Will she have been given the report by you tomorrow morning?
S + V(modal) + V + I.O. + (Attr) + D.O. + Adv(Time)
S + V(modal) + NOT + V + I.O. + (Attr) + D.O. + Adv(Time)
V(modal) + S + V + I.O. + (Attr) + D.O. + Adv(Time)
I.O.→S + V(modal) + be + V3 + (Attr) + D.O.(retained) + Adv(Agent) + Adv(Time)
I.O.→S + V(modal) + NOT + be + V3 + (Attr) + D.O.(retained) + Adv(Agent) + Adv(Time)
V(modal) + I.O.→S + be + V3 + (Attr) + D.O.(retained) + Adv(Agent) + Adv(Time)
Модальный (can/could/will) и смысловой give — часть одного вагона Predicate (Compound Verbal Modal). В Continuous/Perfect добавляется be/have: can be giving, could have given.Modal (can/could/will) va mustaqil give — bitta Predicate vagonining qismi. Continuous/Perfect'da be/have qo'shiladi.The modal (can/could/will) and the notional give are part of a single Predicate wagon (Compound Verbal Modal). In Continuous/Perfect, be/have is added: can be giving, could have given.El modal (can/could/will) y el verbo nocional give forman parte de un mismo vagón de Predicate (Compound Verbal Modal). En Continuous/Perfect se añade be/have: can be giving, could have given.情态动词(can/could/will)和实义动词 give 属于同一个 Predicate 车厢(Compound Verbal Modal)。在 Continuous/Perfect 中要加上 be/have:can be giving,could have given。मोडल (can/could/will) और मुख्य क्रिया give एक ही Predicate डिब्बे (Compound Verbal Modal) का हिस्सा हैं। Continuous/Perfect में be/have जोड़ा जाता है: can be giving, could have given।O modal (can/could/will) e o verbo nocional give fazem parte do mesmo vagão de Predicate (Compound Verbal Modal). Em Continuous/Perfect, adiciona-se be/have: can be giving, could have given.
С модальным глаголом not встаёт сразу после него.Modal fe'l bilan not undan darhol keyin turadi.With a modal verb, not comes right after it.Con un verbo modal, not se coloca justo después de él.有情态动词时,not 紧跟在它后面。मोडल क्रिया के साथ, not उसके ठीक बाद आता है।Com um verbo modal, not vem logo depois dele.
Модальный глагол выходит вперёд подлежащего — та же инверсия.Modal fe'l egadan oldinga chiqadi — xuddi shu inversiya.The modal verb moves ahead of the subject — the same inversion.El verbo modal se adelanta al sujeto — la misma inversión.情态动词提到主语前面——同样的倒装。मोडल क्रिया कर्ता से आगे आती है — वही इनवर्जन।O verbo modal vai para antes do sujeito — a mesma inversão.
Модальный пассив = modal + be(+being) + V3 или modal + have + been + V3 в Perfect.Modal passiv = modal + be(+being) + V3 yoki Perfect'da modal + have + been + V3.Modal passive = modal + be(+being) + V3 or modal + have + been + V3 in Perfect.Pasiva modal = modal + be(+being) + V3 o modal + have + been + V3 en Perfect.情态被动式 = modal + be(+being) + V3,或在 Perfect 中为 modal + have + been + V3。मोडल कर्मवाच्य = modal + be(+being) + V3 या Perfect में modal + have + been + V3।Passiva modal = modal + be(+being) + V3 ou modal + have + been + V3 no Perfect.
not встаёт сразу после модального глагола, как и в активном залоге.not faol nisbatdagidek modal fe'ldan keyin darhol turadi.not comes right after the modal verb, just as in the active voice.not se coloca justo después del verbo modal, igual que en la voz activa.not 紧跟在情态动词后面,和主动语态一样。not मोडल क्रिया के ठीक बाद आता है, जैसा कि कर्तृवाच्य (active voice) में होता है।not vem logo depois do verbo modal, assim como na voz ativa.
Модальный глагол выходит вперёд — та же логика, что в активном залоге.Modal fe'l oldinga chiqadi — faol nisbatdagi kabi mantiq.The modal verb moves to the front — the same logic as in the active voice.El verbo modal se adelanta — la misma lógica que en la voz activa.情态动词提前——和主动语态的逻辑相同。मोडल क्रिया आगे आती है — वही तर्क जो कर्तृवाच्य (active voice) में है।O verbo modal vai para a frente — a mesma lógica da voz ativa.
11
Mr. Smith, our new teacher, patiently explains the difficult lesson to the students every morning.
Mr. Smith, our new teacher, does not patiently explain the difficult lesson to the students every morning.
Does Mr. Smith, our new teacher, patiently explain the difficult lesson to the students every morning?
Mr. Smith, our new teacher, is patiently explaining the difficult lesson to the students right now.
Mr. Smith, our new teacher, is not patiently explaining the difficult lesson to the students right now.
Is Mr. Smith, our new teacher, patiently explaining the difficult lesson to the students right now?
Mr. Smith, our new teacher, has patiently explained the difficult lesson to the students already.
Mr. Smith, our new teacher, has not patiently explained the difficult lesson to the students yet.
Has Mr. Smith, our new teacher, patiently explained the difficult lesson to the students yet?
Mr. Smith, our new teacher, patiently explained the difficult lesson to the students this morning.
Mr. Smith, our new teacher, did not patiently explain the difficult lesson to the students this morning.
Did Mr. Smith, our new teacher, patiently explain the difficult lesson to the students this morning?
Mr. Smith, our new teacher, was patiently explaining the difficult lesson to the students at that moment.
Mr. Smith, our new teacher, was not patiently explaining the difficult lesson to the students at that moment.
Was Mr. Smith, our new teacher, patiently explaining the difficult lesson to the students at that moment?
Mr. Smith, our new teacher, had patiently explained the difficult lesson to the students this morning.
Mr. Smith, our new teacher, had not patiently explained the difficult lesson to the students this morning.
Had Mr. Smith, our new teacher, patiently explained the difficult lesson to the students this morning?
Mr. Smith, our new teacher, will patiently explain the difficult lesson to the students tomorrow morning.
Mr. Smith, our new teacher, will not patiently explain the difficult lesson to the students tomorrow morning.
Will Mr. Smith, our new teacher, patiently explain the difficult lesson to the students tomorrow morning?
Mr. Smith, our new teacher, will be patiently explaining the difficult lesson to the students at this time tomorrow.
Mr. Smith, our new teacher, will not be patiently explaining the difficult lesson to the students at this time tomorrow.
Will Mr. Smith, our new teacher, be patiently explaining the difficult lesson to the students at this time tomorrow?
Mr. Smith, our new teacher, will have patiently explained the difficult lesson to the students tomorrow morning.
Mr. Smith, our new teacher, will not have patiently explained the difficult lesson to the students tomorrow morning.
Will Mr. Smith, our new teacher, have patiently explained the difficult lesson to the students tomorrow morning?
The difficult lesson is patiently explained to the students by Mr. Smith, our new teacher, every morning.
The difficult lesson is not patiently explained to the students by Mr. Smith, our new teacher, every morning.
Is the difficult lesson patiently explained to the students by Mr. Smith, our new teacher, every morning?
The difficult lesson is patiently being explained to the students by Mr. Smith, our new teacher, right now.
The difficult lesson is not patiently being explained to the students by Mr. Smith, our new teacher, right now.
Is the difficult lesson patiently being explained to the students by Mr. Smith, our new teacher, right now?
The difficult lesson has patiently been explained to the students by Mr. Smith, our new teacher, already.
The difficult lesson has not patiently been explained to the students by Mr. Smith, our new teacher, yet.
Has the difficult lesson patiently been explained to the students by Mr. Smith, our new teacher, yet?
The difficult lesson was patiently explained to the students by Mr. Smith, our new teacher, this morning.
The difficult lesson was not patiently explained to the students by Mr. Smith, our new teacher, this morning.
Was the difficult lesson patiently explained to the students by Mr. Smith, our new teacher, this morning?
The difficult lesson was patiently being explained to the students by Mr. Smith, our new teacher, at that moment.
The difficult lesson was not patiently being explained to the students by Mr. Smith, our new teacher, at that moment.
Was the difficult lesson patiently being explained to the students by Mr. Smith, our new teacher, at that moment?
The difficult lesson had patiently been explained to the students by Mr. Smith, our new teacher, this morning.
The difficult lesson had not patiently been explained to the students by Mr. Smith, our new teacher, this morning.
Had the difficult lesson patiently been explained to the students by Mr. Smith, our new teacher, this morning?
The difficult lesson will patiently be explained to the students by Mr. Smith, our new teacher, tomorrow morning.
The difficult lesson will not patiently be explained to the students by Mr. Smith, our new teacher, tomorrow morning.
Will the difficult lesson patiently be explained to the students by Mr. Smith, our new teacher, tomorrow morning?
The difficult lesson will patiently be being explained to the students by Mr. Smith, our new teacher, at this time tomorrow.
The difficult lesson will not patiently be being explained to the students by Mr. Smith, our new teacher, at this time tomorrow.
Will the difficult lesson patiently be being explained to the students by Mr. Smith, our new teacher, at this time tomorrow?
The difficult lesson will patiently have been explained to the students by Mr. Smith, our new teacher, tomorrow morning.
The difficult lesson will not patiently have been explained to the students by Mr. Smith, our new teacher, tomorrow morning.
Will the difficult lesson patiently have been explained to the students by Mr. Smith, our new teacher, tomorrow morning?
S + Appos + Adv(Manner) + V + (Attr+Attr) + D.O. + I.O. + Adv(Time)
S + Appos + V + NOT + Adv(Manner) + V + (Attr+Attr) + D.O. + I.O. + Adv(Time)
V(aux) + S + Appos + Adv(Manner) + V + (Attr+Attr) + D.O. + I.O. + Adv(Time)
(Attr+Attr) + D.O.→S + V(be) + Adv(Manner) + V3 + I.O.(retained) + Adv(Agent)+Appos + Adv(Time)
(Attr+Attr) + D.O.→S + V(be) + NOT + Adv(Manner) + V3 + I.O.(retained) + Adv(Agent)+Appos + Adv(Time)
V(be) + (Attr+Attr) + D.O.→S + Adv(Manner) + V3 + I.O.(retained) + Adv(Agent)+Appos + Adv(Time)
Adverbial Manner (patiently) стоит в средней позиции — после первого вспомогательного (или перед смысловым глаголом, если вспомогательного нет).Adverbial Manner (patiently) o'rta pozitsiyada turadi — birinchi yordamchidan keyin (yoki yordamchi bo'lmasa, mustaqil fe'ldan oldin).The Adverbial Manner (patiently) stands in mid position — after the first auxiliary (or before the notional verb if there is no auxiliary).El Adverbial Manner (patiently) se sitúa en posición media — después del primer auxiliar (o antes del verbo nocional si no hay auxiliar).方式状语 Adverbial Manner(patiently)位于中间位置——在第一个助动词之后(若没有助动词,则在实义动词之前)。Adverbial Manner (patiently) मध्य स्थिति में आता है — पहले सहायक क्रिया (auxiliary) के बाद (या यदि कोई सहायक क्रिया न हो तो मुख्य क्रिया से पहले)।O Adverbial Manner (patiently) fica na posição média — depois do primeiro auxiliar (ou antes do verbo nocional, se não houver auxiliar).
not встаёт перед patiently, а не после него.not patientlydan oldin turadi, undan keyin emas.not goes before patiently, not after it.not se coloca antes de patiently, no después.not 放在 patiently 之前,而不是之后。not, patiently से पहले आता है, उसके बाद नहीं।not vem antes de patiently, não depois.
Даже в самом длинном составе инверсия трогает только сам вагон Predicate.Eng uzun sostavda ham inversiya faqat Predicate vagonining o'ziga tegadi.Even in the longest verb chain, inversion touches only the Predicate wagon itself.Incluso en la cadena verbal más larga, la inversión afecta solo al vagón de Predicate en sí.即使在最长的谓语链中,倒装也只影响 Predicate 车厢本身。सबसे लंबी क्रिया-श्रृंखला में भी, इनवर्जन केवल Predicate डिब्बे को ही प्रभावित करता है।Mesmo na cadeia verbal mais longa, a inversão afeta apenas o próprio vagão de Predicate.
У explain нельзя повысить I.O.: в пассиве только D.O. может стать подлежащим, а to the students остаётся предложным I.O.explain fe'lida I.O.ni ko'tarib bo'lmaydi: passivda faqat D.O. egaga aylanishi mumkin.With explain, the I.O. cannot be raised: in the passive, only the D.O. can become the subject, and to the students remains a prepositional I.O.Con explain, no se puede elevar el I.O.: en la pasiva solo el D.O. puede convertirse en sujeto, y to the students permanece como I.O. preposicional.explain 的 I.O. 不能被提升:在被动语态中只有 D.O. 能成为主语,to the students 仍然是介词短语形式的 I.O.。explain में I.O. को उन्नत नहीं किया जा सकता: कर्मवाच्य में केवल D.O. ही कर्ता बन सकता है, और to the students पूर्वसर्गीय (prepositional) I.O. ही बना रहता है।Com explain, o I.O. não pode ser elevado: na passiva, apenas o D.O. pode se tornar sujeito, e to the students permanece como I.O. preposicional.
Adverbial Manner остаётся в средней позиции даже в пассиве.Adverbial Manner passivda ham o'rta pozitsiyada qoladi.The Adverbial Manner stays in mid position even in the passive.El Adverbial Manner permanece en posición media incluso en la pasiva.方式状语在被动语态中依然位于中间位置。Adverbial Manner कर्मवाच्य में भी मध्य स्थिति में रहता है।O Adverbial Manner permanece na posição média mesmo na passiva.
Даже в самом длинном пассивном составе инверсия трогает только be/have.Eng uzun passiv sostavda ham inversiya faqat be/havega tegadi.Even in the longest passive verb chain, inversion touches only be/have.Incluso en la cadena pasiva más larga, la inversión afecta solo a be/have.即使在最长的被动语态动词链中,倒装也只涉及 be/have。सबसे लंबी कर्मवाच्य क्रिया-श्रृंखला में भी, इनवर्जन केवल be/have को प्रभावित करता है।Mesmo na cadeia passiva mais longa, a inversão afeta apenas be/have.
12
Sadly, the coach makes him captain of the team every season.
Sadly, the coach does not make him captain of the team every season.
Sadly, does the coach make him captain of the team every season?
Sadly, the coach is making him captain of the team right now.
Sadly, the coach is not making him captain of the team right now.
Sadly, is the coach making him captain of the team right now?
Sadly, the coach has made him captain of the team already.
Sadly, the coach has not made him captain of the team yet.
Sadly, has the coach made him captain of the team yet?
Sadly, the coach made him captain of the team last season.
Sadly, the coach did not make him captain of the team last season.
Sadly, did the coach make him captain of the team last season?
Sadly, the coach was making him captain of the team at that moment.
Sadly, the coach was not making him captain of the team at that moment.
Sadly, was the coach making him captain of the team at that moment?
Sadly, the coach had made him captain of the team last season.
Sadly, the coach had not made him captain of the team last season.
Sadly, had the coach made him captain of the team last season?
Sadly, the coach will make him captain of the team next season.
Sadly, the coach will not make him captain of the team next season.
Sadly, will the coach make him captain of the team next season?
Sadly, the coach will be making him captain of the team at this time tomorrow.
Sadly, the coach will not be making him captain of the team at this time tomorrow.
Sadly, will the coach be making him captain of the team at this time tomorrow?
Sadly, the coach will have made him captain of the team next season.
Sadly, the coach will not have made him captain of the team next season.
Sadly, will the coach have made him captain of the team next season?
Sadly, he is made captain of the team by the coach every season.
Sadly, he is not made captain of the team by the coach every season.
Sadly, is he made captain of the team by the coach every season?
Sadly, he is being made captain of the team by the coach right now.
Sadly, he is not being made captain of the team by the coach right now.
Sadly, is he being made captain of the team by the coach right now?
Sadly, he has been made captain of the team by the coach already.
Sadly, he has not been made captain of the team by the coach yet.
Sadly, has he been made captain of the team by the coach yet?
Sadly, he was made captain of the team by the coach last season.
Sadly, he was not made captain of the team by the coach last season.
Sadly, was he made captain of the team by the coach last season?
Sadly, he was being made captain of the team by the coach at that moment.
Sadly, he was not being made captain of the team by the coach at that moment.
Sadly, was he being made captain of the team by the coach at that moment?
Sadly, he had been made captain of the team by the coach last season.
Sadly, he had not been made captain of the team by the coach last season.
Sadly, had he been made captain of the team by the coach last season?
Sadly, he will be made captain of the team by the coach next season.
Sadly, he will not be made captain of the team by the coach next season.
Sadly, will he be made captain of the team by the coach next season?
Sadly, he will be being made captain of the team by the coach at this time tomorrow.
Sadly, he will not be being made captain of the team by the coach at this time tomorrow.
Sadly, will he be being made captain of the team by the coach at this time tomorrow?
Sadly, he will have been made captain of the team by the coach next season.
Sadly, he will not have been made captain of the team by the coach next season.
Sadly, will he have been made captain of the team by the coach next season?
Indep + (Attr) + S + V + D.O. + O.C.(+Attr) + Adv(Time)
Indep + (Attr) + S + V + NOT + D.O. + O.C.(+Attr) + Adv(Time)
Indep + V(aux) + (Attr) + S + V + D.O. + O.C.(+Attr) + Adv(Time)
Indep + D.O.→S + V(be) + V3 + O.C.(+Attr) + Adv(Agent) + Adv(Time)
Indep + D.O.→S + V(be) + NOT + V3 + O.C.(+Attr) + Adv(Agent) + Adv(Time)
Indep + V(be) + D.O.→S + V3 + O.C.(+Attr) + Adv(Agent) + Adv(Time)
Attribute (of the team) остаётся приклеенным к O.C. (captain), а не к подлежащему.Attribute (of the team) egaga emas, O.C.ga (captain) yopishgan holda qoladi.The Attribute (of the team) stays glued to the O.C. (captain), not to the subject.El Attribute (of the team) permanece pegado al O.C. (captain), no al sujeto.定语 Attribute(of the team)始终附着在 O.C.(captain)上,而不是主语上。Attribute (of the team) O.C. (captain) से चिपका रहता है, कर्ता से नहीं।O Attribute (of the team) permanece grudado ao O.C. (captain), não ao sujeito.
Independent Element (Sadly) остаётся первым словом в любом времени и виде.Independent Element (Sadly) har qanday zamon va aspektda birinchi so'z bo'lib qoladi.The Independent Element (Sadly) remains the first word regardless of tense and aspect.El Independent Element (Sadly) sigue siendo la primera palabra en cualquier tiempo y aspecto.Independent Element(Sadly)在任何时态和体中都始终是第一个词。Independent Element (Sadly) किसी भी काल और पक्ष (aspect) में पहला शब्द बना रहता है।O Independent Element (Sadly) continua sendo a primeira palavra em qualquer tempo e aspecto.
Даже в вопросе Indep не подчиняется инверсии.Savolda ham Indep inversiyaga bo'ysunmaydi.Even in a question, the Indep does not undergo inversion.Incluso en una pregunta, el Indep no se somete a la inversión.即使在疑问句中,Indep 也不参与倒装。प्रश्न में भी Indep इनवर्जन के अधीन नहीं होता।Mesmo numa pergunta, o Indep não sofre inversão.
Attribute (of the team) остаётся приклеенным к O.C., а не к подлежащему — определение всегда рядом со «своим» словом.Attribute (of the team) egaga emas, O.C.ga yopishgan holda qoladi.The Attribute (of the team) stays glued to the O.C., not to the subject — a modifier always stays next to "its own" word.El Attribute (of the team) permanece pegado al O.C., no al sujeto — un modificador siempre queda junto a «su» palabra.定语 Attribute(of the team)始终附着在 O.C. 上,而不是主语上——修饰语总是紧靠着“自己的”那个词。Attribute (of the team) O.C. से चिपका रहता है, कर्ता से नहीं — विशेषण हमेशा अपने "स्वयं के" शब्द के पास रहता है।O Attribute (of the team) permanece grudado ao O.C., não ao sujeito — um modificador sempre fica junto à "sua" palavra.
Independent Element (Sadly) остаётся первым словом в любом залоге.Independent Element (Sadly) qanday nisbat bo'lishidan qat'i nazar birinchi so'z bo'lib qoladi.The Independent Element (Sadly) remains the first word regardless of voice.El Independent Element (Sadly) sigue siendo la primera palabra en cualquier voz.Independent Element(Sadly)在任何语态下都始终是第一个词。Independent Element (Sadly) किसी भी वाच्य (voice) में पहला शब्द बना रहता है।O Independent Element (Sadly) continua sendo a primeira palavra em qualquer voz.
Даже в пассивном вопросе Indep не подчиняется инверсии.Passiv savolda ham Indep inversiyaga bo'ysunmaydi.Even in a passive question, the Indep does not undergo inversion.Incluso en una pregunta pasiva, el Indep no se somete a la inversión.即使在被动疑问句中,Indep 也不参与倒装。कर्मवाच्य प्रश्न में भी Indep इनवर्जन के अधीन नहीं होता।Mesmo numa pergunta passiva, o Indep não sofre inversão.